Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing a relationship-based brand equity model

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop and test a model in which several aspects of the service encounter including service staff, servicescape, customer similarity, and customer interaction are taken into account simultaneously as antecedents of relationship quality and generation of brand equity. Testing the hypotheses involved two service settings, banks and department stores. The findings demonstrate that serviced staff and customer interaction have significant direct effects on brand equity. Surprisingly, four variables of service encounter have significant indirect effects through relationship quality on brand equity. Based on these findings, the implications for managers and future research are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker DA (1996) Measuring brand equity across product and markets. Calif Manag Rev 38(3):102–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams JW (2006) Striking it niche—extending the newspaper brand by capitalizing in new media niche markets: suggested model for achieving consumer brand loyalty. J Website Promot 2(1&2):163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman MB, Anuvia A, Goodwin C (1994) Beyond smiling: social support and service quality. In: Rust RT, Oliver RL (eds) Service quality: new directions in theory and practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal MK, Rao VR (1996) An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Mark Lett 7(3):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anantachart S (2004) Integrated marketing communications and market planning: Their implications to brand equity building. J Promot Manag 11(1):101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K, Zemke R (1991) Customer from hell. Training 26:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle J (2003) Amos™ 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JS, Overton ST (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron A, Fraley B (1999) Relationship closeness as including other in the self: cognitive underpinnings and measures. Soc Cogn 17:140–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron A, Fraley B, McLaughlin-Volpe T (2001) Including others in the self: extensions to own and partner’s group memberships. In: Sedikides C, Brewer MB (eds) Individual self, relational self, collective self. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry L (2000) Cultivating service brand equity. J Acad Mark Sci 28(1):128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2003) Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. J Mark 67(April):76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner MJ (1990) Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J Mark Res 54:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner MJ (1992) Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J Mark 56:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemer J, Odekerken-Schroder G (2002) Store satisfaction and store loyalty explained by customer- and store-related factors. J Consum Satisf Dissatisf Complain Behav 15:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen DE (1990) An interdisciplinary study of service: some progress, some prospects. J Bus Res 20:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne D, Clore G, Worchel P (1966) The effect of economic similarity dissimilarity as determinants of attraction. J Pers Soc Psychol 4:220–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo RN (1965) An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. J Mark Res 2:244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby LA, Evans KR, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J Mark 54(3):68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony L, Dall’Olmo Riley F (1998) Defining a “brand”: beyond the literature with experts’ interpretations. J Mark Manag 14:417–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney PM, Canon JP (1997) An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J Mark 61:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube L, Morin S (2001) Background music pleasure and store evaluation intensity effects and psychological mechanisms. J Bus Res 54:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation model with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox E, Montogmery A, Ledish L (2004) Consumer shopping and spending across retail formats. J Bus 77:525–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace D, O`Cass A (2005) An examination of the antecedents of repatronage intentions across different retail store formats. J Retail Consum Serv 12:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal D, Baker J, Levy M, Voss G (2006) The effects of wait expectations and store atmosphere evaluations on patronage intentions in service-intensive retail store. J Retail 79(4):259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C (2000) Service management and marketing. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson E, Glynn WJ, Barness JG (1995) Relationship marketing: its role in the service economy, understanding service management. Oak Tree Press, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RB (1993) Trust in relationship marketing: a foundation for building business. Manag Mag 68(6):14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman KD, Bateson JEG (1997) Essentials of services marketing. The Dryden Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman KD, Bateson JEG, Turley LW (2002) Atmospherics, service encounters and consumer decision making: an integrative perspective. J Mark Theory Pract 10(3):33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating B, Rugimbana R, Quazi A (2003) Differentiating between service quality and relationship quality in cyberspace. Manag Serv Qual 13(3):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney SM (1995) Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory study. J Mark 59:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LK (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark 57(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y (2001) The impact of brand equity and the company’s reputation on revenues: testing an IMC evaluation model. J Promot Manag 6(1/2):89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim WG, Cha Y (2002) Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality in hotel industry. Hosp Manag 21:321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Kim WG (2005) The relationship between brand equity and firms’ performance in luxury hotels and chain restaurants. Tour Manag 26:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, Kao DL (2004) The Impacts of country-of-origin on brand equity. J Am Acad Bus 5(1/2):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock C, Wirtz H (2004) Services marketing—peoples, technology, strategy, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, NJ, pp 285–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangleburg T, Doney P, Bristol T (2004) Shopping with friends and teen’ susceptibility to peer influence. J Retail 80(2):101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CL, Pranter AP (1989) Compatibility management customer-to-customer relationships in service environments. J Serv Mark 3:6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MI, Stewart DW (2001) The differential impact of goal congruency on attitudes, intentions, and the transfer of brand equity. J Mark Res 38:471–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila AS, Wirtz J (2001) Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior. J Retail 77:237–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvene LJ, Teal CR, Slavich S (2000) Including the other in self: implications for judgments of equity and satisfaction in close relationships. J Soc Clin Psychol 19:396–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark 58:20–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SE, Wilkie WL, Lutz RJ (2003) Passing the torch: intergenerational influences as a source of brand equity. J Mark 66:17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottram S (1998) Branding the corporation. In: Hart S, Murphy J (eds) Brands: the new wealth creators. New York University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass C, Lee KM (2000) Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarity-attraction. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2000, pp 330–335

  • Netemeyer RG, Krishnan B, Pullig C, Wang G, Yagci M, Dean D, Ricks J, Wirth F (2004) Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. J Bus Res 57(2):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL, DeSarbo WS (1988) Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. J Consum Res 14:495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen LL, Johnson MD (2003) Service equity, satisfaction, and loyalty: form transaction-specific to cumulative evaluations. J Serv Res 5(3):184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom AL, Iacobucci D (1998) The effects of guarantees on consumers’ evaluation of service. J Serv Mark 12(6):362–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad K, Dev CS (2000) Managing hotel brand equity—a customer-centric framework for assessing performance. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q 41(3):22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus A, Brandt DR (1995) Understanding your customers. Mark Tools 2(5):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Quatman T, Swanson C (2002) Academic self-disclosure in adolescence. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 128(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranaweera C, Prabhu J (2003) The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching barriers on customer retention in a continuous purchasing setting. Int J Serv Ind Manag 14(3/4):374–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard FY, Eric SR (2000) The effects of music in a retail setting on real and perceived shopping times. J Bus Res 49:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe R, Weitz BA (1982) The SOCO scale: a measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. J Mark Res 19:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz DE, Barnes BB (1999) Strategic brand communication campaigns. NTC Business Books, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman E, Mathur A, Smith RB (1997) Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychol Mark 14(4):361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J, Sabol B (2002) Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J Mark 66:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy MJ, Grewal D, Mangleburg T (2000) Retail environment, self-congruity, and retail patronage: an integrative model and a research agenda. J Bus Res 49(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB (1998) Buyer-seller relationships: similarity, relationship management, and quality. Psychol Mark 15(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderlund M, Rosengren S (2004) Dismantling ‘positive affect’ and its effects on customer satisfaction: an empirical examination of customer joy in a service encounter. J Consum Satisf Dissatisf Complain Behav 17:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon MR, Surprenant C, Czepiel JA, Gutman EG (1985) A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter. J Mark 49(1):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S (1968) Identity salience and role performance: the importance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. J Marriage Fam 30:558–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swait J, Erdem T, Louviere J, Dubelaar C (1993) The equalization price—a measure of consumer-perceived brand equity. Int J Res Mark 10(1):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan JE, Trawick FI, Suva DW (1985) How industrial salespeople gain customer trust. Ind Market Manag 14(3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RH (1978) The role and person. Am J Sociol 84:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KC, Spiro RL (1985) Communication style in the salesperson customer dyad. J Mark Res 12:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong A, Sohal A (2002) An examination of the relationship between trust, commitment and relationship quality. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 30(1):34–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo B, Donthu N, Lee S (2000) An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. J Acad Mark Sci 28(2):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that have helped in finalizing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Chang Hsu.

Appendix

Appendix

Samples and factor loading of measurement

Constructs

Samples

Items

Factor loading

Service staff

    Technical skill

The X personnel are knowledgeable enough to deal with all my questions

3

0.81

    Closeness

The X personnel are polite and friendly

3

0.82

    Disclosure

The X personnel attempt to establish a relationship with me

3

0.71

Servicescape

    Physical equipment

X’s physical equipment is one of the best in its industry

4

0.81

    Atmosphere

I can rely on there being a good atmosphere

6

0.76

Customer similarity

My dressing style is similar to other customers

3

0.87

Customer interaction

My interaction with other customers is easy

3

0.74

Relationship quality

    Trust

I can count on the X to be sincere

6

0.71

    Satisfaction

Overall, I am satisfied with shopping at X

5

0.85

Brand equity

    Brand loyalty

I am very loyal to X’s name

3

0.86

    Brand association

I am committed to my sales associate at X’s name

3

0.86

  1. All items were measured on five-point scales, “1 = strongly disagree” and “5 = strongly agree” as the anchors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, CH., Hsu, LC. & Fang, SR. Constructing a relationship-based brand equity model. Serv Bus 3, 275–292 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008-0062-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008-0062-2

Keywords

Navigation