Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement for Treatment of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

  • 2016 SSAT Plenary Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement is considered a safe alternative to cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC), but data regarding long-term outcomes following PCT are limited.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional experience of patients undergoing PCT for ACC between 1997 and 2015. Recurrent biliary events were defined as cholecystitis, cholangitis, or gallstone pancreatitis.

Results

PCT was placed for 288 patients with ACC. Mean age and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index were 72 ± 15 years and 5.3 ± 2.4, respectively. Following PCT placement, 91% of patients successfully resolved their episode of ACC. PCT dysfunction occurred in 132 patients (46%), with 80 patients (28%) requiring re-intervention, while 7% developed procedure-related complications. Interval cholecystectomy reduced the risk of recurrent biliary events to 7% from 21% (p = 0.002). Cholecystectomy was completed laparoscopically in 45% of patients receiving an interval operation vs. 22% of those undergoing urgent surgery for PCT failure or recurrent biliary event (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

PCT placement is a highly successful treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis and is associated with low complication rate, but high rate of tube dysfunction requiring frequent re-intervention. Interval cholecystectomy is associated with a decreased likelihood of recurrent biliary events and increased likelihood of successful laparoscopic completion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strasberg SM. Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2804–2811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirota M, Miura F, Mayummi T, Yoshida M, Strasberg S, Pitt HA, de Santibanes E, Belghiti J, Büchler MW, Gouma DJ, Fan ST, Hilvano SC, Lau JWY, Kim SW, Belli G, Windsor JA, Liau KH, Sachakul V. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lorenz JM. Evaluating the controversial role of cholecystostomy in current clinical practice. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011;28:444–449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gurusamy KS, Rossi M, Davidson BR. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8,CD007088.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith TJ, Manske JG, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN. Changing trends and outcomes in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 2013;257:1112–1115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J. Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1343–1351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeo CSW, Tay, VWY, Low JK, Woon WWL, Punamiya SJ, Shelat VG. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2016;23:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang WS, Lim JU, Joo KR, Cha JM, Shin HP, Joo SH. Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery. Surg Endosc 2015;29:2359–2364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang CH, Wu CY, Yang JC, Lien WC, Wang HP, Liu KL, Wu YM, Chen SC. Long-term outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis after successful percutaneous cholecystostomy treatment and the risk factors for recurrence: a decade experience at a single center. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanjay P, Mittapalli D, Marioud A, White RD, Ram R, Alijani A. Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a multicenter analysis. HPB 2013;15:511–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogelzang RL, Nemcek AA Jr. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy. Radiology 1988;168:29–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Senapati PSP, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survery of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003;85:306–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB 2009;11:183–193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Melin MM, Sarr MG, Bender CE, van Heerden JA. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a valuable technique in high-risk patients with presumed acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 1995;82:1274–1277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Macri A, Scuderi G, Saladino E, Trimarchi G, Terranova M, Versaci A, Famulari C. Acute gallstone cholecystitis in the elderly. Surg Endosc 2006;20:88–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schäfer M. Percutaneous drainage versus emergent cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 2011;35:826–833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cherng N, Witkowski ET, Sneider EB, Wiseman JT, Lewis J, Litwin DEM, Santry HP, Cahan M, Shah SA. Use of cholecystostomy tubes in the management of patients with primary diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegård J, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen FV. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience. HPB 2015;17:326–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welschbillig-Meunier K, Pessaux P, Lebigot J, Lermite L, Aube C, Brehant O, Hamy A, Arnaud JP. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1256–1259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. England RE, McDermott VG, Smith TP, Suhock PV, Payne CS, Newman GE. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: who responds? AJR 1997;168:1247–1251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson JE, Chang DC, Talamini MA. A nationwide examination of outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy compared with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, 1998–2010. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3406–3411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khasawneh MA, Shamp A, Heller S, Zielinski MD, Jenkins DH, Osborn JB, Morris DS. Successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78:100–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bergman S, Al-Bader M, Sourial N, Vedel I, Hanna WC, Bilek AJ, Galatas C, Marek JE, Fraser SA. Recurrence of biliary disease following non-operative management in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3485–3490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spira RM, Nissan A, Zamir O, Cohen T, Fields SI, Freund HR. Percutaneous trasnhepatic cholecystostomy in critically ill patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2002;183:62–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. To KB, Cherry-Bukowiec JR, Englesbe MJ, Terjimanian MN, Shijie C, Campbell DA Jr, Napolitano LM. Emergent versus elective cholecystectomy: conversion rates and outcomes. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013;14:512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Halbert C, Pagkratis S, Yang J, Meng Z, Altieri MS, Parikh P, Pryor A, Talamini M, Telem DA. Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2239–2243. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4485-2.

  27. Ha JP, Tsui KK, Tang CN, Siu WT, Fung KH, Li MK. Cholecystectomy or not after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:1497–1502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Karsten T, Kruyt PM, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Kelder JC, Tromp E, Boerma D. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012;13:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contribution

We hereby certify that all listed co-authors were integrally involved in the formation of this manuscript via study conception/design and/or data acquisition and analysis/interpretation. Furthermore, all authors made significant contributions to the drafting or critical revisions of the manuscript, and all authors gave final approval prior to submission for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Fagenholz.

Ethics declarations

No grants or other forms of funding or assistance were utilized in the formation of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alvino, D.M.L., Fong, Z.V., McCarthy, C.J. et al. Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement for Treatment of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 761–769 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3375-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3375-4

Keywords

Navigation