Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Sustainability Science and Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent adoption of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) confirms once again the growing importance of indicators in the context of ‘evidence-based decision making’. A sound indicator framework can turn the SDGs and their targets into a management tool to help countries develop implementation strategies, allocate resources and monitor progress. Indicator-based assessments will be a cornerstone of measuring progress on the SDGs through to 2030 at national, regional, global and thematic levels. Recent examples of indicator-based assessments and reports present useful case studies on emerging practice in the context of the SDGs, providing insights into the approaches and methods being adopted to measure and report on progress on the SDGs. In this context, this paper presents the recent experience of the United Nations in undertaking an indicator-based assessment for the Arab Sustainable Development Report (ASDR). The paper presents the innovative conceptual framework and approach used in the ASDR for benchmarking progress and analysing trends. The approach firstly takes a thematic ‘snapshot’ of progress and trends over two decades across 56 sustainable development indicators; a nested, integrated conceptual framework is then applied for a more in-depth exploration of interlinkages and dynamics among the SDGs. The approach emphasises the need to place human dignity and well-being at the core of the analysis; linkages to the natural resource base; the importance of peace, governance and institutions as crosscutting factors; and the role of the means of implementation for addressing gaps. This novel approach can be transferred and adapted to other regional contexts, and it is particularly relevant for developing regions where data gaps and the absence of targets present methodological challenges for any assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators 2016. Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustaianble Development Goal Indicators, E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1, New York. The total number of indicators in the original proposal was 241; however, this was later revised down to 230 indicators by removing duplicates.

  2. Chapter 40, paragraph 40.4.

  3. Several of the authors this paper were lead authors of the ASDR and were responsible for the assessment reviewed in this paper.

  4. Several stakeholder meetings were held over the period 2013–2015 with regional governments, organisations and experts which discussed the SDGs and regional priorities as well as the proposed conceptual model for SDGs in the Arab region.

  5. The gap analysis was undertaken towards the end of 2014 and as such data up until 2014 were collected for this analysis. Data for 2015 were subsequently collected as part of the indicator-based assessment as it became available.

  6. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates; Least Developed Countries (LDCs): the Comoros, Djibouti, Mauritania, Somalia, the Sudan and Yemen; Maghreb: Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia; Mashreq: Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine and the Syrian Arab Republic.

  7. Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the ASDR provide the outcome of the narrative reviews. Annex 1 to the ASDR provides additional information on the preparatory process for the report.

  8. The region scored 3.5 out of 10 points on the Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index, which was below the global average of 5.3.

  9. Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) studied the MENA region which includes most of the Arab countries.

References

  • Böhringer C, Jochem PE (2007) Measuring the immeasurable—a survey of sustainability indices. Ecol Econ 63:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl AL (2012) Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecol Ind 17:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Duraiappah A, Managi S, Barbier E, Collins R, Fraumeni B, Gundimeda H, Liu G, Mumford K (2015) How to measure sustainable progress. Science 350:748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2014) Getting messages across using indicators: a handbook based on experience from assessing sustainable development indicators, Luxembourg

  • Geniaux G, Bellon S, Deverre C, Powell B (2006) Sustainable development indicator frameworks and initiatives

  • Geoghegan T (2013) Post-2015: framing a new approach to sustainable development, Policy Paper. Independent Research Forum on a Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda

  • Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013) Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495:305–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger B, Lussmann P (2010) Assessment of Sustainable Development and Environmental Indicators, Technical report School of Business of the University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten

  • Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators, 2016. Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators, E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1, New York

  • Le Blanc D (2015) Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustain Dev 23:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Managi S (2016) The wealth of nations and regions. Routledge

  • Mayer AL (2008) Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ Int 34:277–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melamed C, Ladd P (2013) How to build sustainable development goals: integrating human development and environmental sustainability in a new global agenda, Research reports and studies

  • Mori K, Christodoulou A (2012) Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environ Impact Assess Rev 32:94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M, Lucas P, Yoshida T (2013) Towards an integrated framework for SDGs: ultimate and enabling goals for the case of energy. Sustainability 5:4124–4151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinter L, Almassy D, Antonio E, Niestroy I, Olsen S, Pulawska G (2013) Sustainable development goals and indicators for a small planet

  • Raworth K (2012) A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut, Oxfam Policy and practice: climate change and resilience, pp 1–26

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 9:189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P (2010) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress

  • Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2013) An action agenda for sustainable development: report for the UN Secretary-General

  • Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2015) Indicators and a monitoring framework for the sustainable development goals, a report to the secretary-general of the United Nations by the Leadership Council of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York

  • United Nations (2012) League of Arab States, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative. Sustainable Development Indicators for the Arab Region, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2016) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016, New York

  • United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) Agenda 21, Rio Declaration. United Nations, New York

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies, Third Edition, New York

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2014) Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations on Measuring Sustainable Development, Geneva

  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, League of Arab States, 2013. The Arab Millennium Development Goals Report, Beirut

  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, United Nations Environment Programme, 2015. Arab Sustainable Development Report, Beirut

  • United Nations Secretary-General, 2013. Initial input of the Secretary-General to the Open Working Group on SDGs

  • Young OR, Underdal A, Kanie N, Andresen S, Bernstein S, Biermann F, Gupta J, Haas PM, Iguchi M, Kok M, Levy M, Nilsson M, Pinter L, Stevens C (2014) Earth system challenges and a multi-layered approach for the sustainable development goals. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia who led the development of the ASDR as well as the United Nations Environment Programme and the broad range of stakeholders and experts who contributed to the development of the ASDR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Allen.

Additional information

Handled by Shunsuke Managi, Tohoku University, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, C., Nejdawi, R., El-Baba, J. et al. Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region. Sustain Sci 12, 975–989 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0437-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0437-1

Keywords

Navigation