Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Surgical Approach on 30-Day Mortality and Morbidity After Elective Colectomy: a NSQIP Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the laparoscopic approach and pre- and postoperative conditions as predictors of 30-day mortality and morbidity in elective colectomy.

Methods

Elective colectomies were identified in the 2005–2008 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model 30-day mortality and morbidity following elective colectomy. Propensity scores were calculated to decrease selection bias.

Results

During the period studied, 14,321 patients underwent open colectomy and 10,409 underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Factors that significantly influenced mortality included male gender [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.9]; age (OR 1.07, CI 1.05–1.08); comorbidities including dyspnea, ascites, congestive heart failure, dialysis, or disseminated cancer; and postoperative conditions including reintubation (OR 2.6, CI 1.6–4.0), renal failure (OR 3.8, CI 2.1–6.9), stroke (OR 6.44, CI 2.4–17.6), and septic shock (OR 13.1, CI 8.76–19.4). While laparoscopy was not independently associated with mortality, it was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity including reintubation (OR 0.74, CI 0.59–0.91), renal failure (OR 0.60, CI 0.4–0.91), septic shock (OR 0.74, CI 0.59–0.92), wound infection (OR 0.58, CI0.44–0.77), and pneumonia (OR 0.71, CI 0.59–0.86).

Conclusions

Based on this analysis, laparoscopy was associated with a decrease in 30-day postoperative morbidity for colectomy. However, after adjusting for preoperative comorbidities and postoperative morbidities, laparoscopy did not independently influence mortality after colectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja J, Goldstein H. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1991;1(3):144–150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rea J, Cone M, Diggs B, Deveney K, Lu K, Herzig D. Utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States before and after the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):281–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, et al. Australian and New Zealand study comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries for colon cancer in adults: Organization and conduct. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(10):840–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: Comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(11):2001–2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–1726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224–2229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop W, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Onc. 2005;6(7):477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP. A national comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy using the national surgical quality improvement project data. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(2):183–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cone M, Diggs B, Dolan J, et al. Dramatic decreases in mortality from laparoscopic colon resections based on data from the nationwide inpatient sample. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):594–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. http://www.acsnsqip.org/main/programspecs/program_case_inclusion_exclusion.jsp. Accessed 14 April 2011.

  12. Newgard CD, Hedges JR, Arthur M, Mullins RJ. Advanced statistics: The propensity score—A method for estimating treatment effect in observational research. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(9):953–961.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, Martin MJ. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: Results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(3):583–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):326–341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest or disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim C. Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cone, M.M., Herzig, D.O., Diggs, B.S. et al. Effect of Surgical Approach on 30-Day Mortality and Morbidity After Elective Colectomy: a NSQIP Study. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1212–1217 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1860-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1860-3

Keywords

Navigation