Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comprehensive Review of Strictureplasty Techniques in Crohn’s Disease: Types, Indications, Comparisons, and Safety

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Crohn’s disease is one of the chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract that is often complicated by stricture formation with resulting obstructive symptoms. The technical repertoire of strictureplasty procedures has increased over the years in an effort to manage the diverse presentations of this condition while limiting the need for bowel resection. In this comprehensive review, we describe, compare, categorize, and appraise the strengths and weaknesses of 15 unique strictureplasty techniques.

Methods

To identify all unique strictureplasty procedures, a Medline search utilizing “Crohn’s disease,” “surgical therapy,” “strictureplasty,” “enteroenterostomy,” “Heineke–Mikulicz,” and “side-to-side isoperistaltic” strictureplasty as medical subject headings was completed. PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were conducted. Relevant articles between 1980 to December 2010 were reviewed. We initially selected 58 articles, but only 18 introduced novel surgical procedures related to 15 types of strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease.

Results

We identified 15 types of strictureplasty techniques. These were categorized into three main groups. The revised nomenclature will facilitate the reader to understand the differences and utility of each technique. These groups include the Heineke–Mikulicz-like strictureplasties, the intermediate procedures, and the enteroenterostomies. Heineke–Mikulicz strictureplasty was the most frequently used technique.

Conclusion

Various techniques of strictureplasty have been reported in the published literature. Strictureplasty has been shown to be a safe and efficacious technique that is comparable to bowel resection for stricturing Crohn’s disease. This technique spares bowel length and puts the Crohn’s disease patient at a lower risk of developing short bowel syndrome with repeated resections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katariya RN, Sood S, et al. Stricture-plasty for tubercular strictures of the gastro-intestinal tract. Br. J. Surg. 1977; 64: 496–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee EC, Papaioannou N. Minimal surgery for chronic obstruction in patients with extensive or universal Crohn’s disease. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Eng. 1982; 64: 229–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milsom JW. Strictureplasty and mechanical dilation in strictured Crohn’s disease. In: Michelassi F, Milsom JW (eds). Operative strategies in inflammatory bowel disease. New York: Springer; 1999:259–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaetini A, DeSimone M, Resegotti A. Our experience with strictureplasty in the surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. Hepato-gastroenterol , 1989; 36: 511–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasaki I, et al. Extended strictureplasty for multiple short skipped strictures of Crohn’s disease. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: 342–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW. Strictureplasty for ileocolic anastomotic strictures in Crohn’s disease. Dis. Colon Rectum. 1993; 36: 1099–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Taschieri AM, et al. Description of new “bowel-sparing” techniques for long strictures of Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Surg. 1997; 173: 509–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sampietro GM, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of nonconventional strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2004; 199: 8–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon PH and Nivatvongs S. Crohn’s disease. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum and anus, 3rd edition. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 1999:856–860.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ. Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease with multiple long strictures. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1993; 36; 71–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Selvaggi F. et al. A new type of strictureplasty for the treatment of multiple long stenosis in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007; 13: 641–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poggioli G. et al. Conservative surgical management of terminal ileitis; side-to-side enterocolic anastomosis. Dis. Colon Rectum. 1997; 40: 234–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tonelli F, Fazi M, Di Martino C. Ileocecal strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: long-term results and comparison with ileocecal resection. World J. Surg. 2010; 34:2860–2866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Michelassi F: Side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty for multiple Crohn’s strictures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 345–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurst RD, Michelassi F. Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: techniques and long-term results. World J. Surg. 1998; 22: 359–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Poggioli G. et al. A new model of strictureplasty for multiple and long stenoses in Crohn’s ileitis: side-to-side diseased to disease-free anastomosis. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. di Abriola FG, De Angelis P, Dall’Oglio L, Di Lorenzo M. Strictureplasty: an alternative approach in long segment bowel stenosis Crohn’s disease. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003; 38: 814–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sasaki I. et al. New reconstructive procedure after intestinal resection for Crohn’s Disease: modified side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis with double Heineke–Mikulicz procedure. Dis. Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 940–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hotokezaka M, Ikeda T, Uchiyama S, Hayakawa S, Tsuchiya K, Chijiiwa K. Side-to-side-to-end strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 1882–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tonelli F et al. Strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease: surgical option. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 920–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Roy and D. Kumar. Strictureplasty: British Journal of Surgery 2004; 91: 1428–1437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laureti S. and Fazio VW. Obstruction in Crohn’s disease: strictureplasty versus resection. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 2000; 3: 191–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jobanputra S. and Weiss E. Strictureplasty. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007; 20: 294–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roy P, Kumar D. Strictureplasty for active Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2006; 21: 427–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tichansky D, Cagir B, Yoo E, Marcus S, Fry R. Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 911–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamamoto T, Fazio V, Tekkis P. Safety and efficacy of strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Dis Col Rectum, 2007; 50: 1968–1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spencer M, Nelson H, Wolff B, Dozois R. Strictureplasty for obstructive Crohn’s disease: the Mayo experience. Mayo Clin Proc, 1994; 69: 33–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, et al. Intestinal surgery for Crohn’s disease: predictors of recovery, quality of life, and costs. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009; 13: 2128–2135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Binion D, Theriot K, Shidham S, et al. Clinical factors contributing to rapid reoperation for Crohn’s disease patients undergoing resection and/or strictureplasty. J Gastrointest Surg, 2007; 11: 1692–1698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Froehlich F, Juillerat P et al. Fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease. Digestion 2007;76: 113–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dietz D, Laureti S, Fazio V et al. Safety and long-term efficacy of strictureplasty in 314 patients with obstructing small bowel Crohn’s disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 192: 330–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baba S and Nakai K. Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease in Japan. J. Gastroenterol, 1995; 30: 135–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fichera A, et al. Patterns and operative treatment of recurrent Crohn’s disease: a prospective longitudinal study. J. Surg. 2006; 140:649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Yamamoto and M. Keighley. Long-term results of strictureplasty without synchronous resection for jejunoileal Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterology 1999; 2: 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Futami K, Arima S. Role of strictureplasty in surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. J. Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 35–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reese G, Purkayastha S, et al. Strictureplasty vs. resection in small bowel Crohn’s disease: an evaluation of short-term outcomes and recurrence. Meta-analysis. Colorectal Disease, 2006; 9: 686–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fernhead N, Chowdhury R, et al. Long-term follow-up of strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease. British Journal of Surgery, 2006; 93: 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Broering D, et al. Quality of life after surgical therapy of small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease. Digestive Surgery, 2001; 18: 124–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dasari B, Maxwell R, Gardiner K. Assessment of complications following strictureplasty for small bowel Crohn’s disease. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2009; 179: 201-205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tonelli F, Fedi M, Paroli M, Fazi M. Indications and results of side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004; 47: 494–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, et al. Long-term efficacy of strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease. Surgery Today, 2010; 40: 949–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Elizabeth Crosby for her help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burt Cagir.

Additional information

This manuscript has not been presented or planned to be presented as a poster or on a podium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambe, R., Campbell, L. & Cagir, B. A Comprehensive Review of Strictureplasty Techniques in Crohn’s Disease: Types, Indications, Comparisons, and Safety. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 209–217 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1651-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1651-2

Keywords

Navigation