Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors of the Growing Influence of Clinical Practice Guidelines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the proliferation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), physicians have been slow to adopt them.

Objective

Describe changes in the reported effect of CPGs on physicians’ clinical practice over the past decade, and identify the practice characteristics associated with those changes.

Design and Participants

Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of rounds 1–4 of the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey, a nationally representative survey, conducted periodically between 1996 and 2005.

Measurements

The cross-sectional outcome was the reported effect of CPGs on the physician’s practice (very large, large, moderate, small, very small, and no effect). The longitudinal outcome was the change in reported effect of CPGs between two consecutive rounds for panel respondents. Independent variables included changes in physicians’ practice characteristics (size, ownership, capitation, availability of information technology (IT) to access guidelines, whether quality measures and profiling affect compensation, and revenue sources).

Results

The proportion of primary care physicians reporting that CPGs had a very large or large effect on their practice increased significantly from 1997 to 2005, from 16.4% to 38.7% (P < .0001). The corresponding change for specialists was 18.9% to 28.2% (P < .0001). In longitudinal multivariate analyses, practice characteristics associated with an increase in effect of CPGs included acquiring IT to access guidelines, an increase in the impact that quality measures and profiling have on compensation, and an increase in the proportion of practice revenue under capitation or derived from Medicaid.

Conclusions

Promotion of wider adoption of health IT, and financial incentives linked to validated quality measures, may facilitate further growth in the impact of CPGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(11):956–63 (Jun 1).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flores G, Lee M, Bauchner H, Kastner B. Pediatricians’ attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding clinical practice guidelines: a national survey. Pediatrics. 2000;105(3 Pt 1):496–501 (Mar).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997;156(12):1715–23 (Jun 15).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfe RM, Sharp LK, Wang RM. Family physicians’ opinions and attitudes to three clinical practice guidelines. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(2):150–7 (Mar–Apr).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ornstein S, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ, et al. A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(7):523–32 (Oct 5).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641–51 (May 7).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaix-Couturier C, Durand-Zaleski I, Jolly D, Durieux P. Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12(2):133–42 (Apr).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoenman J, Berk M, Feldman J, Singer A. Impact of differential response rates on the quality of data collected in the CTS physician survey. J Eval Health Prof. 2003;26(1):23–42 (Mar).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. http://www.guidelines.gov.

  11. Reschovsky J, Hadley J. Physician Financial Incentives: Use of Quality Incentives Inches Up: But Productivity Still Dominates. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change: 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hillman AL, Pauly MV, Kerstein JJ. How do financial incentives affect physicians’ clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations? N Engl J Med. 1989;321(2):86–92 (Jul 13).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Armour BS, Pitts MM, Maclean R, et al. The effect of explicit financial incentives on physician behavior. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(10):1261–6 (May 28).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham PJ, May JH. Medicaid patients increasingly concentrated among physicians. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change: 2006; tracking report no. 16 (Aug).

  15. Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians’ involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(3):843–53 (May–Jun).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grossman JM, Reed MC. Clinical information technology gaps persist among physicians. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change: 2006; issue brief no. 106 (Nov).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adams AS, Soumerai SB, Lomas J, Ross-Degnan D. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11(3):187–92 (Jun).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. New Engl J Med. 1999;341:1147–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294(6):716–24 (Aug 10).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramsey SD. Economic analyses and clinical practice guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:235–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Malley AS, Clancy C, Thompson J, Meyer G. Clinical practice guidelines vs. Performance measures: where do they differ and does it matter? Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30(3):163–71 (Mar).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Zhonghe L, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance. JAMA. 2005;294:1788–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Solberg LI, Taylor N, Conway WA, Hiatt RA. Large multispecialty group practices and quality improvement: what is needed to transform care? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30(1):9–17 (Jan–Mar).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The CTS Physician Survey was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to the Center for Studying Health System Change. Thanks to Michelle Banker for her assistance with MEDLINE searching and table preparation. Thanks as well to the anonymous reviewers whose comments contributed to the revised version of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Studying Health System Change, 600 Maryland Avenue, Southwest Suite 550, Washington, DC, 20024-2512, USA

    Ann S. O’Malley MD, MPH, Hoangmai H. Pham MD, MPH & James D. Reschovsky PhD

Authors
  1. Ann S. O’Malley MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hoangmai H. Pham MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James D. Reschovsky PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann S. O’Malley MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Malley, A.S., Pham, H.H. & Reschovsky, J.D. Predictors of the Growing Influence of Clinical Practice Guidelines. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 742–748 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0155-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0155-y

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation