Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient and physician perceptions of timely access to care

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timeliness of care is 1 of 6 dimensions of quality identified in Crossing the Quality Chasm. We compared patient and physician perceptions of appropriate timing of visits for common medical problems.

METHODS: This study was conducted at 2 internal medicine clinics at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Adult patients and companions, and outpatient General Internists were surveyed. The survey contained 11 clinical scenarios of varying urgency. Respondents indicated how soon the patient in each scenario should be seen. Responses ranged from that day to 1 to 3 months. Responses were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-two patients and 46 of 61 physicians responded. For 8 of the 11 scenarios patients felt they should be seen significantly earlier than physicians. Scenarios involving chronic knee and stomach pain, routine diabetes care, and hyperlipidemia generated the greatest differences. Patients and physicians agreed on the urgency of scenarios concerning wheezing in an asthmatic, an ankle injury, and acute pharyngitis.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients expected to be seen sooner than physicians thought necessary for many common chronic medical conditions, but are in agreement about timeliness for some acute problems. Understanding patient expectations may help physicians respond to requests for urgent evaluation of chronic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Health Care Quality Report 2004. Available at: http://www.qualitytools.ahrq.gov/qualityreport/browse/browse.aspx?id=5077. Accessed June 26, 2005.

  3. Jatulius DE, Bundek NI, Legorreta AP. Identifying predictors of satisfaction with assess to medical care and quality of care. Am J Med Qual. 1997;12:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jatulius DE, Meng YY, McDonald JP, Legorreta AP. Satisfaction with access to and quality of healthcare among medicare enrollees in a health maintenance organization. West J Med. 1997;166:242–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kurata JH, Nogawa AN, Phillips DM, Hoffmans S, Welbrun MN. Patient and provider satisfaction with medical care. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:176–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Merritt Hawkins & Associates 2004 Survey of Physician Appointment Wait Times. Available at: http://merritthawkins.com/pdf/mha2004-waitsurv.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2005.

  7. National Health Care Quality Report 2003. Available at: http://www.qualitytools.ahrq.gov/qualityreport/browse/browse.aspx?id=5080. Accessed June 26, 2005.

  8. Murray M, Berwick D. Advanced access. Reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schall MW, Duffy T, Krishnamurthy A, et al. Improving patient access to the Veteran Health Administration’s primary care and specialty clinics. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:415–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solberg LI, Hroscikoski MC, Sperl-Hillen JM, O’Connor PJ, Crabtree BF. Key Issues in transforming healthcare organizations for quality: the case for advanced access. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:15–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belardi FG, Weir S, Craig FW. A controlled trial of an advanced access appointment system in a residency family medicine center. Fam Med. 2004;36:341–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn E, Black C, Alonso J, Norregaard JC, Anderson GF. Patients’ acceptance of waiting for cataract surgery: what makes a wait too long? Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:1603–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho E, Coyte PC, Bombardier C, Hawker G, Wright JG. Ontario patients’ acceptance of waiting times for knee replacements. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2101–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramsay C, Walker MA. Waiting Your Turn: Hospital Wait Lists in Canada. 7th edn. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel D. Letter: advanced-access scheduling in primary care. JAMA. 2003;290:332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shuster M. Letter: advanced-access scheduling in primary care. JAMA. 2003;290:332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Solberg LI, Maciosek MV, Sperl-Hillen JM, et al. Does improved access to care affect utilization and costs for patients with chronic conditions? Am J Managed Care. 2004;10:717–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Barry MD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this article.

Funding: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, D.W., Melhado, T.V., Chacko, K.M. et al. Patient and physician perceptions of timely access to care. J Gen Intern Med 21, 130–133 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0246-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0246-1

Key words

Navigation