Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Conservative Management of Acute Appendicitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

This article was retracted on 26 October 2011

Abstract

Background

The acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency, and the primary treatment has been appendicectomy. Antibiotics are started preoperatively and continued postoperatively as needed.

Methods

This prospective study was carried out at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir, India to determine the role of antibiotics as the only treatment in acute appendicitis and the analgesic consumption needed. Total of 80 patients were included in the study with a duration of abdominal pain less than 72 h. Out of 80 patients, 40 patients received antibiotics intravenously for 2 days followed by oral treatment for 7 days, while another 40 patients considered as controls were randomized to surgery.

Results

Patients managed conservatively were discharged within 3 days except for two—patients who required surgery after 12 and 24 h, respectively, because of peritonitis due to perforated appendicitis. Four patients were readmitted within 1 year as a result of recurrent appendicitis and had to undergo surgery when appendicitis was confirmed. The diagnostic accuracy within the operated group was 90%. Two patients had perforated appendicitis at operation.

Conclusion

Our conclusion is that antibiotic treatment in the patients with acute appendicitis is quite effective, and these patients may not need surgery. The patients managed conservatively with antibiotics alone experience less pain and require less analgesia but have high recurrent rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McBurney C. Experiences with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. N Y Med J 1889;50:1676–1684.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coldrey E. Five years of conservative treatment of acute appendicitis. J Int Coll Surg 1959;32:255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous. Combined traditional Chinese and western medicine in acute appendicitis. Chin Med J 1977;3:266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Surana R, Quinn F, Puri P. Is it necessary to perform appendectomy in the middle of the night in children. BMJ 1993;306:1168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambjommson E. Management of appendiceal abscess. Curr Surg 1984;41:4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bagi P, Oueholm S. Non-operative management of the ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass. Surgery. 1987;101:602–605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engkvist O. Appendectomy a froid: a superfluous routine operation? Acta Chir Scand 1971;137:797–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McPherson AG, Kinmoth JB. Acute appendicitis and the appendix mass. Br J Surg. 1945;32:365–70. doi:10.1002/bjs.18003212705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas DR. Conservative management of the appendix mass. Surgery 1973;73:677–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. EACS. Acute appendicitis—Operative versus conservative management: EACS guidelines for endoscopic surgery. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006, pp 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mosegaard A, Nielsen OS. Interval appendectomy: A retrospective study. Acta Chir Scand 1979;145:109–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams ML. The medical management of acute appendicitis in a non-surgical environment: a retrospective case review. Mil Med. 1990;155:345–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurin NN, Slobodchuk IUS, Gavrilov IUF. The efficacy of the conservative treatment of patients with acute appendicitis on board ships at sea. Vestn Khir 1992;148:144–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eriksson S, Granstrom L. Randomized controlled trial of appendectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitus. Br J Surg. 1995;82:166–169. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800820207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Malik AA, Wani NA. Continuing diagnostic challenge of acute appendicitis-evaluation through modified Alvarado score. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;68:504–505. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04811.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Bark S. Laboratory tests in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand 1989;155:11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Granstrom L, Erikson S, Tisell A. Ultrasonography as a tool in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A prospective study. Surg Res Commun 1992;11:309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Puylaert JBCM. Acute appendicitis US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158:355–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2(7889):1127–1131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG, Hart MJ. A prospective trail of computed tomography and ultra sonagraphy for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patients. Am J Surg 2001;182(3):305–306. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00645-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oeutsch AA, Shani N, Reiss R. Are some appendicectomies unnecessary? An analysis of 319 white appendices. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1983;28:35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pieper R, Kager L, Nasman P. Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand 1982;148:51–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:418–419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnbjornsson E. Small intestinal obstruction after appendectomy: an avoidable complication? Curr Surg 1984;41:354–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Raf LE. Causes of abdominal adhesions in cases of intestinal obstruction. Acta Chir Scand 1969;135:73–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grosfeld JL, Weinberger M, Clatworthy HW Jr. Vascularized appendical transplants in biliary and urinary tract replacement. J Pediatr Surg 1971;6:630–638. doi:10.1016/0022-3468(71)90389-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. WeinJberg RW. Appendix ureteroplasty. Br J Urol 1976;48:234.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Tisell A. Ultrasonography in suspected acute appendicitis. Is it difficult to learn. Br J Surg 1993;80(suppl):4. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800800104.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh JK et al. Imaging of acute abdomen and pelvis: Acute appendicitis and beyond. Radiographies 2007;27:1419–1431. doi:10.1148/rg.275065021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Athey PA, Hacken JB, Estrada R. Sonographic appearance of mucocele of the appendix. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984;12:333–337. doi:10.1002/jcu.1870120604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Simpson J, Scholefield J. Acute appendicitis. The Foundation Years 2006;2(2):72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roggo A, Wood WC, Ottinger LW. Carcinoid tumours of the appendix. Ann Surg 1993;217:385–90. doi:10.1097/00000658-199304000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shams-ul Bari.

Additional information

This article has been retracted because significant portions were previously published.

An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1676-6

About this article

Cite this article

Malik, A.A., Bari, Su. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Conservative Management of Acute Appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 966–970 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0835-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0835-5

Keywords

Navigation