Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tumor Infiltration in the Medial Resection Margin Predicts Survival After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Microscopic tumor involvement (R1) in different surgical resection margins after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been debated.

Methods

Clinico-pathological data for 258 patients who underwent PD between 2001 and 2010 were retrieved from a prospective database. The rates of R1 resection in the circumferential resection margin (pancreatic transection, medial, posterior, and anterior surfaces) and their prognostic influence on survival were assessed.

Results

For PDAC, the R1 rate was 57.1 % (48/84) for any margin, 31.0 % (26/84) for anterior surface, 42.9 % (36/84) for posterior surface, 29.8 % (25/84) for medial margin, and 7.1 % (3/84) for pancreatic transection margin. Overall and disease-free survival for R1 resections were significantly worse than those for R0 resection (17.2 vs. 28.7 months, P = 0.007 and 12.3 vs. 21.0 months, P = 0.019, respectively). For individual margins, only medial positivity had a significant impact on survival (13.8 vs. 28.0 months, P < 0.001), as opposed to involvement in the anterior (19.7 vs. 23.3 months, P = 0.187) or posterior margin (17.5 vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.104). Multivariate analysis demonstrated R0 medial margin was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002, HR = 0.381; 95 % CI 0.207–0.701).

Conclusion

The medial surgical resection margin is the most important after PD for PDAC, and an R1 resection here predicts poor survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60: 277-300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M (2011) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 378: 607-620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Nordling S, Pukkala E, Sankila R, Luttges J, et al. (2005) Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut 54: 385-387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, et al. (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1410-1427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghaneh P, Costello E, Neoptolemos JP (2007) Biology and management of pancreatic cancer. Gut 56: 1134-1152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pancreatic Section BSoG (2005) Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas. Gut 54 Suppl 5: v1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fatima J, Schnelldorfer T, Barton J, Wood CM, Wiste HJ, et al. (2010) Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: implications of positive margin on survival. Arch Surg 145: 167-172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang DK, Johns AL, Merrett ND, Gill AJ, Colvin EK, et al. (2009) Margin clearance and outcome in resected pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27: 2855-2862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, et al. (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1199-1210; discussion 1210-1191.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, et al. (2007) Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 246: 52-60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT, Howard TJ, Wiebke EA, et al. (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg 139: 718-725; discussion 725-717.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, et al. (2004) A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 1200-1210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, Ghaneh P, Cunningham D, et al. (2010) Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304: 1073-1081.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verbeke CS (2008) Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer--are we there yet? Histopathology 52: 787-796.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sitzmann JV, Hruban RH, et al. (1995) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 221: 721-731; discussion 731-723.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khalifa MA (2007) Intraoperative assessment of the Whipple resection specimen. J Clin Pathol 60: 975-980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, et al. (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93: 1232-1237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, Reiser C, Herpel E, et al. (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15: 1651-1660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. (2003) Japanese Pancreatic Society: Classification of Pancreatic Cancer. Tokyo: Kanahara Publishing Co.

  20. Hruban RH, Pitman MB, Klimstra DS (2007) Tumors of the pancreas. Atlas of tumor pathology. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

  21. Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, Going JJ, Glen P, et al. (2010) Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 251: 1003-1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt CM, Glant J, Winter JM, Kennard J, Dixon J, et al. (2007) Total pancreatectomy (R0 resection) improves survival over subtotal pancreatectomy in isolated neck margin positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surgery 142: 572-578; discussion 578-580.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hernandez J, Mullinax J, Clark W, Toomey P, Villadolid D, et al. (2009) Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy is not improved by extending resections to achieve negative margins. Ann Surg 250: 76-80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williamson R (1994) The pancreas. In: Keen G, Farndon J, editors. Operative surgery and management. Oxford, England: Butterworth Heinemann.

  25. Sommerville CA, Limongelli P, Pai M, Ahmad R, Stamp G, et al. (2009) Survival analysis after pancreatic resection for ampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma: an analysis of clinicopathological factors. J Surg Oncol 100: 651-656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pathologists TRCo (2010) Standards and Minimum Datasets for Reporting Cancers. Minimum Dataset for the Histopathological Reporting of Pancreatic, Ampulla of Vater and Bile Duct Carcinoma. London, UK.

  27. Verbeke CS, Menon KV (2009) Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 11: 282-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Angst E, Kim-Fuchs C, Kuruvilla YC, Inderbitzin D, Montani M, et al. (2012) How to counter the problem of R1 resection in duodenopancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer? J Gastrointest Surg 16: 673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, et al. (2010) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. Chicago: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J, Zyromski NJ, Schmidt CM, et al. (2006) A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1338-1345; discussion 1345-1336.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nagakawa T, Sanada H, Inagaki M, Sugama J, Ueno K, et al. (2004) Long-term survivors after resection of carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: significance of histologically curative resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11: 402-408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsuchiya R, Noda T, Harada N, Miyamoto T, Tomioka T, et al. (1986) Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg 203: 77-81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Westgaard A, Tafjord S, Farstad IN, Cvancarova M, Eide TJ, et al. (2008) Resectable adenocarcinomas in the pancreatic head: the retroperitoneal resection margin is an independent prognostic factor. BMC Cancer 8: 5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chua TC, Saxena A (2010) Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 14: 1442-1452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Inoue K, Takahashi S (2003) Survival benefits of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 186: 149-153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long R. Jiao.

Additional information

Yaojun Zhang and Adam E. Frampton contributed equally.

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Logistic regression for covariates associated with R1 medial resection margin. PPPD pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. (DOC 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Frampton, A.E., Cohen, P. et al. Tumor Infiltration in the Medial Resection Margin Predicts Survival After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1875–1882 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1985-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1985-4

Keywords

Navigation