Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subjective realities of climate change: how mental maps of impacts deliver socially sensible adaptation options

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the perceived impacts of weather-related extreme events on different social groups in New Delhi, India. Using network statistics and scenario analysis with the Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping as part of a vulnerability analysis, the investigation provides quantitative and qualitative measures to compare impacts and adaptation strategies for different social groups. Impacts of rain events and heat waves are considered and differ across groups. Rain events affect the lower income classes more, while heat waves are the bigger burden for higher income classes. Overall, the strength of perceived impacts is larger for lower income classes, directly threatening their daily incomes. Urban managers have no immediate feedback on their livelihood, but often refer to health issues. The strongest effect on ameliorating burdens is investments in schemes to ease traffic, e.g., by improving the sewage and drainage infrastructure paired with other supply side measures to enable transport of goods for lower income classes during rain. During heat events, improving the water supply situation would reduce burden for all, while constant electricity supply is an effective means in reducing burden for the higher income classes in particular. Our analysis suggests that improvements in the water supply and sewage infrastructure would be the most suitable first step to initiate a well-planned adaptation strategy for all social groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other studies have applied a Likert scale asking the interviewees about the strength of influence, e.g., very small, small, medium, strong, and very strong. The expressions were only later converted into weights. We let the interviewees use numbers and tried different possibilities, e.g., weights between −10 and 10 and between 0 and 10. The solution to use numbers between 0 and 1 worked best, although using numbers in general seemed to be difficult for a good share of the interviewees.

References

  • Adger WN, Barnett J (2009) Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change. Environ Plan A 41:2800–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger N, Kelly M (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 4:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala S (2004) Adaptation, development assistance and planning: challenges and opportunities. IDS Bull 35:50–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskog H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation a question of multilevel governance? Environ Plan C 28:276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aßheuer T, Braun B, Schüttemeyer A, Schüttemeyer D, Simmer C, Thiele-Eich I (2009) Social and economic adaptation to climate change: brickfields and informality in the face of natural hazards in Dhaka. In: 5th Urban Research Symposium: Cities and climate change—responding to an urgent agenda, Marseille, France, 28–30 June 2009

  • Bachhofer M, Wildenberg M (2010) FCmapper software. http://fcmappers.net. Accessed 10 February 2010

  • Barreteau O (2003) The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: characterization of associations. J Artif Soc Soc Simulation 6. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/3.html

  • Birkmann J, Garschagen M, Kraas F, Quang N (2010) Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustain Sci 5:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butsch C, Etzold B, Sakdapolrak P (2009) The Megacity Resilience Framework. Bonn. Census of India (2011) Provisional Population Totals. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/prov_data_products_delhi.html. Accessed 16 February 2012

  • Cross JA (2001) Megacities and small towns: different perspectives on hazard vulnerability. Environ Hazards 3:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75:301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JC (2010) Vulnerability, capacity, and resilience: perspectives for climate and development policy. J Int Dev 22:218–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaube V, Kaiser C, Wildenberg M, Adensam H, Fleissner P, Kobler J, Lutz J, Schaumberger A, Schaumberger J, Smetschka B, Wolf A, Richter A, Haberl H (2009) Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Austria. Landscape Ecol 24:1149–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss A (1967) Discovery of grounded theory—strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2008) Eleventh Five Year Plan. http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/11th/11_v3/11v3_ch10.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2011

  • India Meteorological Department (2011) Climatological data of important cities. http://www.imd.gov.in/doc/climateimp.pdf. Accessed 02 May 2011

  • Kahn MS, Quaddus M (2004) Group decision support using fuzzy cognitive maps for causal reasoning. Group Decis Negot 13:463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar U, Kumar Narula K, Prakash Sharma V, Chandna U (2008) Vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and water stress in Uttarakhand State, India. Global Environ Change 18:564–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok K (2009) The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development with an example from Brazil. Global Environ Change 19:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Mach Stud 24:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraas F (2007) Megacities and global change in East, Southeast and South Asia. Asien 103:9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysanova V, Dickens C, Timmerman J, Varela-Ortega C, Schlüter M, Roest K, Huntjens P, Jaspers F, Buiteveld H, Moreno E, de Carrera Pedraza J, Slamova R, Martinkova M, Blanko I, Esteve P, Pringle K, Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P (2010) Cross-comparison of climate change adaptation strategies across large River Basins in Europe, Africa and Asia. Water Resour Manag 24:4121–4160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke MKB, Reckien D, Petschel-Held G (2004) Modellierung von Urban Sprawl am Beispiel von Leipzig. In: Nuissl H, Rink D (eds) Schrumpfung und Urban Sprawl—Analytische und Planerische Problemstellungen. UFZ-Diskussionspapiere 3, Leipzig, pp 7–18

