Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative Outcome After Pancreatic Head Resection: a 10-Year Series of a Specialized Surgeon in a University Hospital and a Community Hospital

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Hospital and surgeon volume are potential factors influencing postoperative mortality and morbidity after pancreatic resection. Data on perioperative outcome of individual surgeons in different institutions, however, are scarce. We evaluated the perioperative outcome after pancreatic head resections (PHR) performed by a high-volume pancreatic surgeon in a high-volume university department and (later) in a community hospital with low prior experience in major pancreatic surgery.

Methods

We compared the results after PHR were performed by a single experienced surgeon between 2001 and October 2006 in a specialized unit of a German university hospital (n = 83; group A) with the results after PHR were performed in a community hospital between November 2006 and 2011 (n = 145; group B). Before the study period (−2001), the surgeon already had a personal caseload of >200 PHR. In addition to the 228 PHR analyzed here, the surgeon also had taught further >150 PHR to residents and consulting surgeons. Comparable surgical and perioperative techniques were applied in both series (e.g., types of resection and reconstruction, abdominal drains, early enteral feeding). The data of both series were prospectively recorded in SPSS databases.

Results

The median age of the patients was lower in group A (58 vs. 66 years in B; p < 0.01). Indications for PHR were pancreatic cancer (A 39 % vs. B 45 %), other periampullary cancer (A 18 % vs. B 12 %), chronic pancreatitis (A 33 % vs. B 28 %), and others (A 10 % vs. B 15 %). Most PHR were pylorus preserving (64 vs. 75 %), with oncologically indicated portal vein resections in 24 % (A) or 33 % (B). The percentage of duodenum-preserving PHR was lower in group B (14 vs. 26 % in A). Mortality of PHR was 3.6 % in group A and 2.8 % in B (p = 0.72). Overall morbidity rate was 49 % (A) or 57 % (B; p = 0.25). Using the expanded Accordion classification, complications classified as grade 4 or higher occurred in 9 % (A) and 11 % (B; p = 0.74). Postoperative pancreatic leak (any grade) was documented in 26 % (A) and 25 % (B; p = 0.87).

Conclusions

Surgeon volume and a high individual experience, respectively, contribute to acceptable complication rates and low mortality rates after pancreatic head resection. An experienced surgeon can provide a good perioperative outcome after pancreatic resection even after a change of hospital or medical staff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–2127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007;245:777–783.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA. High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center? J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1709–1716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005;242:540–544.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131:6–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, Cramer LD, Guillem JG, Bach PB, Begg CB. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 2002;236:583–592.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simunovic M, To T, Langer B. Influence of hospital volume on mortality following major cancer surgery. JAMA 1999;281:1374–1375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, McPhee JT, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2009;249:635–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gouma DJ and Obertop H. Centralization of surgery for periampullary malignancy. Br J Surg 1999;86:1361–1362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, Zerbi A, Di CV, Braga M. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:518–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998;228:429–438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005; 242:781–8. discussion.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boudourakis LD, Wang TS, Roman SA, Desai R, Sosa JA. Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship. Ann Surg 2009;250:159–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maa J, Gosnell JE, Gibbs VC, Harris HW. Exporting excellence for Whipple resection to refine the Leapfrog Initiative. J Surg Res 2007;138:189–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Schareck WD, Benz S, Hopt UT. Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 2004;187:201–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Riediger H, Makowiec F, Fischer E, Adam U, Hopt UT. Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1106–1115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD, Senninger N, Becker H, Betzler M, Buhr HJ, Hopt UT. Current Practice Patterns in Pancreatic Surgery: Results of a Multi-institutional Analysis of Seven Large Surgical Departments in Germany With 1454 Pancreatic Head Resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1080–1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keck T, Wellner UF, Riediger H, Adam U, Sick O, Hopt UT, Makowiec F. Long-term outcome after 92 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of Beger and Frey procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:549–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009;250:177–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Wellner U, Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Hopt UT. Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery 2012;152:S95-S102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS. Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4175–4181.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nordback L, Parviainen M, Raty S, Kuivanen H, Sand J. Resection of the head of the pancreas in Finland: effects of hospital and surgeon on short-term and long-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1454–1460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg 2003;138:721–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark W, Hernandez J, McKeon BA, Kahn A, Morton C, Toomey P, Mullinax J, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Surgery residency training programmes have greater impact on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy than hospital volume or surgeon frequency. HPB (Oxford) 2010;12:68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schell MT, Barcia A, Spitzer AL, Harris HW. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system. HPB Surg 2008; 2008:825940

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DiCarlo V, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Villa E. Pancreatic cancer resection in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1998;85:607–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Ord SE, Grochow LB, Abrams RA, Pitt HA. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:207–216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Makowiec.

Additional information

The data of this paper were presented as poster at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (May 2013, Orlando, FL, USA).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riediger, H., Adam, U., Utzolino, S. et al. Perioperative Outcome After Pancreatic Head Resection: a 10-Year Series of a Specialized Surgeon in a University Hospital and a Community Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1434–1440 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2555-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2555-8

Keywords

Navigation