Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Major Versus Minor Hepatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The objective of the current study was to investigate both short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by extent of hepatic resection relative to overall final pathological margin status.

Methods

One thousand twenty-three patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Demographic, clinicopathological, and operative data, as well as overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among patients undergoing major and minor resection before and after propensity score matching.

Results

Overall, 608 (59.4%) patients underwent major hepatectomy, while 415 (40.6%) had a minor resection. Major hepatectomy was more frequently performed among patients who had large, multiple, and bilobar tumors. Roughly half of patients (n = 294, 48.4%) developed a postoperative complication following major hepatectomy versus only one fourth of patients (n = 113, 27.2%) after minor resection (p < 0.001). In the propensity model, patients who underwent major hepatectomy had an equivalent OS and RFS versus patients who had a minor hepatectomy (median OS, 38 vs. 37 months, p = 0.556; and median RFS, 20 vs. 18 months, p = 0.635). Patients undergoing major resection had comparable OS and RFS with wide surgical margin (≥10 and 5–9 mm), but improved RFS when surgical margin was narrow (1–4 mm) versus minor resection in the propensity model. In the Cox regression model, tumor characteristics and surgical margin were independently associated with long-term outcome.

Conclusions

Major hepatectomy for ICC was not associated with an overall survival benefit, yet was associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Margin width, rather than the extent of resection, affected long-term outcomes. Radical parenchymal-sparing resection should be advocated if a margin clearance of ≥5 mm can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26(3):269–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, et al. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2014; 149(6):565–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Pawlik TM. Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017; 6(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS, et al. Forty-year trends in cholangiocarcinoma incidence in the U.S.: intrahepatic disease on the rise. Oncologist 2016; 21(5):594–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2014; 60(6):1268–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou XD, Tang ZY, Fan J, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: report of 272 patients compared with 5,829 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2009; 135(8):1073–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown KM, Parmar AD, Geller DA. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2014; 23(2):231–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, et al. The impact of surgical margin status on long-term outcome after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22(12):4020–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spolverato G, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, et al. Management and outcomes of patients with recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following previous curative-intent surgical resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23(1):235–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade among patients undergoing resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(7):1284–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyder O, Hatzaras I, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Recurrence after operative management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2013; 153(6):811–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Terminology Committee of the IHPBA. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB (Oxford) 2000; 2:333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ubink I, Jongen JM, Nijkamp MW, et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after major liver surgery and extended hemihepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2016; 15(4):e193-e198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yasui M, Harada A, Torii A, et al. Impaired liver function and long-term prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 1995; 19(3):439–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nadig DE, Wade TP, Fairchild RB, et al. Major hepatic resection. Indications and results in a national hospital system from 1988 to 1992. Arch Surg 1997; 132(2):115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahiya D, Wu TJ, Lee CF, et al. Minor versus major hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients: a 20-year experience. Surgery 2010; 147(5):676–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, et al. Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 2002; 131(3):311–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart GD, O'Suilleabhain CB, Madhavan KK, et al. The extent of resection influences outcome following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30(4):370–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Couinaud C. Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Dig Surg 1999; 16(6):459–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Edge S BD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.

  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(23):3140–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bagante F, Spolverato G, Cucchetti A, et al. Defining when to offer operative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a regret-based decision curves analysis. Surgery 2016; 160(1):106–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, et al. Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: toward zero hospital deaths. Ann Surg 1999; 229(3):322–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Inoue K, et al. No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients: is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach. Arch Surg 1999; 134(9):984–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lang BH, Poon RT, Fan ST, et al. Perioperative and long-term outcome of major hepatic resection for small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Arch Surg 2003; 138(11):1207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Long-term prognosis after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(5):1094–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Simonetti RG, Camma C, Fiorello F, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. A worldwide problem and the major risk factors. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36(7):962–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Farges O, Malassagne B, Flejou JF, et al. Risk of major liver resection in patients with underlying chronic liver disease: a reappraisal. Ann Surg 1999; 229(2):210–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, et al. Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1997; 25(1):87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaibori M, Matsui Y, Hijikawa T, et al. Comparison of limited and anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C. Surgery 2006; 139(3):385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Karanjia ND, Lordan JT, Quiney N, et al. A comparison of right and extended right hepatectomy with all other hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases: a ten-year study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35(1):65–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moris D, Ronnekleiv-Kelly S, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Felekouras E, Dillhoff M, Schmidt C, Pawlik TM. Parenchymal-Sparing Versus Anatomic Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21(6):1076–1085. doi:10.1007/s11605-017-3397-y.

  34. Grazi GL, Ercolani G, Pierangeli F, et al. Improved results of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis give the procedure added value. Ann Surg 2001; 234(1):71–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, et al. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 2015; 121(16):2730–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

X.-F. Z. was supported in part by the China Scholarship Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy M. Pawlik.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, XF., Bagante, F., Chakedis, J. et al. Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Major Versus Minor Hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 1841–1850 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3499-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3499-6

Keywords

Navigation