Abstract
Introduction
Returns to the operating room (ROR) have been suggested as a marker of surgical quality. Increasingly, quality and value metrics are utilized for reimbursement as well as public reporting to inform health care consumers. We sought to understand the etiology of ROR and assess the validity of simple ROR as a quality metric.
Methods
This was a single referral center retrospective review of all colon and rectal operations between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. Surgical Systems Nurse + was constructed and validated at our institution for classifying ROR as either an unplanned return to the OR, planned return due to complications, planned staged return, or an unrelated return. The primary outcome was the classification of ROR and total number of ROR within 30 days.
Results
Of the 2389 colorectal patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014; 214 returned to the operating room within 30 days (9.0%). Among the 214 patients, there were a total of 232 ROR with an average of 1.1 ROR per patient (range 1–4); 90 (38.8%) were unplanned ROR, 49 (21.1%) were planned returns due to complications, 92 (39.7%) were planned staged returns, and 1 (0.4%) were unrelated ROR. The most common reason for an unplanned ROR was an anastomotic leak (n = 21; 9.1%). Overall, unplanned reoperations were rare events (n = 90/2389; 3.8%), largely comprised of patients experiencing an anastomotic abscess or leak (n=21/2389; 0.9%).
Conclusions
In a high volume and complexity academic colon and rectal surgery practice, RORs within 30 days occurred after 10.4% of cases. Unplanned ROR were relatively rare and most commonly associated with an anastomotic leak. Since the majority of ROR were planned-staged returns, overall rate of ROR should be questioned as a metric of surgical quality. Perhaps, the anastomotic leak rate may be a better metric to monitor for quality improvement efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birkmeyer, J.D., et al., Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg, 2001. 136(4): p. 405–11.
Kroon, H.M., P.J. Breslau, and J.W. Lardenoye, Can the incidence of unplanned reoperations be used as an indicator of quality of care in surgery? Am J Med Qual, 2007. 22(3): p. 198–202.
Guevara, O.A., J.A. Rubio-Romero, and A.I. Ruiz-Parra, Unplanned reoperations: is emergency surgery a risk factor? A cohort study. J Surg Res, 2013. 182(1): p. 11–6.
Ricciardi, R., et al., How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections? Colorectal Dis, 2012. 14(4): p. 515–21.
Lin Y., et al., An institutional analysis of unplanned return to the operating room to identify areas of quality improvement. The American Journal of Surgery. 2016. in press.
Farquhar, M., AHRQ Quality Indicators, in Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, R.G. Hughes, Editor. 2008: Rockville (MD).
Hyman, N., et al., Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg, 2007. 245(2): p. 254–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors were involved in study design, data analysis, drafting, and final approval of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Sources of Funding
None.
Additional information
Poster presentation at ASCRS May 2016, Los Angeles, CA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lightner, A.L., Glasgow, A.E., Habermann, E.B. et al. Returns to Operating Room After Colon and Rectal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center: a Valid Measure of Surgical Quality?. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 1048–1054 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3403-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3403-4