Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase Angle, Frailty and Mortality in Older Adults

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Capsule Commentary to this article was published on 08 October 2013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a multidimensional phenotype that describes declining physical function and a vulnerability to adverse outcomes in the setting of physical stress such as illness or hospitalization. Phase angle is a composite measure of tissue resistance and reactance measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Whether phase angle is associated with frailty and mortality in the general population is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations among phase angle, frailty and mortality.

DESIGN

Population-based survey.

SETTING

Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (1988–1994).

PARTICIPANTS

In all, 4,667 persons aged 60 and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Frailty was defined according to a set of criteria derived from a definition previously described and validated.

RESULTS

Narrow phase angle (the lowest quintile) was associated with a four-fold higher odds of frailty among women and a three-fold higher odds of frailty among men, adjusted for age, sex, race-ethnicity and comorbidity. Over a 12-year follow-up period, the adjusted relative hazard for mortality associated with narrow phase angle was 2.4 (95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 1.8 to 3.1) in women and 2.2 (95 % CI 1.7 to 2.9) in men. Narrow phase angle was significantly associated with mortality even among participants with little or no comorbidity.

LIMITATIONS

Analyses of BIA and frailty were cross-sectional; BIA was not measured serially and incident frailty during follow-up was not assessed. Participants examined at home were excluded from analysis because they did not undergo BIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Narrow phase angle is associated with frailty and mortality independent of age and comorbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Jones DM, Song X, Rockwood K. Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(11):1929–1933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morley JE, Haren MT, Rolland Y, Kim MJ. Frailty. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90(5):837–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slaets JP. Vulnerability in the elderly: frailty. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90(4):593–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoogerduijn JG, Schuurmans MJ, Duijnstee MS, de Rooij SE, Grypdonck MF. A systematic review of predictors and screening instruments to identify older hospitalized patients at risk for functional decline. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(1):46–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morley JE. Diabetes, sarcopenia, and frailty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2008;24(3):455–469. vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchholz AC, Bartok C, Schoeller DA. The validity of bioelectrical impedance models in clinical populations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2004;19(5):433–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Selberg O, Selberg D. Norms and correlates of bioimpedance phase angle in healthy human subjects, hospitalized patients, and patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;86(6):509–516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nyboer J, Kreider MM, Hannapel L. Quantitative studies of electrical conductivity of the peripheral body segments; basic and practical considerations. Ann West Med Surg. 1951;5(1):11–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bellizzi V, Scalfi L, Terracciano V, Marra M, Di Iorio B. The prediction of single-frequency BIA variables from individual characteristics. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40(Suppl 1):S233–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dittmar M. Reliability and variability of bioimpedance measures in normal adults: effects of age, gender, and body mass. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;122(4):361–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. VanderJagt DJ, Trujillo MR, Bode-Thomas F, Huang YS, Chuang LT, Glew RH. Phase angle correlates with n-3 fatty acids and cholesterol in red cells of Nigerian children with sickle cell disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2003;2:2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chertow GM, Jacobs DO, Lazarus JM, Lew NL, Lowrie EG. Phase Angle Predicts Survival in Hemodialysis Patients. J Renal Nutrition. 1997;7(4):204–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Burrows JL, et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(6):1634–1638.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta D, Lis CG, Dahlk SL, Vashi PG, Grutsch JF, Lammersfeld CA. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Nutr. 2004;92(6):957–962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maggiore Q, Nigrelli S, Ciccarelli C, Grimaldi C, Rossi GA, Michelassi C. Nutritional and prognostic correlates of bioimpedance indexes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1996;50(6):2103–2108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ott M, Fischer H, Polat H, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a predictor of survival in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1995;9(1):20–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mushnick R, Fein PA, Mittman N, Goel N, Chattopadhyay J, Avram MM. Relationship of bioelectrical impedance parameters to nutrition and survival in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 2003;87:S53–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994;(32):1–407.

  20. National Center for Health Statistics. Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) Linked Mortality File, Mortality Follow-up Through 2006: Matching Methodology. May 2009. Hyattsville, Maryland.

  21. Rule AD, Gussak HM, Pond GR, et al. Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(1):112–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ, Cosio FG. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(12):929–937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilhelm-Leen ER, Hall YN, K Tamura M, Chertow GM. Frailty and chronic kidney disease: the Third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey. Am J Med. 2009;122(7)):664–671. e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reference Manual: Physician Examiner’s Training Manual. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics;1991. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/nchs/manuals/phys.pdf

  25. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–2572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Introduction to Survey Sampling and Analysis Procedures. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2002–2008.

  27. Chertow GM, Lazarus JM, Lew NL, Ma L, Lowrie EG. Bioimpedance norms for the hemodialysis population. Kidney Int. 1997;52(6):1617–1621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chertow GM, Lowrie EG, Wilmore DW, et al. Nutritional assessment with bioelectrical impedance analysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6(1):75–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Toso S, Piccoli A, Gusella M, et al. Altered tissue electric properties in lung cancer patients as detected by bioelectric impedance vector analysis. Nutrition. 2000;16(2):120–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johansen KL, Kaysen GA, Young BS, Hung AM, da Silva M, Chertow GM. Longitudinal study of nutritional status, body composition, and physical function in hemodialysis patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(4):842–846.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fein PA, Gundumalla G, Jorden A, Matza B, Chattopadhyay J, Avram MM. Usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis in monitoring nutrition status and survival of peritoneal dialysis patients. Adv Perit Dial. 2002;18:195–199.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for Dr. Wilhelm-Leen was provided by a Medical Scholars grant from the Stanford University School of Medicine. Dr. Chertow was supported by K24 DK085446.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilee R. Wilhelm-Leen MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilhelm-Leen, E.R., Hall, Y.N., Horwitz, R.I. et al. Phase Angle, Frailty and Mortality in Older Adults. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 147–154 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2585-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2585-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation