Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planned Delay of Oral Intake After Esophagectomy Reduces the Cervical Anastomotic Leak Rate and Hospital Length of Stay

  • 2013 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Cervical anastomotic leak rates are high after esophagectomy. We examined the effect of a purposeful delay in institution of oral diet after esophagectomy on the leak rate and hospital length of stay. A retrospective analysis of 120 patients submitted to esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was conducted. Eighty-seven resumed diet within 7 days of surgery (early eaters), and 33 had delayed diet until a mean of 12 days after surgery (late eaters). Mean age was 62.3 years; 98 patients were male. One hundred one resections were for cancer, and 49 % of cancer patients received neoadjuvant therapy. The overall leak rate was 17.5 %, and hospital length of stay was 10.9 days. Anastomotic leak rate was 3 % for late eaters versus 23 % for early eaters (OR of 9.57, p = 0.010). Hospital length of stay was 6 days for late eaters versus 11.8 days for early eaters (p < 0.001). Anastomotic leak was significantly associated with increased length of stay (p < 0.001), adding an average of 7.6 days to hospital stay. Respiratory complications (p < 0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.014) were also independent predictors of increased length of stay, but early eater status was not. Delayed resumption of oral diet after esophagectomy significantly reduces cervical anastomotic leak rate and avoids the increased length of stay associated with leak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Wigle DA, Shen KR, Deschamps C. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1154–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, Zhang L, Si M, Lee J, Chang AC, Pickens A, Orringer MB. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:177–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, Sanyal S, Agrawal N, Dash NR, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larburu Etxaniz S, Gonzales Reyna J, Elorza Orúe JL, Asensio Gallego JI, Diez del Val I, Eizaguirre Letamendia E, Mar Medina B. Cervical anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: diagnosis and management. Cir Esp. 2013;91:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee JM, Lee YC. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:1097–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pines G, Buyeviz V, Machlenkin S, Klein Y, Laor A, Kashtan H. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:274–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;257:238–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TC, Hop WC, Wijnhoven BP, de Jonge J. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2011;254:226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:527–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2002;19:92–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer—a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226:169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laterza E, de'Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, Guglielmi A, Tedesco P, Cordiano C. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:1051–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:681–685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aquino JL,Camargo JG, Said MM, Merhi VA, Maclellan KC, Palu BF. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis evaluation with a mechanical device versus manual suture in patients with advanced megaesophagus. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009;36:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:277–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis. Esophagus. 2008;21:422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, Macherey RS, Bartley S, Weyant RJ, Landreneau RJ. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Allen MS, Shen KR, Nichols FC 3rd, Deschamps C, Wigle DA. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37(4):807–13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Addington WR, Stephens RE, Phelipa MM, Widdicombe JG, Ockey RR (2008) Intra-abdominal pressures during voluntary and reflex cough. Cough 4:2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA

    John S. Bolton & William C. Conway

  2. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA

    Abbas E. Abbas

Authors
  1. John S. Bolton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William C. Conway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abbas E. Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Bolton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolton, J.S., Conway, W.C. & Abbas, A.E. Planned Delay of Oral Intake After Esophagectomy Reduces the Cervical Anastomotic Leak Rate and Hospital Length of Stay. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 304–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2322-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2322-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation