Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers to Obtaining Waivers to Prescribe Buprenorphine for Opioid Addiction Treatment Among HIV Physicians

  • Populations at Risk
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Illicit drug use is common among HIV-infected individuals. Buprenorphine enables physicians to simultaneously treat HIV and opioid dependence, offering opportunities to improve health outcomes. Despite this, few physicians prescribe buprenorphine.

Objective

To examine barriers to obtaining waivers to prescribe buprenorphine.

Design

Cross-sectional survey study.

Participants

375 physicians attending HIV educational conferences in six cities in 2006.

Approach

Anonymous questionnaires were distributed and analyzed to test whether confidence addressing drug problems and perceived barriers to prescribing buprenorphine were associated with having a buprenorphine waiver, using chi-square, t tests, and logistic regression.

Results

25.1% of HIV physicians had waivers to prescribe buprenorphine. In bivariate analyses, physicians with waivers versus those without waivers were less likely to be male (51.1 vs 63.7%, p < .05), more likely to be in New York (51.1 vs 29.5%, p < .01), less likely to be infectious disease specialists (25.5 vs 41.6%, p < .05), and more likely to be general internists (43.6 vs 33.5%, p < .05). Adjusting for physician characteristics, confidence addressing drug problems (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.05, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.08–3.88) and concern about lack of access to addiction experts (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.32–0.97) were significantly associated with having a buprenorphine waiver.

Conclusions

Among HIV physicians attending educational conferences, confidence addressing drug problems was positively associated with having a buprenorphine waiver, and concern about lack of access to addiction experts was negatively associated with it. HIV physicians are uniquely positioned to provide opioid addiction treatment in the HIV primary care setting. Understanding and remediating barriers HIV physicians face may lead to new opportunities to improve outcomes for opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2005, vol. 17. 2006. Atlanta Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006, 1–47. Accessed 20 Jan 2007 at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/.

  2. Fleishman JA, Gebo KA, Reilly ED, et al. Hospital and outpatient health services utilization among HIV-infected adults in care 2000–2002. Med Care. 2005;43(9 suppl):40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro MF, Morton SC, McCaffrey DF, et al. Variations in the care of HIV-infected adults in the United States: results from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study. JAMA. 1999;281(24):2305–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnsten JH, Demas PA, Grant RW, et al. Impact of active drug use on antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(5):377–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lucas GM, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Highly active antiretroviral therapy in a large urban clinic: risk factors for virologic failure and adverse drug reactions. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(2):81–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucas GM, Cheever LW, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Detrimental effects of continued illicit drug use on the treatment of HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;27(3):251–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucas GM, Gebo KA, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Longitudinal assessment of the effects of drug and alcohol abuse on HIV-1 treatment outcomes in an urban clinic. AIDS. 2002;16(5):767–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palepu A, Horton NJ, Tibbetts N, Meli S, Samet JH. Uptake and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected people with alcohol and other substance use problems: the impact of substance abuse treatment. Addiction. 2004;99(3):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. New York City HIV/AIDS annual surveillance statistics. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2006. Accessed 25 Jan 2007 at http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/ah/hivtables.shtml (Updated 4 Dec 2006).

  10. Samet JH, Friedmann P, Saitz R. Benefits of linking primary medical care and substance abuse services: patient, provider, and societal perspectives. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(1):85–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Selwyn PA, Budner NS, Wasserman WC, Arno PS. Utilization of on-site primary care services by HIV-seropositive and seronegative drug users in a methadone maintenance program. Public Health Rep. 1993;108(4):492–500.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: detailed tables. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Sciences; 2006. Accessed 20 Jan 2007 at http://oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k5nsduh/tabs/2k5TabsCover.pdf.

  13. Office of National Drug Control Policy. Consultation document on opioid agonist treatment; 2003. Accessed 20 Jan 2007 at http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/science%5Ftech/methadone/metha3.html.

  14. Kissin W, McLeod C, Sonnefeld J, Stanton A. Experiences of a national sample of qualified addiction specialists who have and have not prescribed buprenorphine for opioid dependence. J Addict Dis. 2006;25(4):91–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saitz R, Friedmann PD, Sullivan LM, et al. Professional satisfaction experienced when caring for substance-abusing patients: faculty and resident physician perspectives. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(5):373–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner BJ, Laine C, Lin YT, Lynch K. Barriers and facilitators to primary care or human immunodeficiency virus clinics providing methadone or buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(15):1769–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson TP, Booth AL, Johnson P. Physician beliefs about substance misuse and its treatment: findings from a U.S. survey of primary care practitioners. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(8):1071–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedmann PD, McCullough D, Saitz R. Screening and intervention for illicit drug abuse: a national survey of primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(2):248–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geller G, Levine DM, Mamon JA, Moore RD, Bone LR, Stokes EJ. Knowledge, attitudes, and reported practices of medical students and house staff regarding the diagnosis and treatment of alcoholism. JAMA. 1989;261(21):3115–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cunningham CO, Sohler NL, McCoy K, Kunins HV. Attending physicians’ and residents’ attitudes and beliefs about prescribing buprenorphine at an urban teaching hospital. Fam Med. 2006;38(5):336–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sullivan LE, Tetrault J, Bangalore D, Fiellin DA. Training HIV physicians to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid dependence. Subst Abuse. 2006;27(3):13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Becker WC, Fiellin DA. Provider satisfaction with office-based treatment of opioid dependence. A systematic review. Subst Abuse. 2006;26(1):15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. West JC, Kosten TR, Wilk J, et al. Challenges in increasing access to buprenorphine treatment for opiate addiction. Am J Addict. 2004;13(suppl 1):S8–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chappel JN, Veach TL, Krug RS. The substance abuse attitude survey: an instrument for measuring attitudes. J Stud Alcohol. 1985;46(1):48–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Friedmann PD, McCullough D, Chin MH, Saitz R. Screening and intervention for alcohol problems. A national survey of primary care physicians and psychiatrists. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(2):84–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gottlieb NH, Mullen PD, McAlister AL. Patients’ substance abuse and the primary care physician: patterns of practice. Addict Behav. 1987;12(1):23–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ford C, Ryrie IA. A comprehensive package of support to facilitate the treatment of problem drug users in primary care: an evaluation of the training component. Int J Drug Policy. 2000;11(6):387–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller NS, Sheppard LM, Colenda CC, Magen J. Why physicians are unprepared to treat patients who have alcohol- and drug-related disorders. Acad Med. 2001;76(5):410–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Park ER, Wolfe TJ, Gokhale M, Winickoff JP, Rigotti NA. Perceived preparedness to provide preventive counseling: reports of graduating primary care residents at academic health centers. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(5):386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Isaacson JH, Fleming M, Kraus M, Kahn R, Mundt M. A national survey of training in substance use disorders in residency programs. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(6):912–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fleming MF, Manwell LB, Kraus M, Isaacson JH, Kahn R, Stauffacher EA. Who teaches residents about the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders? A national survey. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(9):725–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fleming M, Barry K, Davis A, Kropp S, Kahn R, Rivo M. Medical education about substance abuse: changes in curriculum and faculty between 1976 and 1992. Acad Med. 1994;69(5):362–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. SAMHSA/CSAT. SAMHSA/CSAT Evaluation of the Buprenorphine Waiver Program. Presented at the American Society of Addiction Medicine, May 2006. Accessed 24 May 2007 at http://buprenorphine.samhsa.gov/ASAM_06_Final_Results.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Donna Jacobsen and the staff of the IAS-USA, as well as Alexandra Bobadilla for their assistance with this project. This study was supported by the Center for AIDS Research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH AI-51519) and the Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, Special Projects of National Significance, Grant no. 6H97HA00247-04-03. Dr. Cunningham is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program.

Conflict of interest statement

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chinazo O. Cunningham MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, C.O., Kunins, H.V., Roose, R.J. et al. Barriers to Obtaining Waivers to Prescribe Buprenorphine for Opioid Addiction Treatment Among HIV Physicians. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 1325–1329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0264-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0264-7

KEY WORDS

Navigation