Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Healthcare Systems’ Disclosures of Large-Scale Adverse Events: A Department of Veterans Affairs Leadership, Policymaker, Research and Stakeholder Partnership

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandates disclosure of large-scale adverse events to patients, even if risk of harm is not clearly present. Concerns about past disclosures warranted further examination of the impact of this policy.

OBJECTIVE

Through a collaborative partnership between VA leaders, policymakers, researchers and stakeholders, the objective was to empirically identify critical aspects of disclosure processes as a first step towards improving future disclosures.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants at nine VA facilities where recent disclosures took place.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-seven stakeholders participated in the interviews: 38 employees, 28 leaders (from facilities, regions and national offices), 27 Veteran patients and family members, and four congressional staff members.

APPROACH

Facility and regional leaders were interviewed by telephone, followed by a two-day site visit where employees, patients and family members were interviewed face-to-face. National leaders and congressional staff also completed telephone interviews. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment processes. Themes were mapped to the stages of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication model: pre-crisis, initial event, maintenance, resolution and evaluation.

KEY RESULTS

Many areas for improvement during disclosure were identified, such as preparing facilities better (pre-crisis), creating rapid communications, modifying disclosure language, addressing perceptions of harm, reducing complexity, and seeking assistance from others (initial event), managing communication with other stakeholders (maintenance), minimizing effects on staff and improving trust (resolution), and addressing facilities’ needs (evaluation).

CONCLUSIONS

Through the partnership, five recommendations to improve disclosures during each stage of communication have been widely disseminated throughout the VA using non-academic strategies. Some improvements have been made; other recommendations will be addressed through implementation of a large-scale adverse event disclosure toolkit. These toolkit strategies will enable leaders to provide timely and transparent information to patients and families, while reducing the burden on employees and the healthcare system during these events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Institute of Medicine. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary (IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine). National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.; 2007.

  2. Dudzinski DM, Hebert PC, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. The disclosure dilemma—Large scale adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:978–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prouty CD, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. Patients’ experiences with disclosure of a large-scale adverse event. J Clin Ethics. 2013;24:353–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1004.08, Disclosure of Adverse Events to Patients, Washington, D.C., October 2, 2012.

  5. Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Handbook 1050.1 VHA National Patient Safety Improvement Handbook. January 30, 2002.

  6. Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality EnOverview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series. Impl Sci. 2008;3:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reynolds B, Seeger MW. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. J Health Comm. 2005;10:43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Department of Veterans Affairs, Strategic Performance Plan, Fiscal Year 2014–2020, Washington, D.C. http://www.va.gov/performance/ Accessed August 26, 2014.

  9. Elwy AR, Maguire EM, Bokhour BG, Gifford AL, Asch SM, Wagner T, Gallagher T, Burgess J, Durfee JM, Martinello R. Communicating Large Scale Adverse Events: Lessons from Media Reactions to Risk: White Paper. Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service, September 2012.

  10. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Melani Christian L. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 3rd ed, 2009.

  11. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA

  12. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

  13. Utarini A, Winkvist A, Pelto GH. Appraising Studies in Health Using Rapid Assessment Procedures (RAP): Eleven Critical Criteria. Human Organization. 2001;60(4):390–400.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The American Legion. VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System. System Worth Saving Report. November 5–6, 2013. http://www.legion.org/publications/218184/2013-sws-report-va-pittsburgh-healthcare-system Accessed August 26, 2014.

  15. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Impl Sci. 2013;8:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service, SDR 11–440. The views, opinions, and content of this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Drs. Elwy, Bokhour, Maguire, Asch and Gifford are supported by the HIV/Hepatitis Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Veterans Health Administration.

Dr. Elwy is also an investigator with the Implementation Research Institute, at the George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, through an award from the National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH080916-01A2) and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative.

Conflicts of Interests

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rani Elwy Ph.D..

Additional information

RLJ is now in another position with the VHA. SS has retired.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elwy, A.R., Bokhour, B.G., Maguire, E.M. et al. Improving Healthcare Systems’ Disclosures of Large-Scale Adverse Events: A Department of Veterans Affairs Leadership, Policymaker, Research and Stakeholder Partnership. J GEN INTERN MED 29 (Suppl 4), 895–903 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3034-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3034-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation