ABSTRACT
The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has undertaken a major initiative to transform primary care delivery through implementation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs). Based on the patient-centered medical home concept, PACTs aim to improve access, continuity, coordination, and comprehensiveness using team-based care that is patient driven and patient centered. However, how PACT principles should be applied to meet the needs of special populations, including women veterans, is not entirely clear. While historical differences in military participation meant women veterans were rarely seen in VA healthcare settings, they now represent the fastest growing segment of new VA users. They also have complex healthcare needs, adding gender-specific services and other needs to the spectrum of services that the VA must deliver. These trends are changing the VA landscape, introducing challenges to how VA care is organized, how VA providers need to be trained, and how VA considers implementation of new initiatives, such as PACT. We briefly describe the evolution of VA primary care delivery for women veterans, review VA policy for delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive primary care for women, and discuss the challenges that women veterans’ needs pose in the context of PACT implementation. We conclude with recommendations for addressing some of these challenges moving forward.
Similar content being viewed by others
INTRODUCTION
Patient-centered medical homes have been shown to improve quality of care and patient, provider, and staff satisfaction, while reducing costs.1 , 2 The VA has mandated national implementation of its medical home model—Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs), which focus on continuity through team-based care, patient access, care management/coordination, and patient-centered communication.3
VA leaders have increasingly begun to explore how and when PACT should be adapted for special populations based, for example, on age, gender, or condition. The purpose of this article is to describe the evolution of primary care (PC) for one of those special populations, women veterans, review VA policy on delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive PC for women, and discuss implications of women’s complex care needs for PACT implementation.
Why Women Veterans?
Unlike the typically balanced gender mix of practices outside the VA, women veterans represent a numerical minority, at about 7 % of VA users. Their numbers have created proficiency challenges among VA providers and logistical and fiscal challenges to delivering comprehensive PC in gender-sensitive environments that take account of women’s military roles/experiences and complex healthcare needs.3 – 5 Women VA users have higher mental health burdens than their male counterparts, including high rates of exposure to military sexual trauma, which require trauma-sensitive approaches to care and special attention to the safety and security of clinic environments.6 – 8 Their quality of care has also lagged behind that of men,9 and they typically have to seek multiple visits within and outside the VA to achieve the level of care men achieve through a single on-site visit.10 – 11
Evolution of VA Primary Care for Women
The VA healthcare system has been investing in improved PC delivery for women since the early US Government Accounting Office reports that were critical of the VA’s lack of gender-specific services, gaps in care, and privacy/safety concerns.12 , 13 Landmark legislation followed (PL102-585) (1992), which led to the establishment of eight Comprehensive Women’s Health (WH) Centers by 1994. Designed to provide “one-stop shopping” through interdisciplinary teams in same-gender environments, these centers were quickly overwhelmed with demand.14 , 15 The VA concurrently mandated creation of WH Clinics or Women’s PC teams (e.g., designated WH provider/team in general PC) for the rest of the VA, consistent with model programs in the community.16 – 18 These changes occurred in parallel with PC delivery improvements integral to the VA’s quality transformation of the mid to late 1990s.19 , 20
Women’s clinic prevalence subsequently expanded eight-fold, improving access to gender-specific services, while the volume of women seen in the VA doubled over the decade.10 , 21 Recruitment of WH clinicians and reliance on academic trainees/fellows were deciding factors in building these programs.22 , 23 However, the range of WH services available on site actually declined through 2007, as four in ten of the new women’s clinics focused chiefly on gender-specific exams.24 The new clinics were also less consistently able to offer same-gender providers or adequate privacy compared to the original comprehensive centers.24 Women’s clinics offering more comprehensive services enjoyed better women’s ratings of care and higher quality, as did integrated general PC clinics that included experienced WH providers and made gender-specific care available.11 , 25 – 28
VA Policy on Gender-Sensitive Comprehensive Primary Care for Women
Recognition of women’s special needs led to VA policy action requiring system-wide achievement of patient-centered comprehensive PC for women.29 Launched alongside PACT in 2010, the policy established standards for what constitutes “complete PC” in either separate comprehensive women’s clinics or gender-integrated PC clinics, with one or more designated WH providers and explicit attention to gender sensitivity (Table 1). Compliance also requires co-location of mental health care, co-location or efficient referral to specialty gynecology services, use of state-of-the-art equipment and technology, and ready access to female chaperones for gender-specific exams.
PACT and Women Veterans’ Health
The PACT model itself does not include specific accommodations for gender-specific care or improved gender sensitivity. Medical home evaluations outside the VA typically fail to report outcomes by gender, providing a limited evidence base to support potentially useful adaptations other than those that may improve provision of gender-specific services.30 , 31 VA policy nonetheless establishes expectations that VA PC and women’s clinics will develop comparable team-based staffing, meet the same standards for access and continuity, and be equally accountable for all prevention and chronic disease performance measures and expansion of telephone care and secure messaging.
Despite policy alignment, challenges remain (Table 1). For example, access to PACT resources in individual women’s clinics varies, as does availability of designated WH providers, female chaperones and privacy arrangements in integrated models. Greater reliance on community providers for women’s services increases care coordination demands on PACT teams. Women veterans also tend to bypass community-based practices to get to women’s clinics at larger VA medical centers,32 which may meet their preferences but adversely affect PACT continuity measures.
CONCLUSION
There is growing awareness of the complexity and constraints of effectively and efficiently delivering PC to women veterans in a healthcare system where they represent a characteristically low volume of patients. An underlying tension remains unresolved on how best to achieve PACT goals for women in a system that has been described as a “patchwork quilt with gaps.”33 , 34 Some evidence suggests that the VA may have one visit to “make or break” women’s decisions to use VA care, especially under the promise of broader healthcare options under the Affordable Care Act.35
Careful attention must be paid to the differences in how women access and use PC, the mix of their healthcare needs, and the proficiencies that PC teams must acquire and sustain. PACT outcomes should be reported by gender to identify intervention opportunities for reducing gender disparities in care.36 Gender-sensitive measures of women veterans’ experiences with PACT care should also be used to tailor PC to meet their needs.37 , 38 Research-clinical partnerships may also help accelerate testing of innovative approaches to delivering the fundamental tenets of PACT to special populations, bringing evidence-based approaches to bear on these issues.39 – 41 Key lessons may yield insights for ensuring that all veterans equitably benefit from the promise of PACT.
References
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83:457–502.
Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1493–1498.
Rosland A, Nelson K, Sun H, Dolan ED, Maynard C, Bryson C, Stark R, Shear JM, Kerr E, Fihn SD, Schectman G. The patient-centered medical home in the Veterans Health Administration. Am J Manage Care. 2013;19(7):e263–e277.
Vogt DS, Stone ER, Salgado DM, King LA, King DW, Savarese VW. Gender awareness among Veterans Administration health-care workers: existing strengths and areas for improvement. Women Health. 2001;34(4):65–83.
Murdoch M, Bradley A, Mather S, Klein R, Turner C, Yano EM. Women and war: what physicians should know. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 3):S5–S10.
Magruder KM, Frueh BC, Knapp RG, et al. PTSD symptoms, demographic characteristics, and functional status among veterans treated in VA primary care clinics. J Trauma Stress. 2004;17(4):293–301.
Suffoletta-Maierle S, Grubaugh AL, Magruder K, Monnier J, Frueh BC. Trauma-related mental health needs and service utilization among female veterans. J Psychiatr Pract. 2003;9(5):367–75.
Murdoch M, Polusny MA, Hodges J, O'Brien N. Prevalence of in-service and post-service sexual assault among combat and noncombat veterans applying for VA PTSD disability benefits. Mil Med. 2004;169(5):392–5.
Veterans Health Administration. Report to the Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in response to House Appropriations Report No. 110–186, accompanying P.L. 110–161, The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (also called the “VA Hospital Report Card”).
Veterans Health Administration. Sourcebook: Women veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Volume 1: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Use of VHA Care. Washington DC, December 2010.
Yano EM, Rose D, Bean-Mayberry B, Canelo I, Washington DL. Impact of Practice Structure on the Quality of Care for Women Veterans Final Report. Sepulveda, CA: VA HSR&D Center of Excellence for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior; 2010.
U.S. General Accounting Office. Actions needed to ensure that female veterans have equal access to VA benefits. Washington DC, Pub. No. GAO/HRD-82-98, 1982.
U.S. General Accounting Office. VA health care for women: Despite progress, improvements needed. Washington DC, Pub. No. GAO/HRD-92-93, 1992.
U.S. General Accounting Office. VA health care for women, progress made in providing services to women veterans. Washington DC, Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-99-38, 1999.
Weiss TW, Wray NP, Mansyur C. Interim Report: Women Veterans Health Program Evaluation. Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, VA HSR&D Field Program. Management Decision & Research Center (MDRC), November 15, 1995.
Yano EM, Washington DL, Goldzweig C, Caffrey C, Turner CL. The organization and delivery of women’s health care in Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Womens Health Issues. 2003;13:55–61.
Telford BR, Stichler J, Ivie SD, Schaps MJ, Jellen BC. Model approaches to women’s health centers. Womens Health Issues. 1993;3(2):55–62.
Weisman CS, Curbow B, Khoury AJ. The National Survey of Women’s Health Centers: current models of women-centered care. Womens Health Issues. 1995;5(3):103–117.
Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs health care system on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2218–2227.
Yano EM, Simon B, Lanto AB, Rubenstein LV. The evolution of changes in primary care delivery underlying the VHA’s quality transformation. Am J Pub Health. 2007;97(12):2151–2159.
Yano EM, Goldzweig C, Canelo I, Washington DL. Diffusion of innovation in women’s health care delivery: VA adoption of women’s health clinics. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(5):226–235.
Bean-Mayberry B, Caffrey C, Washington DL, Simon B, Yano EM. Organizational characteristics associated with the availability of women’s health clinics for primary care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Mil Med. 2007;172(8):824–828.
Yano EM, Bean-Mayberry B, Washington DL. Barriers to delivering women’s care in VA healthcare settings (Technical Report, 2009). VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Sepulveda, CA.
Yano EM, Washington DL, Bean-Mayberry B. Impact of Practice Structure on the Quality of Care for Women Veterans (Phase 2) Final Report. Sepulveda, CA: VA HSR&D Center of Excellence for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior; 2012.
Bean-Mayberry BA, Chang CH, McNeil MA, Whittle JC, Hayes PM, Hudson-Scholle S. Patient satisfaction in women’s clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:175–181.
Bean-Mayberry BA, Chang C, McNeil M, Hayes P, Scholle SH. Comprehensive care for women veterans: indicators of dual use of VA and non-VA providers. JAMWA. 2004;59:192–197.
Goldzweig C, Parkerton PH, Washington DL, Lanto AB, Yano EM. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: Influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:265–72.
Bean-Mayberry BA, Chang CH, McNeil MA, Scholle SH. Assuring high quality primary care for women: predictors of success. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(1):22–29.
Veterans Health Administration. Health Care Services for Women Veterans. Handbook 1330.01, Washington DC, May 2010.
Gill JM, Fagan HB, Townsend B, Mainous AG. Impact of providing a medical home to the uninsured: evaluation of a statewide program. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16:515–535.
Beal AC, Doty MM, Hernandez SE, Shea KK, Davis K. Closing the Divide: How Medical Homes Promote Equity in Health Care. Washington DC: The Commonwealth Fund; 2007.
Washington DL, Bean-Mayberry B, Riopelle D, Yano EM. Access to health care for women veterans: delayed health care and unmet need. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(Suppl 2):655–661.
Clancy CM, Massion CT. American women’s health care: a patchwork quilt with gaps. JAMA. 1992;268:1919–1920.
McNeil M, Hayes P. Women’s health care in the VA system: another “patchwork quilt”. Womens Health Issues. 2003;13(2):47–49.
Hamilton AB, Frayne SM, Cordasco KM, Washington DL. Factors related to attrition from VA healthcare use: findings from the National Survey of Women Veterans. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(Suppl 2):S510–S516.
Yano EM, Hayes P, Wright S, Schnurr PP, Lipson L, Bean-Mayberry B, Washington DL. Integration of women veterans into VA quality improvement research efforts: what researchers need to know. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;1:56–61.
Scholle SH, Weisman CS, Anderson RT, Camacho F. The development and validation of the primary care satisfaction survey for women. Womens Health Issues. 2004;14(2):35–50.
Washington DL, Bean-Mayberry B, Mitchell MN, Riopelle D, Yano EM. Tailoring VA primary care to women veterans: association with patient-rated quality and satisfaction. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(4 Suppl):S112–S119.
VA Office of Research and Development. VA Women Veterans’ Health Collaborative Research to Enhance and Advance Transformation and Excellence (CREATE). www.hsrd.research.va.gov/create, accessed April 15, 2013.
Yano EM, Bastian L, Bean-Mayberry B, Eisen S, Frayne SM, Hayes P, Lipson L, Mattocks K, McGlynn G, Sadler AN, Schnurr P, Washington DL. Using research to transform care for women veterans: advancing the research agenda and enhancing research-clinical partnerships. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(4 Suppl):S73–S83.
Bastian LA, Bosworth HB, Washington DL, Yano EM. Setting the stage: research to inform practice, policy and interventions to improve women veterans’ health and health care. Editorial. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(Suppl 2):S491–S494.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Contributors
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Ismelda Canelo, MPA, and Britney Chow, MPH, for support in the literature review and manuscript preparation.
Funders
This article was supported by funding from Women’s Health Services in the VHA Office of Patient Care Services and VA HSR&D Service (Women’s Health CREATE Project no. CRE 12-026 and Project no. IAE 07-170). Dr. Yano’s effort was funded through a VA HSR&D Senior Research Career Scientist Award (project no. 05-195).
Prior Presentations
This work has not been presented at any conferences or meetings.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yano, E.M., Haskell, S. & Hayes, P. Delivery of Gender-Sensitive Comprehensive Primary Care to Women Veterans: Implications for VA Patient Aligned Care Teams. J GEN INTERN MED 29 (Suppl 2), 703–707 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2699-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2699-3