Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Envisioning a Social-Health Information Exchange as a Platform to Support a Patient-Centered Medical Neighborhood: A Feasibility Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Social determinants directly contribute to poorer health, and coordination between healthcare and community-based resources is pivotal to addressing these needs. However, our healthcare system remains poorly equipped to address social determinants of health. The potential of health information technology to bridge this gap across the delivery of healthcare and social services remains unrealized.

OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted in-depth, in-person interviews with 50 healthcare and social service providers to determine the feasibility of a social-health information exchange (S-HIE) in an urban safety-net setting in Dallas County, Texas. After completion of interviews, we conducted a town hall meeting to identify desired functionalities for a S-HIE.

APPROACH

We conducted thematic analysis of interview responses using the constant comparative method to explore perceptions about current communication and coordination across sectors, and barriers and enablers to S-HIE implementation. We sought participant confirmation of findings and conducted a forced-rank vote during the town hall to prioritize potential S-HIE functionalities.

KEY RESULTS

We found that healthcare and social service providers perceived a need for improved information sharing, communication, and care coordination across sectors and were enthusiastic about the potential of a S-HIE, but shared many technical, legal, and ethical concerns around cross-sector information sharing. Desired technical S-HIE functionalities encompassed fairly simple transactional operations such as the ability to view basic demographic information, visit and referral data, and medical history from both healthcare and social service settings.

CONCLUSIONS

A S-HIE is an innovative and feasible approach to enabling better linkages between healthcare and social service providers. However, to develop S-HIEs in communities across the country, policy interventions are needed to standardize regulatory requirements, to foster increased IT capability and uptake among social service agencies, and to align healthcare and social service priorities to enable dissemination and broader adoption of this and similar IT initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization CoSDoH. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradley EH, Elkins BR, Herrin J, Elbel B. Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(10):826–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC health disparities and inequalities report--United States 2013.

  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Health Care’s Blind Side: The Overlooked Connection Between Social Needs and Good Health. 2011.

  5. Kushel MB, Gupta R, Gee L, Haas JS. Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1):71–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frequent Users of Health Services Initiative. Summary Report of Evaluation Findings: A Dollars and Sense Strategy to Reducing Frequent Use of Hospital Services. October 2008.

  7. Hwang SW, Henderson MJ. Health Care Utilization in Homeless People: Translating Research into Policy and Practice. 2010. AHRQ Contract No. 10002.

  8. Etz RS, Cohen DJ, Woolf SH, Holtrop JS, Donahue KE, Isaacson NF, et al. Bridging primary care practices and communities to promote healthy behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5 Suppl):S390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dymek C, Johnson M, Mardon R, Hassell S, Carpenter D, McGinnis P, et al. Clinical-Community Relationship Measures (CCRM) Atlas. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2013. AHRQ Publication No. 13-0041-EF.

  10. Isham GJ, Zimmerman DJ, Kindig DA, Hornseth GW. HealthPartners adopts community business model to deepen focus on nonclinical factors of health outcomes. Health Aff. 2013;32(8):1446–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Council on Aging. MD Link: Partnering physicians with community-based organizations. A toolkit to help physicians educate their colleagues on collaborating with community-based organizations that serve older adults. 2005.

  12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Coordinating Care in the Medical Neighborhood: Critical Components and Available Mechanisms. 2011 Contract No. 11–0064.

  13. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1775–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011. Washington, DC: 2011.

  15. Magnan S, Fisher E, Kindig D, Isham G, Wood D, Eustis M, et al. Achieving accountability for health and health care. Minn Med. 2012;95(11):37–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearson ML, Wu S, Schaefer J, Bonomi AE, Shortell SM, Mendel PJ, et al. Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(4):978–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. Health Aff. 2009;28(1):75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Porterfield DS, Hinnant LW, Kane H, Horne J, McAleer K, Roussel A. Linkages between clinical practices and community organizations for prevention: a literature review and environmental scan. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(Suppl 3):S375–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandopulle R, Patel N. How the electronic health record did not measure up to the demands of our medical home practice. Health Aff. 2010;29(4):622–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff. 2010;29(4):614–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuperman GJ. Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(5):678–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Beacon Community Program. Available from: http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/beacon-community-program. Accessed 20 Jun 2014.

  23. Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Health Leads. A New Vision for Healthcare in America. Available from: http://www.healthleadsusa.org/. Accessed 20 Jun 2014.

  25. Eggleston EM, Finkelstein JA. Finding the role of health care in population health. JAMA. 2014.

  26. Shortell SM. Bridging the divide between health and health care. JAMA. 2013;309(11):1121–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. California HealthCare Foundation. Ten Years In: Charting the Progress of Health Information Exchange in the U.S. February 2014. Available at: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2014/02/ten-years-charting-hie. Accessed 20 Jun 2014.

  28. Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. Operational health information exchanges show substantial growth, but long-term funding remains a concern. Health Aff. 2013;32(8):1486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Clarkson Davis for their central role in building community partnerships; and Ethan Halm, MD, MPH (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) for his mentorship, guidance, and support.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the W.W. Caruth, Jr. Foundation of the Communities Foundation of Texas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oanh Kieu Nguyen MD, MAS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, O.K., Chan, C.V., Makam, A. et al. Envisioning a Social-Health Information Exchange as a Platform to Support a Patient-Centered Medical Neighborhood: A Feasibility Study. J GEN INTERN MED 30, 60–67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2969-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2969-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation