Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Transvaginal Posterior Colporrhaphy in Management of Anterior Rectocele

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Management of rectocele is challenging. Treatment usually starts with conservative measures and may involve surgical intervention in non-responding patients. We compared the outcomes of transvaginal posterior colporrhaphy (PC) and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in treatment of anterior rectocele.

Methods

Patients with anterior rectocele who underwent PC or LVMR were functionally assessed using Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) was used for clinical assessment, defecography for anatomic assessment, and manometry for physiologic assessment. In addition, quality of life was assessed.

Results

A total of 231 female patients with a mean age of 39 years were included to the study. One hundred fifty-nine underwent PC and 72 underwent LVMR. The LVMR group showed significantly a better functional outcome as compared with the PC group (p < 0.0001). The mean of CCCS at 1 year after LVMR was 6 ± 2.3 vs 9.2 ± 1.2 after PC. The mean of PISQ-12 at 1 year after LVMR was 39.3 ± 2.8 vs 35.8 ± 2.2 after PC. LVMR showed better anatomic correction by defecography, had significantly higher quality of life scores, and had a longer operative time as compared with PC, yet with comparable incidence of complications.

Conclusion

PC and LVMR are both effective treatment options for treatment of rectocele. LVMR was associated with better anatomic correction and greater improvement in constipation, sexual symptoms, and quality of life compared with PC. Although LVMR had a longer operation time than PC, the complication rate of the two procedures was comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ladd M, Tuma F. Rectocele. [Updated 2020 Feb 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546689/

  2. Dietz HP, Clarke B. Prevalence of Rectocele in Young Nulliparous Women. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005; 45(5):391-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.2005.00454.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zawodnik A, Balaphas A, Buchs NC, Zufferey G, Robert-Yap J, Buhler LH, et al. Does Surgical Approach in Pelvic Floor Repair Impact Sexual Function in Women? Sexual Medicine. 2019; 7(4):522-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2019.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Farid M, Madbouly KM, Hussein A, Mahdy T, Moneim HA, Omar W. Randomized Controlled Trial between Perineal and Anal Repairs of Rectocele in Obstructed Defecation. World Journal of Surgery 2010; 34(4): 822-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0390-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tso C, Lee W, Austin-Ketch T, Winkler H, Zitkus B. Nonsurgical Treatment Options for Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Nursing for Women's Health. 2018; 22(3):228-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2018.03.007.

  6. Maher C, Baessler K. Surgical Management of Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2006; 17(1):84-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1295-4

  7. Leanza V, Intagliata E, Leanza G, Cannizzaro MA, Zanghì G, Vecchio R. Surgical repair of rectocele. Comparison of Transvaginal and Transanal Approach and Personal Technique. Il Giornale Di Chirurgia. 2013; 34(11-12):332-336. https://doi.org/10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.251.

  8. Wong M, Meurette G, Abet E, Podevin J, Lehur PA. Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Complex Rectocoele. Colorectal Disease. 2011; 13:1019-1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02349.x.

  9. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic Ventral Recto(colpo)Pexy for Rectal Prolapse: Surgical Technique and Outcome for 109 Patients. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 20: 1919-1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0485-y.

  10. Baden WF, Walker T. Fundamentals, symptoms and classification. In: Baden WF, Walker T, eds. Surgical Repair of Vaginal Defects. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company; 1992. pp. 9-23. ISBN: 9780397511778

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The Standardization of Terminology of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1996; 175(1):10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A Constipation Scoring System to Simplify Evaluation and Management of Constipated Patients. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1996; 39(6):681-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02056950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A Short Form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2003; 14(3):164-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marquis P, De La Loge C, Dubois D, McDermott A, Chassany O. Development and Validation of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005; 40(5):540-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520510012208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short Forms of Two Condition-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaires for Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005; 193(1): 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.

  16. Jorge MJN, Wexner SD. Etiology and Management of Fecal Incontinence. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1993; 36(1):77-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050307.

  17. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Baessler K, Schluter PJ. Midline Rectovaginal Fascial Plication for Repair of Rectocele and Obstructed Defecation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004; 104(4):685-689. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000139833.48063.03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alawady M, Emile SH, Abdelnaby M, Elbanna H, Farid M. Posterolateral versus lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2018; 33:1461-1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3087-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal with Evaluation in A Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of A Survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004; 240:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

  20. Nieminen K, Hiltunen KM, Laitinen J, Oksala J, Heinonen PK. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1636-1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0656-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Balata M, Elgendy H, Emile SH, Youssef M, Omar W, Khafagy W. Functional Outcome and Sexual-Related Quality of Life after Transperineal versus Transvaginal Repair of Anterior Rectocele: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2020; 63(4):527-537. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001595.

  22. Formijne Jonkers HA, Poierrié N, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(6):695-699. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eustice S, Endacott R, Morris J, Shankar R, Kent B. Women’s Experiences of Managing Digitation: Do We Ask Enough in Primary Care? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2018; 9(8):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2054270418783616.

  24. Hagen S, Stark D, Glazener C, Dickson S, Barry S, Elders A, et al. Individualised Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POPPY): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet. 2014; 383 (9919):796-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61977-7.

  25. Youssef M, Emile SH, Thabet W, Elfeki H A, Magdy A, Omar W, et al. (2017) Comparative Study Between Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery; 2:380-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3299-4.

  26. Emile SH, Elfeki HA, Youssef M, Farid M, Wexner SD. Abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(1):O13-O24. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mahmoud Abdelnaby and Mohammad Fathy designed the study, performed the surgical procedures, and followed the patients. Sameh Emile, Mohammad Fathy, and Hany Mikhail shared in data analysis and writing of the manuscript. Mohamed Balata, Mohamed Arnous and Emad Abdallah contributed to interpretation of data and revised the manuscript. Mahmoud Abdelnaby critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sameh Hany Emile.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The abstract of this manuscript has been accepted as a poster presentation in the virtual ESCP's 15th Scientific and Annual Conference, Vilnius 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelnaby, M., Fathy, M., Abdallah, E. et al. Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Transvaginal Posterior Colporrhaphy in Management of Anterior Rectocele. J Gastrointest Surg 25, 2035–2046 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04823-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04823-z

Keywords

Navigation