Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Envisioning the digital sustainability panopticon: a thought experiment of how big data may help advancing sustainability in the digital age

  • Note and Comment
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The starting point for a theoretical vision of digital big data and sustainability builds on the situation of a currently unsustainable world threatening present and future generations regarding all three dimensions of sustainability. Given the paradigmatic changes the era of Big Data brings about, this paper proposes a thought experiment based on Bentham’s panopticon theory, where real-time data availability offers technical opportunities to promote and transform sustainability in a preceded way. Hence, different panopticon theories are discussed and merged with the concept of sustainability to arrive at the concept of the Digital Sustainability Panopticon defined by six criteria. This vision is framed by the ten “quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science” (Wiek and Iwaniec 2014) and critically discussed regarding the totalitarian potential of digital surveillance and the paradox of freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson C (2008) The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete wired 16/07. http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory. Accessed 20 June 2015

  • Andrejevic M (2004) Reality tv: the work of being watched. Rowman & Littlefield, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z, Lyon D (2013) Liquid surveillance. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham J (1787) Panopticon, or, The Inspection-House. Dodo Press (reprint), Cornwall

  • Bjørn A, Bey N, Georg S, Røpke I, Hauschild M (2016) Is earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting? J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.095

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok A, Pedersen M (2014) Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a big data world. Big Data Soc 1(2):1–6. doi:10.1177/2053951714543908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne R (2000) Post-panopticism. Econ Soc 29(2):285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8086–8091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs T, Holladay S (2013) The pseudo-panopticon: the illusion created by CSR-related transparency and the internet. Corp Commun Int J 18(2):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson J, Fisher P (2007) The panopticon’s changing geography. Geogr Rev 97(3):307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing L (2008) Michel foucault. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1975) Discipline and punishment. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy O (1993) The panoptic sort: a political economy of personal information. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatti L, Seele P (2014) Evidence for the prevalence of the sustainability concept in European corporate responsibility reporting. Sustain Sci 9:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes C (2009) Computational sustainability: computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society. Bridge 39(4):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty K (2006) Tear down the walls lyon: theorizing surveillance. Panopt Beyond. Willan, Cullompton, pp 23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty E, Ericson R (2000) The surveillance assemblage. Br J Sociol 54(1):605–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Han B (2013) Im schwarm. ansichten des digitalen. Matthes & Seitz, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D (2012) The futur ict knowledge accelerator towards a more resilient and sustainable future. In: Ball P (ed) Why society is a complex matter. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb G (1965) The haunted house of Jeremy Bentham. In: Richard H, Harold Parker T (eds) Ideas in history: essays presented to louis gottschalk by his former students. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen O, Seele P (2013) An analysis of sovereign wealth and pension funds’ ethical investment guidelines and their commitment thereto. J Sustain Financ Invest 13(3/3):264–282. doi:10.1080/20430795.2013.791144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates R, Clark W, Corell R, Hall J, Jaeger C, Lowe I, McCarthy J, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson N, Faucheux S, Gallopin G, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jodha N, Kasperson R, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman J, Arico S (2014) New directions in sustainability science: promoting integration and cooperation. Sustain Sci 9(4):413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knebel S, Seele P (2015) Quo vadis GRI? a (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 a + non-financial reports and implications for credibility and standardization. Corp Commun Int J 20(2):196–212. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri N (2014) The emerging role of big data in key development issues: opportunities, challenges, and concerns. Big Data Soc 1(2):1–20. doi:10.1177/2053951714564227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagoze C (2014) Big data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone. Big Data Soc 1(2):2053951714558281. doi:10.1177/2053951714558281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubin D, Esty D (2014) Bridging the sustainability gap. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev 55(4):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (2006) Theorizing surveillance: the panopticon and beyond. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (2014) Surveillance, snowden, and big data: capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data Soc 1(2):2053951714541861. doi:10.1177/2053951714541861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen T (1997) The viewer society. michel foucault’s panopticon revisited. Theor Criminol 1(2):215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller O, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2013) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock S (2014) How web tracking changes user agency in the age of big data: the used user. Big Data Soc 1(2):1–11. doi:10.1177/2053951714564228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt E, Cohen J (2013) The new digital age. Reshaping the future of people, nations and business. Knopf, New York

  • Seele P (2012) Triple-profitability-bottom line: supplier responsibility in a multistakeholder perspective and the power of the markets in the apple-foxconn case. In: Working Papers des CRR, vol 11, Essen. http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-31304/WP_11_Triple_Profitability_Bottom_Line.pdf

  • Seele P (2016) Digitally unified reporting how XBRL-based real-time transparency helps in combining integrated sustainability reporting and performance control. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.102

  • Shanahan M (2015) The technological singularity. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko A, Lévesque M, Pagell M (2016) Why firms delay reaching true sustainability. J Manag Stud. doi:10.1111/joms.12199

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2016) Security council presidential statement seeks counter-terrorism committee proposal for ‘International Framework’ to curb incitement 11 May 2016 SC/12355. http://www.un.org/press/en/2016/sc12355.doc.htm. Accessed 21 May 2016

  • van der Helm R (2009) The vision phenomenon: towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures 41:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson LA, Monterio BJ (2011) The next stage in the evolution of business reporting—the journey towards an interlinked, integrated report. Chart Account 75–78

  • Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2014) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 9(4):497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (1984) In the age of the smart machine. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwitter A (2014) Big data ethics. Big Data Soc 1(2). doi:10.1177/2053951714559253

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Via Buffi 13, Lugano, 6904, Switzerland

    Peter Seele

Authors
  1. Peter Seele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Seele.

Additional information

Handled by Osamu Saito, United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seele, P. Envisioning the digital sustainability panopticon: a thought experiment of how big data may help advancing sustainability in the digital age. Sustain Sci 11, 845–854 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0381-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0381-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation