Abstract
Background
Internal Medicine residency training in ambulatory care has been judged inadequate, yet how trainees value continuity clinic and which aspects of clinic affect attitudes are unknown.
Objectives
To determine the value that Internal Medicine residents place on continuity clinic and how clinic precepting, operations, and patient panels affect its valuation.
Design and measurements
A survey on ambulatory care was developed, including questions on career choice and the value of clinical training experiences. Independent variables were Likert-scale ratings (1 = disagree strongly/no value; 3 = neutral; 5 = agree strongly/high value) on preceptors, patients, operations, and resident characteristics. Odds ratios and stepwise multivariate logistic regression with clustering were used to evaluate associations between clinic valuation and independent variables.
Subjects
Internal medicine residents at 3 residency programs.
Results
218 of 260 residents (83.8%) completed the survey. Resident ratings were highest on diversity of illness seen (4.1), medical record systems used (4.1), and contact with preceptors who were receptive to questions (4.8). Resident ratings were lowest on economic diversity of patients (2.7), interruptions from inpatient wards (3.1), and contact with preceptors who taught history and physical exam skills (3.5). High ratings on all precepting issues and nearly all operational issues were associated with valuing clinic. With multivariate analysis, high ratings of preceptors as role models were most strongly associated with valuing clinic (corrected relative risk 3.44). A planned career in general Internal Medicine was not associated with valuing clinic.
Conclusions
Satisfaction with preceptors, particularly as role models, and clinic operations correlate with the value residents place on continuity clinic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fitzgibbons JP, Bordley DR, Berkowitz LR, Miller BW, Henderson MC. Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: a position paper from the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:920–6.
Weinberger SE, Smith LG, Collier VU. Redesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:927–32.
Swing SR, Vasilias J. Internal medicine residency in ambulatory settings. Acad Med. 1997;72:988–96.
Bordage G, Burack JH, Irby DM, Stritter FT. Education in ambulatory settings: developing valid measures of educational outcomes, and other research priorities. Acad Med. 1998;73:743–50.
Bowen JL, Irby DM. Assessing quality and costs of education in the ambulatory setting: a review of the literature. Acad Med. 2002;77:621–80.
Whitcomb ME. Ambulatory care education: what we know and what we don’t. Acad Med. 2002;77:591–2.
James P, Shipengrover J. Developing benchmarks to measure instructional quality for ambulatory education. Acad Med. 2001;76(5):571–2.
Bowen JL, Stearns JA, Dohner C, Blackman J, Simpson D. Defining and evaluating quality for ambulatory care educational programs. Acad Med. 1997;72(6):506–10.
Schultz KW, Kirby J, Delva D, Godwin M, Verma S, Birtwhistle R, Knapper C, Seguin R. Medical students’ and residents’ preferred site characteristics and preceptor behaviours for learning in the ambulatory setting: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:12.
Serwint JR, Feigelman S, Dumont-Driscoll M, Collins R, Zhan M, Kittredge D. Factors associated with resident satisfaction with their continuity experience. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4:4–10.
Randall CS, Bergus GR, Schlechte JA, McGuinness G, Mueller CW. Factors associated with primary care residents’ satisfaction with their training. Fam Med. 1997;29(10):730–5.
Probst JC, Baxley EG, Schell BJ, Cleghorn GD, Bogdewic SP. Organizational environment and perceptions of teaching quality in seven South Carolina family medicine residency programs. Acad Med. 1998;73(8):887–93.
McGee SR, Irby DM. Teaching in the outpatient clinic: practical tips. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(S2):S34–40.
Barnett DR, Bass PF, Griffith CH, Caudill TS, Wilson JF. Determinants of resident satisfaction with patients in their continuity clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:456–9.
Schultz KW, Kirby J, Delva D, Godwin M, Verma S, Birtwhistle R, Knapper C, Seguin R. Medical students’ and residents’ preferred site characteristics and preceptor behaviors for learning in the ambulatory setting: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:12.
Sisson SD, Hughes MT, Levine D, Brancati FL. Effect of an Internet-based curriculum on post-graduate education: a multicenter intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:503–7.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000
Zhang J, Yu KF. What is the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.
Wolverton SE, Bosworth MF. A survey of resident perceptions of effective teaching behaviors. Fam Med. 1985;17:106–8.
Gjerde CL, Coble RJ. Resident and faculty perceptions of effective clinical teaching in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1982;14:323–7.
Stritter FT, Baker RM. Resident preferences for the clinical teaching of ambulatory care. J Med Educ. 1982;57:33–41.
Probst JC, Baxley EG, Schell BJ, Cleghorn GD, Bogdewic SP. Organizational environment and perceptions of teaching quality in seven South Carolina family medicine residency programs. Acad Med. 1998;73:887–93.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Sisson receives an annual stipend for editing the curriculum contained on the web site described herein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sisson, S.D., Boonyasai, R., Baker-Genaw, K. et al. Continuity Clinic Satisfaction and Valuation in Residency Training. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 1704–1710 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0412-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0412-0