Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What and how are we sharing? A systematic review of the sharing paradigm and practices

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sharing of resources, goods, services, experiences and knowledge is one of the fundamental practices that has been widely embedded in human nature. With the advance of information and communication technology, the realm of sharing has expanded drastically, which has led to the evolution of the ‘sharing paradigm’. In spite of the increasing attention on the new sharing phenomenon and its potential contribution to a sustainable and resilient society, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of varied sharing practices in the context of sustainability and resilience. This study maps out the academic landscape of sharing studies and examines what and how we share by a systematic literature review. Based on the review of 297 peer-reviewed papers, we explore the features of varied sharing practices identified in academia. We also discuss research gaps in sharing paradigm studies and the potential contribution of sharing to building sustainable and resilient societies. Our results show regional and sectoral imbalances in the sharing studies. The findings also illustrate that sharing of manufactured goods and accommodations, and access-based sharing with monetary compensation via intermediaries such as online platforms are predominant. Our evaluation provides a bird’s-eye view of existing sharing studies and practices, enabling the discovery of new opportunities for sustainable and resilient societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Adapted from McLaren and Agyeman (2015)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

adapted from McLaren and Agyeman (2015)

Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan 100(4):341–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbar P, Mai R, Hoffmann S (2016) When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems. J Bus Res 69(10):4215–4224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ala-Mantila S, Ottelin J, Heinonen J, Junnila S (2016) To each their own? The greenhouse gas impacts of intra-household sharing in different urban zones. J Clean Prod 135:356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albinsson PA, Perera BY (2009) From trash to treasure and beyond: the meaning of voluntary disposition. J Consum Behav 8(6):340–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albinsson PA, Perera BY (2012) Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events. J Consum Behav 11(4):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aptekar S (2016) Gifts among strangers: the social organization of freecycle giving. Soc Probl 63(2):266–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballus-Armet I, Shaheen SA, Clonts K, Weinzimmer D (2014) Peer-to-peer carsharing: exploring public perception and market characteristics in the San Francisco Bay area, California. Transp Res Record 2416(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balnaves M (2012) The Australian finance sector and social media: towards a history of the new banking. Media Int Aust 143(1):132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes SJ, Mattsson J (2016) Building tribal communities in the collaborative economy: an innovation framework. Prometheus 34(2):95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R (2007) Why not share rather than own? Ann Am Acad Polit Social Sci 611(1):126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R (2010) Sharing: Table 1. J Consum Res 36(5):715–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R (2014) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67(8):1595–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee M (2011) How bad are bananas?: the carbon footprint of everything. Greystone Books, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Boafo YA, Saito O, Jasaw GS, Otsuki K, Takeuchi K (2016) Provisioning ecosystem services-sharing as a coping and adaptation strategy among rural communities in Ghana’s semi-arid ecosystem. Ecosyst Serv 19:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

  • Boyko CT, Clune SJ, Cooper RF, Coulton CJ, Dunn NS, Pollastri S, Leach JM, Bouch CJ, Cavada M, De Laurentiis V, Goodfellow-Smith M (2017) How sharing can contribute to more sustainable cities. Sustainability 9(5):701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley K, Pargman D (2017) The sharing economy as the commons of the 21st century. Camb J Regions, Econ Soc 10(2):231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggeman D, Dehaene M (2017) Urban questions in the countryside? Urbanization and the collective consumption of electricity in early twentieth-century Belgium. Plan Perspect 32(3):309–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher E, Fieseler C, Lutz C (2016) What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee)—exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Comput Hum Behav 62:316–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buczynski B (2013) Sharing is good: how to save money, time and resources through collaborative consumption. New Society Publishers, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Butenko A (2016) Sharing energy: dealing with regulatory disconnection in Dutch energy law. Eur J Risk Regul 7(4):701–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci C, Sivo M Di (2017) Shareable city, regenerated by making. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 12(3):388–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasin F, von Hoffen M, Cramer M, Matzner M (2017) Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 16:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng D (2014) Is sharing really caring? A nuanced introduction to the peer economy. Policy Primer. http://static.opensocietyfoundations.org/misc/future-of-work/the-sharing-economy.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2018

  • Cheng M (2016) Current sharing economy media discourse in tourism. Ann Tour Res 60:111–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donini A, Forlivesi M, Rota A, Tullini P (2017) Towards collective protections for crowdworkers: Italy, Spain and France in the EU context. Transfer: Eur Rev Labour Res 23(2):207–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dredge D, Gyimóthy S (2015) The collaborative economy and tourism: critical perspectives, questionable claims and silenced voices. Tour Recreat Res 40(3):286–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows NT, Pitfield DE (2000) An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 5(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complesity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamari J, Sjoklint M, Ukkonen A (2016) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(9):2047–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen F (2017) Towards an intelligent network for matching offer and demand: from the sharing economy to the Global Brain. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 114:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and recepts. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber A (2017) Theorising the dynamics of collaborative consumption practices: a comparison of peer-to-peer accommodation and cohousing. Environ Innov Soc Transit 23:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ince A (2015) From middle ground to common ground: self-management and spaces of encounter in organic farming networks. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105(4):824–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • John NA (2013) The social logics of sharing. Commun Rev 16(3):113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiyama C, Hashimoto S, Kohsaka R, Saito O (2016) Non-market food provisioning services via homegardens and communal sharing in satoyama socio-ecological production landscapes on Japan’s Noto peninsula. Ecosyst Serv 17:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassan J, Orsi J (2012) The legal landscape of the sharing economy. J Environ Law Litigat 27(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Laamanen M, Wahlen S, Campana M (2015) Mobilising collaborative consumption lifestyles: a comparative frame analysis of time banking. J Consumer Stud 39(5):459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti VM, Selosmaa J (2013) A fair share: towards a new collaborative economy. Atena

  • Lampinen A, Huotari KJE, Cheshire C (2015) Challenges to participation in the sharing economy: the case of local online peer-to-peer exchange in a single parents’ network. Interaction Design and Architecture

  • Landreth N, Saito O (2014) An ecosystem services approach to sustainable livelihoods in the homegardens of Kandy, Sri Lanka. Aust Geographer 45(3):355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley P, Leyshon A (2017) Capitalizing on the crowd: the monetary and financial ecologies of crowdfunding. Environ Plan A 49(5):1019–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckner N, Fitzpatrick G, Werner K, Subasi Ö (2015) Setting up and running a sharing service: an organisational perspective. IXD&A 24:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Lund S, Bughin J, Robinson K, Mischke J, Mahajan D (2016) Independent work: choice, necessity, and the gig economy. McKinsey & Company

  • Martin CJ (2016) The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol Econ 121:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren D, Agyeman J (2015) Sharing cities: a case for truly smart and sustainable cities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Novel AS (2014) Is sharing more sustainable? The environmental promises of the sharing economy. Innovat Sustain Dev 139–144

  • Pedersen ERG, Netter S (2015) Collaborative consumption: business model opportunities and barriers for fashion libraries. J Fashion Market Manag 19(3):258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen L (2017) Sorting things out: a typology of the digital collaborative economy. First Monday 22:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer-Gillett A (2016) When “disruption” collides with accountability: holding ridesharing companies liable for acts of their drivers. Cal L Rev 104:233

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RL, Ormsby R (2016) Industry classification schemes: an analysis and review. J Bus Fin Librarianship 21(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Kohsaka R, Bieling C, Hashimoto S, Kamiyama C, Kizos T, Penker M, Kieninger P, Shaw BJ, Sioen GB, Yoshida Y (2018) Fostering biocultural diversity in landscapes through place-based food networks: a “solution scan” of European and Japanese models. Sustain Sci 13(1):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston F (2012) A global redesign? shaping the circular economy, energy, environment and resource governance. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/32547802/A_global_redesign_-_shaping_the_circular_economy.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId = AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires = 1534250859&Signature = YPQPPEbRzh9FYgM2k0D4V6tphYY%3D&response-content-disposition = inline%3B%20filename%3Dbriefing_paper_A_Global_Redesign_Shaping.pdf

