Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Ten-Month Program in Curriculum Development for Medical Educators: 16 Years of Experience

  • Innovations in Education
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increased demand for new curricula in medical education, most academic medical centers have few faculty with training in curriculum development.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate a longitudinal mentored faculty development program in curriculum development.

DESIGN

A 10-month curriculum development program operating one half-day per week of each academic year from 1987 through 2003. The program was designed to provide participants with the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and experience to design, implement, evaluate, and disseminate curricula in medical education using a 6-step model.

PARTICIPANTS

One-hundred thirty-eight faculty and fellows from Johns Hopkins and other institutions and 63 matched nonparticipants.

MEASUREMENTS

Pre- and post-surveys from participants and nonparticipants assessed skills in curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation, as well as enjoyment in curriculum development and evaluation. Participants rated program quality, educational methods, and facilitation in a post-program survey.

RESULTS

Sixty-four curricula were produced addressing gaps in undergraduate, graduate, or postgraduate medical education. At least 54 curricula (84%) were implemented. Participant self-reported skills in curricular development, implementation, and evaluation improved from baseline (p < .0001), whereas no improvement occurred in the comparison group. In multivariable analyses, participants rated their skills and enjoyment at the end of the program significantly higher than nonparticipants (all p < .05). Eighty percent of participants felt that they would use the 6-step model again, and 80% would recommend the program highly to others.

CONCLUSIONS

This model for training in curriculum development has long-term sustainability and is associated with participant satisfaction, improvement in self-rated skills, and implementation of curricula on important topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epstein R, Hundert E. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of Deans. Educating Doctors to Provide High Quality Medical Care: A Vision for Medical Education in the United States. American Association of Medical Colleges; 2004.

  4. Institute of Medicine. Health Professions Education. A Bridge to Quality. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Institute of Medicine. Academic Health Centers: Leading Change in the 21st Century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Blue Ridge Academic Health Group. Reforming Medical Education: Urgent Priority for Academic Health Centers in the New Century. Atlanta, GA: The Robert W. Woodruff Health Sciences Center; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Common Program Requirements, February 2004. Available at http://www.acgme.org. Accessed May 27, 2006.

  8. Liasion Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to an M.D. Degree. Available at http://www.lcme.org. Accessed May 27, 2006.

  9. American Academy of Continuing Medical Education. AACME Accreditation Standards and Policies. Available at http://www.aaocme.org. Accessed May 27, 2006.

  10. Britton CV. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Workforce. Ensuring culturally effective pediatric care: implications for education and health policy. Pediatrics. 2004;114(6):1677–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME outcome project: enhancing residency education through outcomes assessment. Chicago (IL): Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2000. Available at http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/. Accessed May 27, 2006.

  12. Wilkerson L, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998;73(4):387–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark JM, Houston TK, Kolodner K, Branch WT Jr, Levine RB, Kern DE. Teaching the teachers: national survey of faculty development in departments of medicine of U.S. teaching hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(3):205–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheets KJ, Anderson WA. The reporting of curriculum development activities in the health professions. Teach Learn Med. 1991;3(4):221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gruppen LD, Frohna AZ, Anderson RM, Lowe KD. Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship. Acad Med. 2003;78(2):137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson WA, Stritter FT, Mygdal WK, Arndt JE, Reid A. Outcomes of three part-time faculty development programs. Fam Med. 1997;29(3):204–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cole KA, Barker LR, Kolodner K, Williamson P, Wright SM, Kern DE. Faculty development in teaching skills: an intensive longitudinal model. Acad Med. 2004;79(5):469–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Knight AM, Cole KA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Koldner K, Wright SM. Long-term follow-up of a longitudinal faculty development program in teaching skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):721–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Armstrong EG, Doyle J, Bennett NL. Transformative professional development of physicians as educators: assessment of a model. Acad Med. 2003;78(7):702–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinert Y, Nasmith L, McLeod PJ, Conochie L. A teaching scholars program to develop leaders in medical education. Acad Med. 2003;78(2):142–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenbaum ME, Lenoch S, Ferguson KJ. Outcomes of a teaching scholars program to promote leadership in faculty development. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17(3):247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Snyder S. A program to teach curriculum development to junior faculty. Fam Med. 2001;33(5):382–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Mygdal W, Bland CJ, et al. Faculty development. A resource for clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(Suppl 2):S56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Berman J, Bergen MR. Improving clinical teaching. Evaluation of a national dissemination program. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(6):1156–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Bergen MR, Sampson K, Deutsch SL. Regional teaching improvement programs for community-based teachers. Am J Med. 1999;106(1):76–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Houston TK, Clark JM, Levine RB, et al. Outcomes of a national faculty development program in teaching skills: prospective follow-up of 110 medicine faculty development teams. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1220–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levine SA, Caruso LB, Vanderschmidt H, Silliman RA, Barry PP. Faculty development in geriatrics for clinician educators: a unique model for skills acquisition and academic achievement. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(3):516–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McLaughlin SA. Faculty development. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(4):302e1–e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barondess J. The GPEP report: III. Faculty involvement. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(3):454–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Branch WT, Kroenke K, Levinson W. The clinician-educator—present and future roles. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(Suppl 2):S1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saha S, Christakis DA, Saint S, Whooley MA, Simon SR. A survival guide for generalist physicians in academic fellowships part 1: getting started. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(12):745–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Green ML. Identifying, appraising, and implementing medical education curricula: a guide for medical educators. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(10):889–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco J Jr, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada. A survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA. 1997;278(9):723–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fleming VM, Schindler N, Martin GJ, DaRosa DA. Separate and equitable promotion tracks for clinician-educators. JAMA. 2005;294(9):1101–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hafler JP, Lovejoy FH Jr. Scholarly activities recorded in the portfolios of teacher-clinician faculty. Acad Med. 2000;75(6):649–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Simpson D, Hafler J, Brown D, Wilkerson L. Documentation systems for educators seeking academic promotion in US medical schools. Acad Med. 2004;79(8):783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beasley BW, Wright SM. Looking forward to promotion: characteristics of participants in the prospective study of promotion in academia. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):705–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ken Kolodner, Sc.D., for critically reviewing the statistical methodology used in the paper.

Dr. Windish was a General Internal Medicine Fellow at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, at the time of project initiation, whereas Dr. Howard is currently retired and was previously affiliated with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna M. Windish MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Windish, D.M., Gozu, A., Bass, E.B. et al. A Ten-Month Program in Curriculum Development for Medical Educators: 16 Years of Experience. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 655–661 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0103-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0103-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation