Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized Controlled Trial for Evaluation of the Routine Use of Nasogastric Tube Decompression After Elective Liver Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The value of routine nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression after elective hepatetctomy is not yet established. Previous studies in the setting of non-liver abdominal surgery suggested that the use of NGT decreased the incidence of nausea or vomiting, while increasing the frequency of pulmonary complications.

Study Design

Out of a total of 284 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy, 210 patients were included in this study. The patients were randomized to a group that received NGT decompression (NGT group; n = 108), in which a NGT was left in place after surgery until the patient passed flatus or stool, or a group that did not receive NGT decompression (no-NGT group; n = 102), in which the NGT was removed at the end of surgery.

Results

There were no differences between the NGT group and no-NGT group in terms of the overall morbidity (34.3 vs 35.3 %; P = 0.99), incidence of pulmonary complications (18.5 vs 19.5 %; P = 0.84), frequency of postoperative vomiting (6.5 vs 7.8 %; P = 0.70), time to start of oral intake (median (range) 3 (2–6) vs 3 (2–6) days; P = 0.69), or postoperative duration of hospital stay (19 (7–74) vs 18 (9–186) days; P = 0.37). In the no-NGT group, three patients required reinsertion of the tube 0 (0–3) days after surgery. In the NGT group, severe discomfort was recorded in five patients.

Conclusions

Routine NGT decompression after elective hepatectomy does not appear to have any advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levin AL. A new gastroduodenal catheter. JAMA 1921; 76: 1007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nathan BN, Pain JA. Nasogastric suction after elective abdominal surgery: a randomised study. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1991; 73: 291–294.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Feo CV, Romanini B, Sortini D, et al. Early oral feeding after colorectal resection: a randomized controlled study. ANZ journal of surgery 2004; 74: 298–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Verma R, Nelson RL. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, CD004929 (2010).

  5. Vermeulen H, Storm-Versloot MN, Busch OR, et al. Nasogastric intubation after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of recent literature. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill: 1960) 2006; 141: 307–314.

  6. Carrere N, Seulin P, Julio CH, et al. Is nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression necessary after gastrectomy? A prospective randomized trial. World journal of surgery 2007; 31: 122–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Savassi-Rocha PR, Conceicao SA, Ferreira JT, et al. Evaluation of the routine use of the nasogastric tube in digestive operation by a prospective controlled study. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics 1992; 174: 317–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrelli NJ, Stulc JP, Rodriguez-Bigas M, et al. Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study. The American surgeon 1993; 59: 632–635.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, et al. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Annals of surgery 1995; 221: 469–476; discussion 476–468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi YY, Kim J, Seo D, et al. Is routine nasogastric tube insertion necessary in pancreaticoduodenectomy? Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2011; 81: 257–262.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao W, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. The role of nasogastric tube in decompression after elective colon and rectum surgery: a meta-analysis. International journal of colorectal disease 2011; 26: 423–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pessaux P, Regimbeau JM, Dondero F, et al. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection. The British journal of surgery 2007; 94: 297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ephgrave KS, Kleiman-Wexler R, Pfaller M, et al. Postoperative pneumonia: a prospective study of risk factors and morbidity. Surgery 1993; 114: 815–819; discussion 819–821.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman M, Baim H, Shelton V, et al. Laryngeal injuries secondary to nasogastric tubes. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 1981; 90: 469–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manning BJ, Winter DC, McGreal G, et al. Nasogastric intubation causes gastroesophageal reflux in patients undergoing elective laparotomy. Surgery 2001; 130: 788–791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor FW. Electrolyte loss by postoperative nasal-gastric suction. AMA archives of surgery 1953; 66: 538–544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Imamura.

Ethics declarations

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Juntendo University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients participating in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ichida, H., Imamura, H., Yoshimoto, J. et al. Randomized Controlled Trial for Evaluation of the Routine Use of Nasogastric Tube Decompression After Elective Liver Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 20, 1324–1330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3116-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3116-0

Keywords

Navigation