Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dual Medicare and Veteran Health Administration Use and Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalizations

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to examine the association between ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations (ACSH) and dual Medicare/Veteran Health Administration use.

PARTICIPANTS

A nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).

DESIGN/MEASUREMENTS

Cross-sectional analyses (N = 44,988) of linked fee-for-service Medicare claims and survey data from multiple years of the MCBS (2001–2005). Any ACSH and specific types of ACSH were measured using the list of prevention quality indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Among veterans, dual Medicare/VHA use was defined as having inpatient or outpatient visits paid by VHA and consisted of three categories: 1) predominant-VHA use; 2) some VHA use and no VHA use. Unadjusted group differences in any ACSH were tested using chi-square tests. Logistic regressions were used to analyze the association between dual Medicare/VHA use and ACSH after controlling for demographic, socio-economic status, health status, functional status, smoking status and obesity. All analyses accounted for the complex design of the MCBS.

RESULTS

Among inpatient users, 10.1% had ACSH events for acute conditions and 15.8% for chronic conditions. Among all survey respondents, 5% had any ACSH event. Among predominant-VHA users the rate was 4.9% and among veterans with some VHA use it was 3.7%. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, dual Medicare/VHA use was not significantly associated with any ACSH.

CONCLUSION

In a representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, despite low income and health status, veterans with dual Medicare/VHA use were as likely as veterans without dual use to have any ACSH, perhaps due to expanded healthcare access and emphasis on primary care in the VHA system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berwick DM. Launching accountable care organizations–the proposed rule for the Medicare shared savings program. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):e32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services. National healthcare quality report, 2010. 2011. Report No.: 11–0004.

  3. Kruzikas DT, Jiang HJ, Remus D, Barrett ML, Coffey RM, Andrews R. Preventable hospitalizations: A window into primary and PreventiveCare, 2000. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.

  4. Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Komaromy M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, et al. Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA. 1995;274(4):305–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eun SJ, Hong J, Lee JY, Lee J, Kim Y, Kim Y, et al. [Differences in medical care utilization rates of the disabled and the non-disabled with ambulatory care sensitive conditions]. J Prev Med Public Health. 2006;39(5):411–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez A, Luis S, Blasco S, Sempere L, Iranzo JM, Zaragoza R, et al. In: Cost-benefit analysis of an intervention program in avoidable hospitalizations. ; 2007.

  7. Thorpe JM, Van Houtven CH, Sleath BL, Thorpe CT. Rural-urban differences in preventable hospitalizations among community-dwelling veterans with dementia. J Rural Health. 2010;26(2):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bass E, Pracht E. The declining rate of avoidable hospitalizations in the Veterans Health Administration. J Healthc Qual. 2006;28(4):45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Finegan MS, Gao J, Pasquale D, Campbell J. Trends and geographic variation of potentially avoidable hospitalizations in the veterans health-care system. Health Serv Manage Res. 2010;23(2):66–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prentice J, Pizer S. Waiting times and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology. 2008;8(1):1387–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. West AN, Weeks WB. Health care expenditures for urban and rural veterans in Veterans Health Administration care. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(5):1718–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hynes DM, Koelling K, Stroupe K, Arnold N, Mallin K, Sohn M, et al. Veterans’ access to and use of Medicare and veterans affairs health care. Med Care. 2007;45(3):214–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hester EJ, Cook DJ, Robbins LJ. The VA and Medicare HMOs--complementary or redundant? N Engl J Med. 2005;353(12):1302–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Helmer D, Sambamoorthi U, Shen Y, Tseng C, Rajan M, Tiwari A, et al. Opting out of an integrated healthcare system: Dual-system use is associated with poorer glycemic control in veterans with diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2008;2(2):73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolinsky FD, Miller TR, An H, Brezinski PR, Vaughn TE, Rosenthal GE. Dual use of Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration: Are there adverse health outcomes? BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jia H, Zheng Y, Reker DM, Cowper DC, Wu SS, Vogel WB, et al. Multiple system utilization and mortality for veterans with stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(2):355–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Center for Medicare & Medicaid services, limited datasets [Internet].; 2009. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/LimitedDataSets/11_MCBS.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed June 16, 2011

  18. Keyhani S, Ross JS, Hebert P, Dellenbaugh C, Penrod JD, Siu AL. Use of preventive care by elderly male veterans receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration, Medicare fee-for-service, and Medicare HMO plans. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Department of Health & Human Services. AHRQ prevention quality indicators. 2008. Report No.: 3.2.

  20. Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280(19):1690–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroupe KT, Hynes DM, Giobbie-Hurder A, Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, Reda DJ, et al. Patient satisfaction and use of veterans affairs versus non-veterans affairs healthcare services by veterans. Med Care. 2005;43(5):453–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. StataCorp. Stata statistical software. . 2009;Release 11.

  23. Statistical brief #99; healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) [Internet].; 2009. Available from: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb99.jsp. Accessed June 16, 2011

  24. Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(1):30–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Department of Health and Human Services. Congestive heart failure in the united states: A new epidemic. 1996.

  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pneumonia fast facts. 2010.

  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2008. Report No.: 57.

  28. File Thomas M, Marrie TJ Jr. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgrad Med. 2010;122(2):130–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dalal AA, Shah M, D’Souza AO, Rane P. Costs of COPD exacerbations in the emergency department and inpatient setting. Respir Med. 2011;105(3):454–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Axon RN, Williams MV. Hospital readmission as an accountability measure. JAMA. 2011;305(5):504–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(22):2218–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eppig FJ, Chulis GS. Matching MCBS (Medicare current beneficiary survey) and Medicare data: The best of both worlds. Spring. 1997;18(3):211–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jonk Y, O’Connor H, Schult T, Cutting A, Feldman R, Ripley DC, et al. Using the Medicare current beneficiary survey to conduct research on Medicare-eligible veterans. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(8):797–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Dr. Sambamoorthi was partially supported by infrastructure from the Collaborative Health Outcomes Research of Therapies and Services (CoHORTS) Grant (1 P20 HS 015390–02. The authors would like to thank Dr. Patricia Findley for providing access to the MCBS data and appreciate research assistant support provided by Mr. Sandipan Bhattacharjee and Ms. Amruta Manke. The findings and opinions reported are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any other individuals or organizations.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayank Ajmera BPharm, MS.

Additional information

The opinions expressed in this article are of the authors and do not reflect the views/opinions of any organization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ajmera, M., Wilkins, T.L. & Sambamoorthi, U. Dual Medicare and Veteran Health Administration Use and Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalizations. J GEN INTERN MED 26 (Suppl 2), 669 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1788-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1788-4

KEY WORDS

Navigation