Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pancreatoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Very Elderly; Is It Safe and Justified?

  • 2010 SSAT Poster Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The outcomes of complex major surgery in the elderly are being scrutinized because of the demands on surgical services by an aging population and the concern whether such endeavors are justified. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma presents special challenges because of the high morbidity of the procedure, dismal prognosis of the disease, and the increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer with age.

Methods

All patients who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1981 to 2007 were analyzed for perioperative outcomes, tumor-related parameters, use of adjuvant therapy, and long-term survival. Specifically those aged ≥80 years were compared with a control group aged ≤80 years. Continuous variables are displayed as median and interquartile range (IQR); log-rank test and Cox’s proportional hazards were used to determine survival and effect of age as an independent marker against other covariates.

Results

Fifty-three patients aged ≥80 years underwent PD. Twenty-six (51%) developed complications, including delayed gastric emptying (nine, 17%), pancreatic leak (six, 11%), and postoperative bleeding (five, 9%). There was one in-hospital death (2%). The hospital stay was 13.5 days (IQR 9–19). Forty-one (79%) patients were discharged home; of the 11 (21%) patients who went to an outside health care facility (pancreatic leak/drains and feeding issues—five, delayed gastric emptying/nutritional—four, no home support—one), one died in a nursing home at 5 months while the other ten patients returned to their previous abode (median 4 weeks). The median disease-free and overall survivals were 11.8 (IQR 7.8–18.4) and 13.5 months (IQR 12–21.3). Compared to the non-octogenarians (n = 567), the older population had more poor risk patients with respect to ASA status (P < 0.0004), stayed longer as in-patients (P < 0.04), were more likely to develop complications (P < 0.001), and were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in long-term disease-free or overall survival (log-rank P < 0.30 and P < 0.14), and age did not appear to be an independent marker of prognosis when analyzed (Cox’s proportional hazards P < 0.26; chi-square, 1.25).

Conclusions

In experienced institutions, PD for ductal adenocarcinoma is a viable option in the ambulatory octogenarian population who are deemed operative candidates for a PD. The trade off is a greater complication rate and the prospect of discharge (one in five) to a chronic care facility. The majority, however, can be discharged home with a reasonable functional status, and those discharged to temporary health care rehabilitation facilities are likely to make a recovery over a few weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Census Bureau. 2008 National Population Projections. http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/.

  2. US Census Bureau. 1990 Census. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_lang=en&_ts=246063658125&_ds_name=DEC_1990_STF1_&_program=.

  3. Crile G, Jr. The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 130(6):1049–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shapiro TM. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients. Ann Surg 1975; 182(6):715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, et al. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217(5):430–5; discussion 435–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg 2008; 247(3):456–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DiCarlo V, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Villa E. Pancreatic cancer resection in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1998; 85(5):607–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 1995; 222(4):426–34; discussion 434–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 2006; 141(2):137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 1998; 2(3):207–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spencer MP, Sarr MG, Nagorney DM. Radical pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in the elderly. Is it safe and justified? Ann Surg 1990; 212(2):140–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosking MP, Warner MA, Lobdell CM, et al. Outcomes of surgery in patients 90 years of age and older. Jama 1989; 261(13):1909–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang JJ, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, et al. Quality of life and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2000; 231(6):890–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2):293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardacre JM, Simo K, McGee MF, et al. Pancreatic resection in octogenarians. J Surg Res 2009; 156(1):129–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10(3):347–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy is acceptable for periampullary tumors in the elderly, even in patients over 80 years of age. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16(5):675–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen JW, Shyr YM, Su CH, et al. Is pancreaticoduodenectomy justified for septuagenarians and octogenarians? Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50(53):1661–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scurtu R, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, et al. Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10(6):813–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw CM, O'Hanlon DM, McEntee GP. Long-term quality of life following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52(63):927–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Kuhlmann KF, Terwee CB, et al. Quality of life after curative or palliative surgical treatment of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. Br J Surg 2005; 92(4):471–7.

  22. Nguyen TC, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, et al. Standard vs. radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: a prospective, randomized trial evaluating quality of life in pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7(1):1–9; discussion 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schniewind B, Bestmann B, Kurdow R, et al. Bypass surgery versus palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, with an emphasis on quality of life analyses. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(11):1403–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lightner AM, Glasgow RE, Jordan TH, et al. Pancreatic resection in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198(5):697–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205(6):729–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yermilov I, Bentrem D, Sekeris E, et al. Readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas cancer: a population-based appraisal. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16(3):554–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lea MS, Stahlgren LH. Is resection appropriate for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas? A cost-benefit analysis. Am J Surg 1987; 154(6):651–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vickers SM, Kerby JD, Smoot TM, et al. Economics of pancreatoduodenectomy in the elderly. Surgery 1996; 120(4):620–5; discussion 625–6.

  29. Topal B, Peeters G, Vandeweyer H, et al. Hospital cost-categories of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Acta Chir Belg 2007; 107(4):373–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosemurgy AS, Bloomston M, Serafini FM, et al. Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2001; 5(1):21–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ho V, Aloia T. Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care 2008; 46(7):718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pratt WB, Gangavati A, Agarwal K, et al. Establishing standards of quality for elderly patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 2009; 144(10):950–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138(1):8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Saboor Khan, Guido Sclabas, Kaye Reid Lombardo, Michael G. Sarr, David Nagorney, Michael L. Kendrick, John H. Donohue, Florencia G. Que & Michael B. Farnell

  2. Chair Division of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Michael B. Farnell

Authors
  1. Saboor Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guido Sclabas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kaye Reid Lombardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael G. Sarr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Nagorney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael L. Kendrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John H. Donohue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Florencia G. Que
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Michael B. Farnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B. Farnell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, S., Sclabas, G., Lombardo, K.R. et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Very Elderly; Is It Safe and Justified?. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 1826–1831 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1294-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1294-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation