Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simvastatin Improves Wound Strength after Intestinal Anastomosis in the Rat

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Simvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor commonly known as a cholesterol-lowering drug with additional pleiotropic effects. Also, it is demonstrated that it prevents postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rat. This study was designed to assess its effects on the healing process of colonic anastomosis.

Methods

Thirty-two male Wistar albino rats were randomized into two groups and subjected to colonic anastomosis. The study group was treated with simvastatin and the control group received only tap water instead. The rats were killed 3 and 7 days postoperatively. Wound complications, intra-abdominal abscesses, and anastomotic leaks and stenosis were recorded. Four types of assessment were performed: bursting pressure, hydroxyproline content, histopathology, and biochemical analysis.

Results

Compared to the control group, simvastatin-treated rats displayed a higher bursting pressure (p < 0.001) and anastomotic hydroxyproline content (p < 0.05). Simvastatin treatment leads to a significant decrease in malondealdehyde levels (p < 0.05) and increase in paraoxonase activity (p < 0.001) at both time points. Histopathological analysis revealed that simvastatin administration leads to a better anastomotic healing in terms of reepithelialization, decreased granuloma formation, reduced ischemic necrosis, and inflammatory infiltration to muscle layer.

Conclusion

Clinically relevant doses of simvastatin do not have a negative impact on colonic anastomosis but improve intestinal wound healing in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herbey II, Ivankova NV, Katkoori VR, Mamaeva OA. Colorectal cancer and hypercholesterolemia: review of current research. Exp Oncol 2005;27(3):166–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwak B, Mulhaupt F, Myit S, Mach F. Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nat Med 2000;6:1399–1402. doi:10.1038/82219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pruefer D, Makowski J, Schnell M, Buerke U, Dahm M, Oelert H, Sibelius U, Grandel U, Grimminger F, Seeger W, Meyer J, Darius H, Buerke M. Simvastatin inhibits inflammatory properties of Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin. Circulation 2003;15:2104–2110.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merx MW, Liehn EA, Graf J, van de Sandt A, Schaltenbrand M, Schrader J, Hanrath P, Weber C. Statin treatment after onset of sepsis in a murine model improves survival. Circulation 2005;112(1):117–124. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.502195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang YX, Hennessy S, Propert K, Hwang WT, Sarkar M, Lewis JD. Chronic statin therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008;17(9):869–876. doi:10.1002/pds.1599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rugale C, Delbosc S, Mimran A, Jover B. Simvastatin reverses target organ damage and oxidative stress in angiotensin II hypertension: comparison with apocynin, tempol, and hydralazine. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2007;50(3):293–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laws PE, Spark JI, Cowled PA, Fitridge RA. The role of statins in vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;27(1):6–16. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.09.014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PD, Almog R, Bonner JD, Rennert HS, Low M, Greenson JK, Rennert G. Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2184–2192. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmeister M, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H. Individual and joint use of statins and low-dose aspirin and risk of colorectal cancer: a population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 2007;121(6):1325–1330. doi:10.1002/ijc.22796.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92(9):1150–1154. doi:10.1002/bjs.5054.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hulka JF, Omran K, Berger GS. Classification of adnexal adhesions: a proposal and evaluation of its prognostic value. Fertil Steril 1978;41:661–665.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jamall IS, Finelli VN, Que Hee SS. A simple method to determine nanogram levels of 4-hydroxyproline in biological tissues. Anal Biochem 1981;15:70–75. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(81)90261-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunter MIS, Nlemadım BC, Davidson DIW. Lipid peroxidation products and antioxidant proteins in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from multiple sclerosis patients. Neurochem Res 1985;10:1645–52. doi:10.1007/BF00988606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckerson HW, Wyte CM, La Du BN. The human serum paraoxanase/arylesterase polymorphism. Hum Genet 1983;35:1126–1138.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiu CJ, McArdle AH, Brown R et al. Intestinal mucosal lesion in low-flow states. I. A morphological, hemodynamic, and metabolic reappraisal. Arch Surg 1970;101:478–483.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Houdart R, Lavergne A, Galian A et al. Evolution anatomo-pathologique des anastomoses digestives bord a bord en un plan. Etude de 210 anastomoses coliques chez le rat de 2e and 180e jour. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1983;7:465–473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutschenreiter G, Haina D, Paulini K et al. Wundheilung nach laser und rotlichtbestralung. Z Exp Chir 1980;13:75–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia JC, Arias C, Garcı’a C et al. Modificacio’n de los mediadores inflamatorios en isquemia–reperfusio’n intestinal en unmodelo de diabetes tipo II. Cir Esp 2002;71:276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:255–259. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133186.81222.08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonovas S, Filioussi K, Flordellis CS, Sitaras NM. Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 18 studies involving more than 1.5 million patients. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(23):3462–3468. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coogan PF, Smith J, Rosenberg L. Statin use and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99(1):32–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adah F, Benghuzzi H, Tucci M, Russell G, England B. Cholesterol production inhibitor (statin) increased bone healing in surgically created femoral defect in an animal model. Biomed Sci Instrum 2007;43:95–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Serin-Kilicoglu S, Erdemli E. New addition to the statin’s effect. J Trauma 2007;63(1):187–191. doi:10.1097/01.TA.0000240974.07999.bc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kureishi Y, Luo Z, Shiojima I, Bialik A, Fulton D, Lefer DJ et al. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin activates the protein kinase Akt and promotes angiogenesis in normocholesterolemic animals. Nat Med 2000;6:1004–1010. doi:10.1038/79510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weis M, Heeschen C, Glassford AJ, Cooke JP. Statins have biphasic effects on angiogenesis. Circulation 2002;105:739–745. doi:10.1161/hc0602.103393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Demierre MF, Higgins PD, Gruber SB, Hawk E, Lippman SM. Statins and cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5(12):930–942. doi:10.1038/nrc1751.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Park KW, Hwang KK, Cho HJ, Hur J, Yang HM, Yoon CH, Kang HJ, Oh BH, Park YB, Kim HS. Simvastatin enhances endothelial differentiation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in hypercholesterolemic patients and induces pro-angiogenic cytokine IL-8 secretion from monocytes. Clin Chim Acta 2008;388(1–2):156–166. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2007.10.027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Takenaka M, Hirade K, Tanabe K, Akamatsu S, Dohi S, Matsuno H, Kozawa O. Simvastatin stimulates VEGF release via p44/p42 MAP kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;301(1):198–203. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(02)03014-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:549–573. doi:10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70568-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cowled PA, Khanna A, Laws PE, Field JB, Varelias A, Fitridge RA. Statins inhibit neutrophil infiltration in skeletal muscle reperfusion injury. J Surg Res 2007;141(2):267–276. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shao H, Shen Y, Liu H, Dong G, Qiang J, Jing H. Simvastatin suppresses lung inflammatory response in a rat cardiopulmonary bypass model. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84(6):2011–2018. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Syk I, Ågren MS, Adawi D et al. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases enhances breaking strength of colonic anastomoses in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2001;88:228–234. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01649.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. de Hingh IH, Siemonsma MA, de Man BM et al. The matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BB-94 improves the strength of intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002;17:348–354. doi:10.1007/s00384-002-0418-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferri N, Colombo G, Ferrandi C, Raines EW, Levkau B, Corsini A. Simvastatin reduces MMP1 expression in human smooth muscle cells cultured on polymerized collagen by inhibiting Rac1 activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27(5):1043. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.139881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nomura S, Yoshimura K, Akiyama N, Mikamo A, Furutani A, Aoki H, Matsuzaki M, Hamano K. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors reduce matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in human varicose veins. Eur Surg Res 2005;37(6):370–378. doi:10.1159/000090339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Turner NA, O’Regan DJ, Ball SG et al. Simvastatin inhibitsMMP-9 secretion from human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the RhoA/ROCK pathway and reducing MMP-9 mRNA levels. FASEB J 2005;19:804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun XF, Wang LL, Wang JK, Yang J, Zhao H, Wu BY, Wang YF, Wang L. Effects of simvastatin on lung injury induced by ischaemia–reperfusion of the hind limbs in rats. J Int Med Res 2007;35(4):523–533.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Aarons CB, Cohen PA, Gower A, Reed KL, Leeman SE, Stucchi AF, Becker JM. Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) decrease postoperative adhesions by increasing peritoneal fibrinolytic activity. Ann Surg 2007;245(2):176–184. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000236627.07927.7c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Karadeniz Cakmak.

Additional information

Oral presentation at the “Turkish National Surgery Congress”, Antalya, Turkey, May 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karadeniz Cakmak, G., Irkorucu, O., Ucan, B.H. et al. Simvastatin Improves Wound Strength after Intestinal Anastomosis in the Rat. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 1707–1716 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0951-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0951-2

Keywords

Navigation