Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of customer response models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Segmentation of customers by likelihood of repeating business is a very important tool in marketing management. A number of approaches have been developed to support this activity. This article reviews basic recency, frequency, and monetary (RFM) methods on a set of data involving the sale of beef products. Variants of RFM are demonstrated. Classical data mining techniques of logistic regression, decision trees, and neural networks are also demonstrated. Results indicate a spectrum of tradeoffs. RFM methods are simpler, but less accurate. Considerations of balancing cell sizes as well as compressing data are examined. Both balancing expected cell densities as well as compressing RFM variables into a value function were found to provide more accurate models. Data mining algorithms were all found to provide a noticeable increase in predictive accuracy. Relative tradeoffs among these data mining algorithms in the context of customer segmentation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baesens B, Viaene S, Van den Poel D, Vanthienen J, Dedene G (2002) Bayesian neural network learning for repeat purchase modeling in direct marketing. Eur J Oper Res 138(1):191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bult JR, Wanskeek T (1995) Optimal selection for direct mail. J Market Sci 14(4):378–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crone SF, Lessmann S, Stahlbock R (2006) The impact of preprocessing on data mining: an evaluation of classifier sensitivity in direct marketing. Eur J Oper Res 173(3):781–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui G, Wong ML, Lui H-K (2006) Machine learning for direct marketing response models: Bayesian networks with evolutionary programming. Manag Sci 52(4):597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza R, Krasnodebski M, Abrahams A (2007) Implementation study: using decision tree induction to discover profitable locations to sell pet insurance for a startup company. J Database Market Custom Strategy Manag 14(4):281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner R, Krafft M, Huchzemeier A (2003) Optimizing Rhenania’s mail-order business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM). Interfaces 33(1):50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick M (2001) Statistical analysis for direct marketers—in plain English”. Direct Market 64(4):54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoya T (2003) On the capability of accommodating new classes within probabilistic neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(2):450–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Srinivasan D, Cheu RL (2001) Classification of freeway traffic patterns for incident detection using constructive probabilistic neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12(5):1173–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonce DA, Fang C-H, Tsai S-C (1997) A data mining tool for learning from manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 33(1–2):27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D-R, Shih Y-Y (2005a) Integrating AHP and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value. Inf Manag 42(3):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D-R, Shih Y-Y (2005b) Hybrid approaches to product recommendation based on customer lifetime value and purchase preferences. J Syst Softw 77(2):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo VSY (2003) The true lift model—a novel data mining approach to response modeling in database marketing. ACM SIGKDD 4(2):78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty JA, Hastak M (2007) Segmentation approaches in data-mining: a comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic regression. J Bus Res 60(6):656–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miglautsch J (2002) Application of RFM principles: what to do with 1-1-1 customers? J Database Market 9(4):319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DL, Shih Y (2007) Introduction to business data mining. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih Y-Y, Liu C-Y (2003) A method for customer lifetime value ranking—combining the analytic hierarchy process and clustering analysis. Database Market Custom Strategy Manag 11(2):159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht DF (1990) Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw 3:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg B, Breur T (2007a) Merits of interactive decision tree building: Part 1. J Target Measur Anal Market 15(3):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg B, Breur T (2007b) Merits of interactive decision tree building: Part 2: How to do it. J Target Measur Anal Market 15(4):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef PC, Spring PN, Hoekstra JC, Leeflang PSH (2003) The commercial use of segmentation and predictive modeling techniques for database marketing in the Netherlands. Decis Support Syst 34(4):471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng SS, Chiu R-K, Wang B-J, Su S-H (2006/2007) The study and verification of a mathematical modeling for customer purchasing behavior. J Comput Inf Syst 47(2): 46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang AX (2004) How to develop new approaches to RFM segmentation. J Target Measur Anal Market 13(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun H, Ha D, Hwang B, Ryu KH (2003) Mining association rules on significant rare data using relative support. J Syst Softw 67:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Olson.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 9.

Table 9 Model results

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, D.L., Cao, Q., Gu, C. et al. Comparison of customer response models. Serv Bus 3, 117–130 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-009-0064-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-009-0064-8

Keywords

Navigation