  • Price JA (1975) Sharing: the integration of intimate economies. Anthropologica 3–27

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) (2015) The sharing economy. Consumer Intelligence Series

  • Ravenelle AJ (2017) Sharing economy workers: selling, not sharing. Camb J Regions, Econ Soc 10(2):281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution (2015) 70/1 on ‘‘transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development’’ adopted on 25 September 2015, paragraph 72

  • Retamal M (2017) Product-service systems in Southeast Asia: business practices and factors influencing environmental sustainability. J Clean Prod 143:894–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2001) The age of access: the new culture of hypercapitalism. Penguin

  • Roos D, Hahn R (2017) Does shared consumption affect consumers’ values, attitudes, and norms? a panel study. J Bus Res 77:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito O, Havas J, Shirai K, Kurisu K, Aramaki T, Hanaki K (2015) Non-market food provisioning services in Hachijo Island, Japan and their implications toward building a resilient island. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng, ser G Environ Res 71(6):349–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito O, Kamiyama C, Hashimoto S (2018) Non-market food provision and sharing in Japan’s socio-ecological production landscapes. Sustainability 10:213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schor JB (2017) Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent?: findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Camb J Regions, Econ Soc 10(2):263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen S, Chan N (2016) Mobility and the sharing economy: potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment 42(4):573–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K, Saito O, Lahoti S, Gondor D (2017) Growing up: 10 years of publishing sustainability science research. Sustain Sci 12:849–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thebault-Spieker J, Terveen L, Hecht B (2017) Toward a geographic understanding of the sharing economy: systemic biases in UberX and TaskRabbit. ACM Trans Comput Hum Inter (TOCHI) 24(3):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Todolí-Signes A (2017) The ‘gig economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: Eur Rev Lab Res 23(2):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolkach D, Chon KK, Xiao H (2016) Asia Pacific tourism trends: is the future ours to see? Asia Pac J Tour Res 21(10):1071–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tussyadiah IP (2015) An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015. Springer, Cham, pp 817–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussyadiah IP (2016) Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation. Int J Hosp Manag 55:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahyuningtyas SY (2016) The online transportation network in Indonesia: a pendulum between the sharing economy and ex ante regulation. Compet Regul Netw Ind 17(3-4):260–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Noe RA (2010) Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 20(2):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittel A (2011) Qualities of sharing and their transformations in the digital age. Int Rev Inf Ethics 15(9):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Marinova D, Guo X (2015) Resilience thinking: a renewed system approach for sustainability science. Sustain Sci 10(1):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonehara A, Saito O, Hayashi K, Nagao M, Yanagisawa R, Matsuyama K (2017) The role of evaluation for achieving the SDGs. Sustain Sci 12:969–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Our heartfelt thanks to Raffaela Kozar for her thorough proofreading of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-15-1, Japan’s Ministry of the Environment) and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) Number 15KT0027.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Global Forestry, Department of Forest Policy and Economics, National Institute of Forest Science, 57 Heogi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02455, Republic of Korea

    Hyeonju Ryu

  2. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, 5-53-70 Jingumae, Shibuya, Tokayo, 150-8925, Japan

    Mrittika Basu & Osamu Saito

Authors
  1. Hyeonju Ryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mrittika Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Osamu Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeonju Ryu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handled by Eiji Hosoda, Keio University, Japan.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 1.

Table 1 The number of publications on the key concepts of sharing paradigm by year
Full size table

Appendix 2

See Table 2.

Table 2 Shared goods and services by sector
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryu, H., Basu, M. & Saito, O. What and how are we sharing? A systematic review of the sharing paradigm and practices. Sustain Sci 14, 515–527 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0638-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0638-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation