Skip to main content
Log in

Standardized Patient-Narrated Web-Based Learning Modules Improve Students’ Communication Skills on a High-stakes Clinical Skills Examination

  • Innovation and Improvement: Innovations in Medical Education
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of web-based standardized patient (SP) modules is associated with improved medical student history-taking and physical examination skills on clinical performance examinations (CPX), but a benefit for communication skills has not been shown.

AIM

We describe an innovative web-based SP module using detailed SP and faculty commentary to teach communication skills.

SETTING

A public medical school in 2008–2009.

PARTICIPANTS

Fourth-year medical students.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

A 90-minute web-based module with three simulated clinical encounters was narrated by an expert clinician and SP to explain expected history-taking, physical examination, and communication skills behaviors. All 147 students were encouraged to review the module one month before the CPX.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

One hundred and six students (72%) viewed the web-based module. Students who watched the module performed significantly higher on the CPX communication score (+2.67%, p < 0.01) and overall score (+2.12%, p = 0.03), even after controlling for USMLE Step 1 and clerkship summary ratings. Use of the module did not significantly affect history/physical examination scores (+1.89%, p = 0.12).

DISCUSSION

Students who watched an optional web-based SP module prior to the CPX performed higher than those who did not on communication skills. The web-based module appears to be an effective CPX preparatory activity to enhance communication performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152(9):1423–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17(4):351–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalet A, Pugnaire MP, Cole-Kelly K, Janicik R, Ferrara E, Schwartz MD, et al. Teaching communication in clinical clerkships: models from the Macy initiative in health communications. Acad Med. 2004;79(6):511–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Makoul G. Communication skills education in medical school and beyond. JAMA. 2003;289(1):93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. May W, Park JH, Lee JP. A ten-year review of the literature on the use of standardized patients in teaching and learning: 1996–2005. Med Teach. 2009;31(6):487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorin S, Rho L, Wisnivesky JP, Nierman DM. Improving medical student intensive care unit communication skills: a novel educational initiative using standardized family members. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9):2386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levenkron JC, Greenland P, Bowley N. Using patient instructors to teach behavioral counseling skills. J Med Educ. 1987;62(8):665–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen J, Spatz ES, Gaaserud AM, Abramovitch H, Weinreb B, Wenger NS, et al. A new approach to developing cross-cultural communication skills. Med Teach. 2004;26(2):126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vannatta JB, Smith KR, Crandall S, Fischer PC, Williams K. Comparison of standardized patients and faculty in teaching medical interviewing. Acad Med. 1996;71(12):1360–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hauer KE, Hodgson CS, Kerr KM, Teherani A, Irby DM. A national study of medical student clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S25–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hauer KE, Chou CL, Souza KH, Henry D, Loeser H, Burke C, et al. Impact of an in-person versus web-based practice standardized patient examination on student performance on a subsequent high-stakes standardized patient examination. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21:284–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Broekkamp H, Van Hout-Wolters, Bernadette HAM. Students’ adaptation of study strategies when preparing for classroom tests. Educ Psychol Rev. 2007;19(4):401–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yudkowsky R, Downing SM, Ommert D. Prior experiences associated with residents' scores on a communication and interpersonal skill OSCE. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62(3):368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shirar LE, Vu NV, Colliver JA, Barrows HS. A survey of study methods, preparation time, test-taking strategies, and perceptions of test validity on a clinical performance-based examination. Acad Med. 1992;67(10 Suppl):S10–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGaghie WC, Downing SM, Kubilius R. What is the impact of commercial test preparation courses on medical examination performance? Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):202–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang C, Rauchwarger A, Toth C, O'Connell M. Student USMLE step 1 preparation and performance. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(4):291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pilotti M, Chodorow M, Petrov R. The usefulness of retrieval practice and review-only practice for answering conceptually related test questions. J Gen Psychol. 2009;136(2):179–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010;85(5):909–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heine N, Garman K, Wallace P, Bartos R, Richards A. An analysis of standardised patient checklist errors and their effect on student scores. Med Educ. 2003;37(2):99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guiton G, Hodgson CS, Delandshere G, Wilkerson L. Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: a psychometric study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(3):179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee WD, Hanley JA, Norcini J, Girard N, et al. Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(23):3019–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lang F, McCord R, Harvill L, Anderson DS. Communication assessment using the common ground instrument: psychometric properties. Fam Med. 2004;36(3):189–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Srinivasan M, Hauer KE, Der-Martirosian C, Wilkes M, Gesundheit N. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Med Educ. 2007;41(9):857–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin D, Regehr G, Hodges B, McNaughton. Using videotaped benchmarks to improve the self-assessment ability of family practice residents. Acad Med. 1998;73(11):1201–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Werner LS, Bull BS. The effect of three commercial coaching courses on step one USMLE performance. Med Educ. 2003;37(6):527–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kachur E, Schwartz MD, Ockene J, Chepaitis AE, et al. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1157–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rifkin WD, Rifkin A. Correlation between housestaff performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination and standardized patient encounters. Mt Sinai J Med. 2005;72(1):47–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Simon SR, Volkan K, Hamann C, Duffey C, Fletcher SW. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE step 1 scores. Med Teach. 2002;24(5):535–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mann KV. Motivation in medical education: how theory can inform our practice. Acad Med. 1999;74(3):237–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests? Med Educ. 2004;38(9):950–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilkinson TJ, Wells JE, Bushnell JA. Medical student characteristics associated with time in study: is spending more time always a good thing? Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):106–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Bernie Miller and Jewel Smally for assistance with module creation and examination administration and Christian Burke for technical assistance. This study was supported by a University of California, San Francisco Academy of Medical Educators Innovations Grant.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina A. Lee MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, C.A., Chang, A., Chou, C.L. et al. Standardized Patient-Narrated Web-Based Learning Modules Improve Students’ Communication Skills on a High-stakes Clinical Skills Examination. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 1374–1377 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1809-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1809-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation