Skip to main content
Log in

The Quality of Colonoscopy Services—Responsibilities of Referring Clinicians

A Consensus Statement of the Quality Assurance Task Group, National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary care clinicians initiate and oversee colorectal screening for their patients, but colonoscopy, a central component of screening programs, is usually performed by consultants. The accuracy and safety of colonoscopy varies among endoscopists, even those with mainstream training and certification. Therefore, it is a primary care responsibility to choose the best available colonoscopy services. A working group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable identified a set of indicators that primary care clinicians can use to assess the quality of colonoscopy services. Quality measures are of actual performance, not training, specialty, or experience alone. The main elements of quality are a complete report, technical competence, and a safe setting for the procedure. We provide explicit criteria that primary care physicians can use when choosing a colonoscopist. Information on quality indicators will be increasingly available with quality improvement efforts within the colonoscopy community and growth in the use of electronic medical records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith SA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–37.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher RH. Successful colorectal cancer screening starts with primary care. Reviews in Gastroenterological Disorders. 2002;2(Suppl 1):S27–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/policy/policies/c/colonoscopyprivileging.html (Accessed June, 2010)

  5. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotton PB, Connor P, McGee D, Jowell P, Nickl N, Schutz S, et al. Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastorintestinal Endoscopy. 2003;57(3):352–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Burt LTR, DA RW J, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy in the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(6):1294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith R, Atkin W, Duggirala SB, Fletcher RH, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system (CO-RADS): Report of the Quality Assurance Task Force Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2007;65(6):757–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. http://www.nccrt.org (Accessed June, 2010)

  10. Winawer S, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O’Brien MJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mysliweic PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are clinicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(4):264–71.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zauber A, Winawer SJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, O’Brien MJ. Effect of initial polypectomy versus surveillance polypectomy on colorectal cancer mortality reduction: micro-simulation modeling of the national Polyp Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:S558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(3):162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(23):1781–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A, Dobhan R, Eastone J, Coyle W, et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2061–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Regula J, Rupinsky M, Kraszewska E, Polkowsky M, Pachlewski J, Orlowska J, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1863–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, Greenwald BD, Raufman J-P. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: An analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:721–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Niv Y, Hazazi R, Levi Z, Fraser G. Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic people: A meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(12):3049–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. NHS Bowel Screening Programme. Accreditation of Screening Colonoscopists. BCSP Implementation Guide No. 3, Version 3, 18 May 2007.

  20. Bowles CJA, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut. 2004;53:277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ball JE, Osborne J, Jowett S, Pellen M, Welfare MR. Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study. BMJ. 2004;329:665–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopy miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(1):24–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40(4):284–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and risk of interval cancers. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1795–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. American Gastroenterological Association. The American Gastroenterological Association standards for gastrointestinal endoscopy services. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:440–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma VK, Coppola AG, Raufman JP. A survey of credentialing practices of gastrointestinal endoscopy centers in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(6):501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee TH, Bodenheimer T, Goroll AH, Starfield B, Treadway K. Perspective roundtable: redesigning primary care. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(20):e24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilkins T, LeCLair B, Smolkin M, Davies K, Thomas A, Taylor ML, et al. Screening colonoscopies by primary care clinicians: A meta-analysis. Ann Family Med. 2009;7(1):56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Cancer Society and the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Dominitz was supported by an American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Career Development Award.

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has a financial tie to entities that would stand to gain financially from implementation of the recommendations in this statement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Fletcher MD, MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, R.H., Nadel, M.R., Allen, J.I. et al. The Quality of Colonoscopy Services—Responsibilities of Referring Clinicians. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 1230–1234 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1446-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1446-2

KEY WORDS

Navigation