ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study is to examine the association between ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations (ACSH) and dual Medicare/Veteran Health Administration use.
PARTICIPANTS
A nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).
DESIGN/MEASUREMENTS
Cross-sectional analyses (N = 44,988) of linked fee-for-service Medicare claims and survey data from multiple years of the MCBS (2001–2005). Any ACSH and specific types of ACSH were measured using the list of prevention quality indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Among veterans, dual Medicare/VHA use was defined as having inpatient or outpatient visits paid by VHA and consisted of three categories: 1) predominant-VHA use; 2) some VHA use and no VHA use. Unadjusted group differences in any ACSH were tested using chi-square tests. Logistic regressions were used to analyze the association between dual Medicare/VHA use and ACSH after controlling for demographic, socio-economic status, health status, functional status, smoking status and obesity. All analyses accounted for the complex design of the MCBS.
RESULTS
Among inpatient users, 10.1% had ACSH events for acute conditions and 15.8% for chronic conditions. Among all survey respondents, 5% had any ACSH event. Among predominant-VHA users the rate was 4.9% and among veterans with some VHA use it was 3.7%. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, dual Medicare/VHA use was not significantly associated with any ACSH.
CONCLUSION
In a representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, despite low income and health status, veterans with dual Medicare/VHA use were as likely as veterans without dual use to have any ACSH, perhaps due to expanded healthcare access and emphasis on primary care in the VHA system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berwick DM. Launching accountable care organizations–the proposed rule for the Medicare shared savings program. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):e32.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services. National healthcare quality report, 2010. 2011. Report No.: 11–0004.
Kruzikas DT, Jiang HJ, Remus D, Barrett ML, Coffey RM, Andrews R. Preventable hospitalizations: A window into primary and PreventiveCare, 2000. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.
Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Komaromy M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, et al. Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA. 1995;274(4):305–11.
Eun SJ, Hong J, Lee JY, Lee J, Kim Y, Kim Y, et al. [Differences in medical care utilization rates of the disabled and the non-disabled with ambulatory care sensitive conditions]. J Prev Med Public Health. 2006;39(5):411–8.
Sanchez A, Luis S, Blasco S, Sempere L, Iranzo JM, Zaragoza R, et al. In: Cost-benefit analysis of an intervention program in avoidable hospitalizations. ; 2007.
Thorpe JM, Van Houtven CH, Sleath BL, Thorpe CT. Rural-urban differences in preventable hospitalizations among community-dwelling veterans with dementia. J Rural Health. 2010;26(2):146–55.
Bass E, Pracht E. The declining rate of avoidable hospitalizations in the Veterans Health Administration. J Healthc Qual. 2006;28(4):45.
Finegan MS, Gao J, Pasquale D, Campbell J. Trends and geographic variation of potentially avoidable hospitalizations in the veterans health-care system. Health Serv Manage Res. 2010;23(2):66–75.
Prentice J, Pizer S. Waiting times and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology. 2008;8(1):1387–41.
West AN, Weeks WB. Health care expenditures for urban and rural veterans in Veterans Health Administration care. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(5):1718–34.
Hynes DM, Koelling K, Stroupe K, Arnold N, Mallin K, Sohn M, et al. Veterans’ access to and use of Medicare and veterans affairs health care. Med Care. 2007;45(3):214–23.
Hester EJ, Cook DJ, Robbins LJ. The VA and Medicare HMOs--complementary or redundant? N Engl J Med. 2005;353(12):1302–3.
Helmer D, Sambamoorthi U, Shen Y, Tseng C, Rajan M, Tiwari A, et al. Opting out of an integrated healthcare system: Dual-system use is associated with poorer glycemic control in veterans with diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2008;2(2):73–80.
Wolinsky FD, Miller TR, An H, Brezinski PR, Vaughn TE, Rosenthal GE. Dual use of Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration: Are there adverse health outcomes? BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:131.
Jia H, Zheng Y, Reker DM, Cowper DC, Wu SS, Vogel WB, et al. Multiple system utilization and mortality for veterans with stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(2):355–60.
Center for Medicare & Medicaid services, limited datasets [Internet].; 2009. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/LimitedDataSets/11_MCBS.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed June 16, 2011
Keyhani S, Ross JS, Hebert P, Dellenbaugh C, Penrod JD, Siu AL. Use of preventive care by elderly male veterans receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration, Medicare fee-for-service, and Medicare HMO plans. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2179–85.
Department of Health & Human Services. AHRQ prevention quality indicators. 2008. Report No.: 3.2.
Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280(19):1690–1.
Stroupe KT, Hynes DM, Giobbie-Hurder A, Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, Reda DJ, et al. Patient satisfaction and use of veterans affairs versus non-veterans affairs healthcare services by veterans. Med Care. 2005;43(5):453–60.
StataCorp. Stata statistical software. . 2009;Release 11.
Statistical brief #99; healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) [Internet].; 2009. Available from: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb99.jsp. Accessed June 16, 2011
Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(1):30–41.
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Department of Health and Human Services. Congestive heart failure in the united states: A new epidemic. 1996.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pneumonia fast facts. 2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2008. Report No.: 57.
File Thomas M, Marrie TJ Jr. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgrad Med. 2010;122(2):130–41.
Dalal AA, Shah M, D’Souza AO, Rane P. Costs of COPD exacerbations in the emergency department and inpatient setting. Respir Med. 2011;105(3):454–60.
Axon RN, Williams MV. Hospital readmission as an accountability measure. JAMA. 2011;305(5):504–5.
Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(22):2218–27.
Eppig FJ, Chulis GS. Matching MCBS (Medicare current beneficiary survey) and Medicare data: The best of both worlds. Spring. 1997;18(3):211–29.
Jonk Y, O’Connor H, Schult T, Cutting A, Feldman R, Ripley DC, et al. Using the Medicare current beneficiary survey to conduct research on Medicare-eligible veterans. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(8):797–813.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Sambamoorthi was partially supported by infrastructure from the Collaborative Health Outcomes Research of Therapies and Services (CoHORTS) Grant (1 P20 HS 015390–02. The authors would like to thank Dr. Patricia Findley for providing access to the MCBS data and appreciate research assistant support provided by Mr. Sandipan Bhattacharjee and Ms. Amruta Manke. The findings and opinions reported are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any other individuals or organizations.
Conflict of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The opinions expressed in this article are of the authors and do not reflect the views/opinions of any organization.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ajmera, M., Wilkins, T.L. & Sambamoorthi, U. Dual Medicare and Veteran Health Administration Use and Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalizations. J GEN INTERN MED 26 (Suppl 2), 669 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1788-4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1788-4