Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Which Failed to Achieve Accrual Targets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Methods

A single-center RCT of patients affected by resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma which included arm A (surgery alone) and arm B (neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery). The primary endpoint was R0 resection; the secondary endpoints were toxicity; number of patients who completed the neoadjuvant therapy; radiological and pathological response after chemoradiation; and pTNM stage, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and overall and disease-free survival. A sample size of 32 patients was required for each group.

Results

The study was terminated early, and 38 patients were randomized: 20 in arm A and 18 in arm B. There was no significant difference regarding R0 resection rate in the two groups (intention-to-treat, OR = 1.91, P = 0.489). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was completed in 14 out of 18 cases (77.8 %) and the radiological and pathological response was efficacious in 72.3 and 90.9 % of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was feasible, safe, and efficacious, although non-significant results were obtained as a result of the underpowered data due to the difficulty in recruiting patients. Additional multicenter RCTs are needed in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gooiker GA, vanGijn W, Wouters MWJM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2011;98:485–494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Nordling S, Pukkala E, et al. Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut 2005;54:385–387.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter A, Niedergetnmann M, Sturm JW, et al. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25 years experience. World J Surg 2003;27:324–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg 1985;120:899–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmond T, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg 1999;230:776–782.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:1576–1585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1200–1210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of rancreatic cancer. A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2007;297:267–277.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams RA et al. Fluorouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299:1019–1026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:1073–1081.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brunner TB. Neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: an emerging paradigm? Curr Oncol Rep 2013;15:162–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wayne JD, Abdalla EK, Wolff RA et al. Localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: the rationale for preoperative chemoradiation. Oncologist 2002;7:34–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spitz FR, Abruzzese JL, Lee JE, et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:928–937.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mornex F, Girard N, Delpero J et al. Radiochemotherapy in the management of pancreatic cancer—part I: neoadjuvant treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 2005;15:226–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pingpank JF, Hoffman JP, Ross EA, et al. Effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on surgical margin status of resected adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5:121–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000267.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Assifi MM, Lu X, Eibl G, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of phase II trials. Surgery 2011;150:466–473.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andriulli A, Festa V, Botteri E, et al. Neoadjuvant/preoperative gemcitabine for patients with localized pancreatic cancer: a mata-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:1644–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu CP, Xue XJ, Liang N, et al. Effect of chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2014;140:549–559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Golcher H, Brunner TB, Witzigmann H, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin and surgery versus immediate surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer. Results of the first prospective randomized phase II trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; DOI 10.1007/s00066-014-0737-7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:567–579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takai S, Satoi S, Toyokawa H, et al. Clinicopathological evaluation after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a retrospective, single-institution experience. Pancreas 2003;26:243–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann Surg. 1992;215:231–236.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982;5:649–655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Le Scodan R, Mornex F, Partensky C, et al. Histopathological response to preoperative chemoradiation for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The French Phase II FFCD 9704-SFRO Trial. Am J Clin Oncol 2008;31: 545–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2006;93:1232–1237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1341–1346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (RECIST guidelines). J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. White RR, Xie HB, Gottfried MR et al. Significance of histological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:214–221.

  31. Lüttges J, Zamboni G and Klöppel G. Recommendation for the examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens removed from patients with carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas. Dig Surg 1999;16:291–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Exocrine pancreas in Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al. (eds): AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (Ed.6). New York, Springer, 2002, pp157-164.

  33. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al. Postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH)—an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011;149:680–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al. 1423 Pancreaticuodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1199–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, Offerhaus GJ et al. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an update. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:549–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patients who participated in this study. We thank Prof. Roberto Corinaldesi (Bologna, Italy) who coordinated the study and Nicola Zanini and Giovanni Taffurelli, medical doctors, who helped us to recruit the patients.

Disclosure

No commercial interest, financial source, or material support to disclose.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Casadei.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 851 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casadei, R., Di Marco, M., Ricci, C. et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Which Failed to Achieve Accrual Targets. J Gastrointest Surg 19, 1802–1812 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2890-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2890-4

Keywords

Navigation