Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of New Clinical Programs in the VHA Healthcare System: The Importance of Early Collaboration Between Clinical Leadership and Research

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Collaboration between policy, research, and clinical partners is crucial to achieving proven quality care. The Veterans Health Administration has expended great efforts towards fostering such collaborations. Through this, we have learned that an ideal collaboration involves partnership from the very beginning of a new clinical program, so that the program is designed in a way that ensures quality, validity, and puts into place the infrastructure necessary for a reliable evaluation. This paper will give an example of one such project, the Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project (LCSDP). We will outline the ways that clinical, policy, and research partners collaborated in design, planning, and implementation in order to create a sustainable model that could be rigorously evaluated for efficacy and fidelity. We will describe the use of the Donabedian quality matrix to determine the necessary characteristics of a quality program and the importance of the linkage with engineering, information technology, and clinical paradigms to connect the development of an on-the-ground clinical program with the evaluation goal of a learning healthcare organization. While the LCSDP is the example given here, these partnerships and suggestions are salient to any healthcare organization seeking to implement new scientifically proven care in a useful and reliable way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Vogt TM, Elston-Lafata J, Tolsma D, Greene SM. The role of research in integrated healthcare systems: the HMO Research Network. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(9):643–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hays MT. A Historical Look at the Establishment of the Department of Veterans Affairs Research and Development Program. Washington: Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research & Development; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Platt R, Davis R, Finkelstein J, Go AS, Gurwitz JH, Roblin D, et al. Multicenter epidemiologic and health services research on therapeutics in the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(5):373–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G, Field TS, Fletcher S, Geiger AM, et al. Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kupersmith J, Eisen S. A new approach to health services research. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(13):1033–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, Agyepong IA, Tran N. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ. 2013;347:f6753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The national lung screening trial: Results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer. 2013.

  10. Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E Jr, Colditz GA, Church TR, Ettinger DS, et al. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(2):107–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moyer VA. Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013.

  12. Sox HC. Better evidence about screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):455–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris RP, Sheridan SL, Lewis CL, Barclay C, Vu MB, Kistler CE, et al. The harms of screening: a proposed taxonomy and application to lung cancer screening. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):281–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bach PB, Gould MK. When the average applies to no one: personalized decision making about potential benefits of lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(8):571–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Detterbeck FC, Unger M. Screening for Lung Cancer: Moving Into a New Era. Annals of internal medicine. 2013.

  16. Heuvers ME, Wisnivesky J, Stricker BH, Aerts JG. Generalizability of results from the National Lung Screening Trial. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012.

  17. EF, Jr., Pinsky P, Gatsonis C, Sicks JD, Kramer BS, Tammemagi MC, et al. Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer. JAMA Int Med. 2013.

  18. Hamlett-Berry K, Christofferson DE, Martinello RA. Smoking and tobacco use within the Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zullig LL, Jackson GL, Dorn RA, Provenzale DT, McNeil R, Thomas CM, et al. Cancer incidence among patients of the U.S. Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Mil Med. 2012;177(6):693–701.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Volume 1. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McLaughlin CP. Evaluating the quality control system for managed care in the United States. Qual Manag Health Care. 1998;7(1):38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci: IS. 2009;4:67.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci. 2014;9:7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weiner BJ, Lewis MA, Linnan LA. Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(2):292–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson GL, Melton LD, Abbott DH, Zullig LL, Ordin DL, Grambow SC, et al. Quality of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3176–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson GL, Zullig LL, Zafar SY, Powell AA, Ordin DL, Gellad ZF, et al. Using NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology to measure the quality of colorectal cancer care in the veterans health administration. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(4):431–41.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kupersmith J, Francis J, Kerr E, Krein S, Pogach L, Kolodner RM, et al. Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff. 2007;26(2):w156–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Veterans Health Administration through the National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest. All authors are employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ryanne Wu MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, R.R., Kinsinger, L.S., Provenzale, D. et al. Implementation of New Clinical Programs in the VHA Healthcare System: The Importance of Early Collaboration Between Clinical Leadership and Research. J GEN INTERN MED 29 (Suppl 4), 825–830 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3026-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3026-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation