INTRODUCTION
Benzodiazepines can be an effective short-term adjunct for psychiatric conditions managed in the outpatient setting.1 Recent studies on benzodiazepine prescribing reveal increases in concurrent opioid prescribing2 and prescribing in the ambulatory setting.3 Other reports document increase overdose mortality from benzodiazepines over the past decade secondary to concurrent opioid use.4 Despite this, less is known about how individuals use benzodiazepines over time. Without knowing how individuals use this medication, the abovementioned measures may overestimate benzodiazepine use. We thus sought to describe benzodiazepine use among the adult population using longitudinal cohort data.
METHODS
A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2002–2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).5 MEPS is an annual survey that is nationally representative of the noninstitutionalized US population and collects demographics, self-reported medical conditions, health indicators, and prescription medication use. This study utilized the longitudinal survey, which tracked individuals for 2 years who were interviewed five times.
Adults (≥ 18 years old) alive through the entirety of the 2 years were included. Benzodiazepine fills were identified by both therapeutic classification category and prescription medication name (temazepam, alprazolam, lorazepam, chlordiazepoxide, clonazepam, clorazepam, diazepam, estazolam, flurazepam, oxazepam, triazolam). Benzodiazepine fills were adjusted to 15 if more than 15 fills were reported.
Adjusted Wald test and chi-squared statistic were used for bivariate analyses. Simple linear regression was used to determine the relationship between first- and second-year benzodiazepine fills. A multivariable logistic regression was used to predict any benzodiazepine use in year 2 based on the number of benzodiazepine fills in year 1 (interaction between benzodiazepine fills). STATA 15 (STATA Corp.) and survey weighting were used for analyses. The OhioHealth Institutional Review Board ruled the study to be exempt.
RESULTS
The study included 154,171 adults. The rates of chronic benzodiazepine use (both > 2 fills in both years and any fills in both years) increased throughout the study period (Fig. 1). The rate of individual benzodiazepine use (> 2 fills in both years) increased from 1.8% (95%CI 1.5–2.1) in 2002–2003 to 2.4% (95%CI 2.1–2.8) in 2015–2016; however, the rate of individuals who reported benzodiazepines for a single year was unchanged at 1% per year. Any benzodiazepine filled in both years also increased from 2.8% (95%CI 2.4–3.2) in 2002–2003 to 3.9% (95%CI 3.5–4.4) in 2015–2016, while the rate of individuals reporting a fill in a single year was unchanged at 1.8%.
In bivariate analyses, individuals without benzodiazepine fills were more likely to be younger, male, white (non-Hispanic), and of middle to high income, and to have a higher mental component score on the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) (Table 1). Individuals who reported benzodiazepine fills over 2 years compared with a single year were overall similar. The number of fills in the first year was correlated with that in the second year (R2 = 0.62). The likelihood of any benzodiazepine filled in the second year increased from 36% (95%CI 33–39) at 2 fills to ≥ 86% in the second year with ≥ 4 fills.
DISCUSSION
Using nationally representative data over a 14 year period found that the increase in benzodiazepine prescriptions is related to a small increase in the number of long-term users, which might have decreased in 2015–2016. Predictors of long-term use were similar to those of previous studies,4,6 namely, non-Caucasian White patients, female sex, and lower income.
This study was limited by self-reported medication use, and short-term medications are likely underreported.
Recent studies have focused on benzodiazepine prescribing overtime by studying change in total outpatient visits,3, 6 which are likely overestimating use of this medication. In contrast, the results of our study suggest comparatively lower rates and lower rates of changes of benzodiazepine use. Additionally, the increased trends were mostly isolated to an increase use in the number of long-term users. Focusing on data related to change in visits overtime or cross-sectional time points may lead to incomplete understanding of prescribing patterns, which could have deleterious effects through health policy.
References
Locke AB, Kirst N, Shultz C. Diagnosis and management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91:617–24.
Ladapo JA, Larochelle MR, Chen A, et al. Physician prescribing of opioids to patients at increased risk of overdose from benzodiazepine use in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:623–630.
Agarwal SD, Landon BE. Patterns in outpatient benzodiazepine prescribing in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e187399.
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse. Overdose Death Rates. Revised January 2019. Available at https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates. Accessed April 4, 2019.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends MEPS HC-181: 2016 Full Year Consolidated Data File. https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h192/h192doc.pdf. Published August 2018. Accessed January 2019.
Kroll DS, Nieva HR, Barsky AJ, Linder JA. Benzodiazepines are prescribed more frequently to patients already at risk for benzodiazepine-related adverse events in primary care. J Gen Int Med. 2016;31:1027–1034.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The OhioHealth Institutional Review Board ruled the study to be exempt.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johansen, M.E., Niforatos, J.D. Benzodiazepine Use in the USA Is Driven by Long-term Users: a Repeated Cross-sectional Study of MEPS 2002–2016. J GEN INTERN MED 34, 2717–2719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05042-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05042-2