Abstract
Introduction
Esophageal cancer is a complex disease that is typically discovered at a late stage and is associated with a poor overall survival rate.
Discussion
Regardless of surgical approach, esophagectomy carries a significant morbidity and mortality. The surgeon should choose the surgical approach based on her comfort level, training and experience. Further investigation is required to evaluate the translatability of minimally invasive esophagectomy on a large scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW et al. N Eng J Med 2002; 347(21): 1662–9
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Omloo JM, Lagrade SM et al. Ann Surg 2007; 246(6):992–1000; discussion 1000–1
Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons. Enestvedt CK, Perry KA, Kim C et al. Dis Esophagus 2010; 23(2): 136–144
Laproscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. DePaula AL, Hashiba K et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995; 5: 1–5
Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes in 222 patients. Luketich JD, Alvelo- Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al. Ann Surg 2003; 238(4): 486–495
Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Nguyen NT, Follette DM et al. Arch Surg 2000;135(8): 920–5
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systemic review of the literature. Verhage RJJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J et al. Minerva Chir 2009; 64(2): 135–146
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A et al. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55(11): 3031.3040
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Biere, SSAY, Cuesta MA, Van Der Peet DL. Minerva Chir 2009;64(2): 121–133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, R., Jobe, B.A. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: What is the Best Approach? Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15, 1503–1505 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1558-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1558-y