  • Lüdeke MKB, Budde M, Kit O, Reckien D (2010) Climate Change scenarios for Hyderabad: integrating uncertainties and consolidation. http://www.sustainable-hyderabad.de. Accessed 28 May 2011

  • McEvoy D, Matczak P, Banaszak I, Chorynski A (2010) Framing adaptation to climate-related extreme events. Mitig AdapT Glob 15:779–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser C, Satterthwaite D (2008) Towards pro-poor adaptation to climate change in the urban centres of low- and middle-income countries. In: IIED Human Settlements Working Paper Nov 2008, London. http://www.iied.org/pubs/search.php?c=climate. Accessed 10 October 2010

  • O’Brien K, Leichenko R (2000) Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Change 10:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and economic globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ospina AV, Heeks R (2010) Linking ICTs and climate change adaptation: A conceptual framework for eResilience and eAdaptation. Centre for Development Informatics, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/cdi. Accessed 20 September 2010

  • Özesmi U, Özesmi SL (2004) Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol Model 176:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) (2007) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Patt A, Schröter D (2008) Perceptions of climate risk in Mozambique: implications for the success of adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Change 18:458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Change 15:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckien D, Kit O, Hofmann S (2008) Qualitative climate change impacts networks for Hyderabad/India. http://www.sustainable-hyderabad.de. Accessed 28 May 2011

  • Reckien D, Wildenberg M, Deb K (2010) Understanding climate change impacts and adaptation options in Indian megacities. In: Otto-Zimmermann K (ed) Resilient cities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter D, Polsky C, Patt AG (2005) Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 10:573–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R (2009) Wastewater related risks and social vulnerability: a case study of Delhi. In: Bohle HG, Warner K (eds) Megacities: resilience and social vulnerability. SOURCE 10, Bonn, pp 121–129

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: system thinking and modeling for a complex World. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylios CD, Georgopoulos VC, Malandraki GA, Chouliara S (2008) Fuzzy cognitive map architectures for medical decision support systems. Appl Soft Comput 8:1243–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundarshan RM (2009) Policy Research and Practice in India, ICCT Working Paper 2009/1. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/india/policyresearchandpracticeinindiasundarshan.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2011

  • TERI (2007) Adaptation to Climate Change in the context of Sustainable Development. Background Paper to the conference “Climate Change and Sustainable Development: An international workshop to strengthen research and understanding”, 7-8 April 2006, The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi. www.teriin.org/events/docs/adapt.pdf Accessed 20 June 2010

  • TERI (2012) Earth sciences and climate change—vision statement and overview. http://www.teriin.org/index.php?option=com_division&task=view_div&id=26. Accessed 16 February 2012

  • Thomas DSG, Twyman C (2005) Equity and justice in climate change adaptation amongst natural-resource-dependent societies. Global Environ Change 15:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ, Downing TE, Kuik OJ, Smith JB (2004) Distributional aspects of climate change impacts. Global Environ Change 14:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wildenberg M, Bachhofer M, Adamescu M, De Blust G, Diaz-Delgadod R, Isak K, Skov F, Varjopuro R (2010) Linking thoughts to flows - Fuzzy cognitive mapping as tool for integrated landscape modelling. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Integrative Landscape Modelling. Symposcience, Cemagref, Cirad, Ifremer, Inra, Montpellier. http://www.symposcience.org/exl-php/articles/651-article.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2010

  • World Bank (2010): Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change: Social Dimensions. http://climatechange.worldbank.org/content/social-dimensions-adaptation-climate-change. Accessed 17 February 2012

  • Yaman D, Polat S (2009) A fuzzy cognitive map approach for effect based operations: an illustrative case. Inform Sci 179:382–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young KD, Kibler DF, Benham BL, Loganathan GV (2009) Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of storm-water BMPs. J Water Resource Planning Manage 135:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was part of the Climate Science and Policy Program of the TERI University in New Delhi/India. We want to thank MSc students Anubha Agrawal, Deepika Duggal, Tashina Esteves, Shreya Garg, Abhishek Nair, Drishya Nair, Pallavi Sharma, Seema D. Venkatesh, and Padma Wangmo and Dr Kamna Sachdeva as well as Rajiv Seth for their support. We also thank all interviewees. This study was funded partly by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) grant 01LG0506E.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Reckien.

Additional information

Handled by Osamu Saito, Institute for Sustainability and Peace (UNU-ISP), Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reckien, D., Wildenberg, M. & Bachhofer, M. Subjective realities of climate change: how mental maps of impacts deliver socially sensible adaptation options. Sustain Sci 8, 159–172 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0179-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0179-z

Keywords

Navigation