Skip to main content
Log in

Spray Diathermy Versus Harmonic Scalpel Technique for Hepatic Parenchymal Transection of Living Donor

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Liver parenchymal transection is the most invasive and challenging part in the living donor operation. The study was planned to compare the safety, efficacy, and outcome of harmonic scalpel versus spray diathermy as a method of parenchymal liver transection in donor hepatectomy.

Patient and Method

Eighty consecutive patients, who were treated by living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), were included in the study. The study population was divided into two groups according to the method of liver transection: group A by harmonic scalpel (HS) and group B by spray diathermy (SD). The primary outcome was the volume of blood loss during transection. Secondary outcomes were time of transection, number of ligatures needed during transection, pathological changes at cut surface, postoperative morbidities, cost, and hospital stay

Results

Blood loss during overall liver transection and in each zone was significantly less in the SD than in the HS group (P = 0.015). The number of ligatures was significantly less in the SD than in the HS group (P = 0.0001). The SD group had significantly higher level of serum bilirubin, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), and international normalized ratio (INR) levels on postoperative day 3 than the HS group. Lateral tissue coagulation and hepatic necrosis are significantly less in HS group. The overall incidence of postoperative morbidities was the same in both groups. The cost was higher in HS group than SD group (US$760 vs. US$40 P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Spray diathermy is an effective method of parenchymal transection with significantly lower blood loss and lower cost compared to HS with no increase in morbidity. HS is associated with earlier recovery of liver functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salah T, Sultan MA, Fathy MO, Elshobary MM, Elghawalby AN, Sultan A, et al. Outcome of Right Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donors: A Single Egyptian Center Experience J Gastrointest Surg (2012) 16:1181–1188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdel Wahab M, Hamed H, Salah T, Elsarraf W, Elshobary M, Sultan MA et al. Problem of living liver donation in the absence of deceased liver transplantation program: Mansoura experience. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(37): 13607–13614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Busuttil RW, Farmer DG, Yersiz H, Hiatt JR, McDiarmid SV, Goldstein LI et al. Analysis of long-term outcomes of 3200 liver transplantations over two decades: a single center experience. Ann Surg. 2005;241:905–918.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maluf DG, Stravitz RT, Cotterall AH, Posner MP, Nakatsuka M, Sterling RK et al. Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 6-year single center experience. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:149 –156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El Moghazy WM, Hedaya MS, Kaido T, Egawa H, Uemoto S, Takada Y. Two different methods for donor hepatic transection: cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator with bipolar cautery versus cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator with radiofrequency coagulator-A randomized controlled trial. Liver Transpl. 2009;15(1):102–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takatsuki M, Eguchi S, Yamanouchi K, Tokai H, Hidaka M, Soyama A, et al. Two-surgeon technique using saline-linked electric cautery and ultrasonic surgical aspirator in living donor hepatectomy: its safety and efficacy. Am J Surg. 2009;197(2):e25–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, Sakaguchi T, Matsushima H, Matsui Y, Kwon AH. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery. 2013;154(5):1046–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahbari NN, Koch M, Schmidt T, Motschall E, Bruckner T, Weidmann K, et al. Meta-analysis of the clamp-crushing technique for transection of the parenchyma in elective hepatic resection: back to where we started? AnnSurg Oncol. 2009;16(3):630–639.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, Bruckner T, Vogler P, Striebel F et al. Clamp-crushing versus stapler hepatectomy for transection of the parenchyma in elective hepatic resection (CRUNSH)--a randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2011;11:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jagannath P, Chhabra DG, Sutariya KR, Shah RC. Fusion technique for liver transection with Kelly-clysis and harmonic technology. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):101–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poon RT. Current techniques of liver transection. HPB (Oxford) 2007;9(3):166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K, et al. Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg. 2001;136(8):922–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bodzin AS, Leiby BE, Ramirez CG, Frank AM, Doria C. Liver resection using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) versus harmonic scalpel: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):500–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesuret M, Selzner M, Petrowsky H, McCormack L, Clavien PA. How should transection of liver be performed? A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies. Ann Surg 2005, 242:814–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saiura A, Yamamoto J, Koga R, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Seki M et al. Usefulness of Ligasure for liver resection: analysis by randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 2006, 192:41–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reed DN Jr, Vitale GC, Wrightson WR, Edwards M, McMasters K.. Decreasing mortality of bile leaks after elective hepatic surgery. Am J Surg 2003, 185:316–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nanashima A, Tobinaga S, Abo T, Nonaka T, Sawai T, Nagayasu T. Usefulness of the combination procedure of crash clamping and vessel sealing for hepaticresection. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(2):179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schemmer P, Friess H, Hinz U, Mehrabi A, Kraus TW, Z’graggen K et al. Stapler hepatectomy is a safe dissection technique: analysis of 300 patients. World J Surg 2006, 30:419–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, Tsumura H, Watanabe Y, Kojima K, Futagawa S. Hepatic resection using the harmonic scalpel. Surg Today 2000, 30:959–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gotohda N, Konishi M, Takahashi S, Kinoshita T, Kato Y, Kinoshita T. Surgical outcome of liver transection bythe crush-clamping technique combined withHarmonic FOCUS™. World J Surg. 2012;36(9):2156–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, Vogler P, Striebel F, Bruckner T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of stapler versus clamp-crushing transection in elective liver resection. Br J Surg. 2014;101(3):200–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Kokudo N, Seki M, Kosuge T, Yamaguchi Tet al. Bloodless liver resection using the monopolar floating ball plus ligasure diathermy: preliminary results of 16 liver resections. World J Surg. 2004;28:166–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber JC, Navarra G, Jiao LR, Nicholls JP, Jensen SL, Habib NA. New technique for liver resection using heat coagulative necrosis. Ann Surg. 2002;236:560–563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan Y, Gotoh M. Biliary complications in living liver donors. Surg Today 2010;40:411–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultan AM, Salah T, Elshobary MM, Fathy OM, Elghawalby AN, Yassen AM, et al. Biliary complications in living donor right hepatectomy are affected by the method of bile duct division. Liver Transpl 2014;20:1393–1401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shin M, Song S, Kim JM, Kwon CH, Kim SJ, Lee SK, et al. Donor morbidity including biliary complications in living-donor liver transplantation: single-center analysis of 827 cases. Transplantation 2012;93:942–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim J, Ahmad SA, Lowy AM, Buell JF, Pennington LJ, Soldano DA et al. Increased biliary fistulas after liver resection with the harmonic scalpel. Am Surg 2003;69:815–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanyong S, Wanyee L, Siyuan F, Hui L, Yuan Y, Chuan L, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial: comparison of two different methods of hepatectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(2):243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gurusamy KS, Pamecha V, Sharma D, Davidson BR. Techniques for liver parenchymal transection in liver resection (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2009;(1):CD006880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pamecha V, Gurusamy KS, Sharma D, Davidson BR. Techniques for liver parenchymal transection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford). 2009; 11(4): 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Simillis C, Li T, Vaughan J, Becker LA, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD010683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

Mohamed El Shobary and Ayman El Nakeeb designed the research. Mohamed El Shobary, Tarek salah, Ayman El Nakeeb, Ahmad M Sultan, Ahmed Elghawalby, Omar Fathy, Mohamed Abdel Wahab, Amro Yassen, Mohamed Elmorshedy, Wagdi F. Elkashef, Usama Shiha, and Mohamed Elsadany performed the research. Mohamed El Shobary, Ayman El Nakeeb, and Ahmed M Sultan analyzed the data. Mohamed El Shobary and Ayman El Nakeeb wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman El Nakeeb.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No financial support.

Additional information

This manuscript has neither been submitted for publication in any other journal and will not subsequently be submitted for potential publication in another journal until a decision has been made nor has it been published previously in any media.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(WMV 106892 kb)

ESM 2

(WMV 179606 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Shobary, M., salah, T., El Nakeeb, A. et al. Spray Diathermy Versus Harmonic Scalpel Technique for Hepatic Parenchymal Transection of Living Donor. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 321–329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3312-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3312-y

Keywords

Navigation