Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Positron Emission Tomography in Surgery Follow-Up of Esophageal Cancer

  • original article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Although the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer has been improved by extended dissection, the incidence of recurrence still remains high. In esophageal cancer, positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) already demonstrated to be useful for initial staging and monitoring response to therapy. This prospective study compared the ability of FDG-PET and conventional imaging to detect early recurrence of esophageal cancer after initial surgery in asymptomatic patients.

Materials and Methods

Between October 2003 and September 2006, 41 patients with esophageal cancer were included in a prospective study after initial radical esophagectomy. FDG-PET, thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT), abdominal ultrasonography, and endoscopy were performed every 6 months after initial treatment.

Results and Discussion

Twenty-three patients had recurrent disease (56%), mostly within the first 6 months after surgery (70%). Despite two false-positive scans due to postoperative changes, FDG-PET was more accurate than CT (91% vs. 81%, p = 0.02) for the detection of recurrence with a sensitivity of 100% (vs. 65%), a specificity of 85% (vs. 91%), and a negative predictive value of 100% on a patient-by-patient-based analysis. For the detection of locoregional recurrence, FDG-PET was more accurate than CT (96.2% vs. 88.9%). FDG-PET was also more accurate than CT for the detection of distant metastases (92.5% vs. 84.9%), especially when involving either bones (100%) or liver (98.1%). A lower sensitivity of FDG-PET (57%) for the early detection of small lung metastases did not affect patient management (accuracy = 92.5%).

Conclusion

FDG-PET appears to be very useful for the systematic follow-up of asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy with an initial scan performed 6 months after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Walz MK, Seeber S, Klump B, Budach W, Teichmann R, Schmitt M, Schmitt G, Franke C, Wilke H. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2310–2317. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, Milan C, Mariette C, Conroy T, Pezet D, Roullet B, Seitz JF, Herr JP, Paillot B, Arveux P, Bonnetain F, Binquet C. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1160–1168. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleinberg L, Forastiere AA. Chemoradiation in the management of esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4110–4117. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, Foo K, Zalcberg J, Simes J. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:226–234. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70039-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Triboulet JP, Mariette C. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma stade III. State of surgery after radiochemotherapy (RCT). Cancer Radiother 2006;10:456–461. doi:10.1016/j.canrad.2006.08.002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baba M, Aikou T, Yoshinaka H, Natsugoe S, Fukumoto T, Shimazu H, Akazawa K. Long-term results of subtotal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994;219:310–316. doi:10.1097/00000658-199403000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994;220:364–372. doi:10.1097/00000658-199409000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Nishi M. Localization of recurrent disease after extended lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Am Coll Surg 1996;182:340–346.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhansali MS, Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Ono T, Hikita S, Toh Y, Fujii T, Tou U, Shirouzu K. Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus. World J Surg 1997;21:275–281. doi:10.1007/s002689900228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection. J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:143–148. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00349-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mariette C, Balon JM, Piessen G, Fabre S, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP. Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease. Cancer 2003;97:1616–1623. doi:10.1002/cncr.11228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita H, Nakagawa K, Tago M, Nakamura N, Shiraishi K, Ohtomo K. Salvage radiotherapy for postoperative loco-regional recurrence of esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2005;18:215–220. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2005.00502.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Komatsu S, Shioaki Y, Ichikawa D, Hamashima T, Kan K, Ueshima Y, Koide K, Lee CJ, Ikeda E, Mutoh F, Kurioka H, Oka T, Yamagishi H. Survival and clinical evaluation of salvage operation for cervical lymph node recurrence in esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52:796–799.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kubota K, Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Yamaguchi H, Nakanishi Y, Iinuma G. Surgical therapy for recurrent esophageal cancers at anastomoses after esophagectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:1364–1367.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Natsugoe S, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, Uchikado Y, Setoyama T, Uenosono Y, Ishigami S, Owaki T, Aikou T. The role of salvage surgery for recurrence of esophageal squamous cell cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:544–547. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2006.02.014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Homs M, v d Gaast A, Siersema P, Steyerberg E, Kuipers E. Chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;18:CD004063H.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vidal O, Soriano-Izquierdo A, Pera M, Elizalde J, Palacin A, Castells A, Pique J, Volant A, Metges J. Positive VEGF immunostaining independently predicts poor prognosis in curatively resected gastric cancer patients: results of a study assessing a panel of angiogenic markers. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1005–1014. doi:10.1007/s11605-007-0336-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Atmani A, Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Louzi A, Ferrand L, Lozac’h P. Metachronous cancer of gastroplasty after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2006;19:512–515. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00623.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E, De Wever W, Peeters M, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Bormans G, Hiele M, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D, Coosemans W, Ectors N, Haustermans K, Mortelmans L. Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3202–3210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heeren PA, Jager PL, Bongaerts F, van Dullemen H, Sluiter W, Plukker JT. Detection of distant metastases in esophageal cancer with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2004;45:980–987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kole AC, Plukker JT, Nieweg OE, Vaalburg W. Positron emission tomography for staging of oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy. Br J Cancer 1998;78:521–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ohja B, Bartolucci AA, Eloubeidi MA. The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1232–1241. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brucher BL, Weber W, Bauer M, Fink U, Avril N, Stein HJ, Werner M, Zimmerman F, Siewert JR, Schwaiger M. Neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: response evaluation by positron emission tomography. Ann Surg 2001;233:300–309. doi:10.1097/00000658-200103000-00002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ, Weber WA, Becker K, Stein HJ, Lorenzen S, Schuster T, Wieder H, Herrmann K, Bredenkamp R, Hofler H, Fink U, Peschel C, Schwaiger M, Siewert JR. PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:797–805. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70244-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weber WA, Ott K, Becker K, Dittler HJ, Helmberger H, Avril NE, Meisetschlager G, Busch R, Siewert JR, Schwaiger M, Fink U. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3058–3065.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheze-Le Rest C, Metges JP, Teyton P, Jestin-Le Tallec V, Lozac’h P, Volant A, Visvikis D. Prognostic value of initial fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in esophageal cancer: a prospective study. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:628–635.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schoder H, Patel SG, Gonen M, Wolden S, Pfister DG, Shah JP, Larson SM, Kraus DH. Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4199–4208. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.02.590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Brice P, Rain JD, Belhadj K, Gaulard P, Garderet L, Lepage E, Reyes F, Meignan M. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood 2005;106:1376–1381. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-01-0272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hellwig D, Groschel A, Graeter TP, Hellwig AP, Nestle U, Schafers HJ, Sybrecht GW, Kirsch CM. Diagnostic performance and prognostic impact of FDG-PET in suspected recurrence of surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:13–21. doi:10.1007/s00259-005-1919-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H, Erasmus J, Allen P, Forster K, Putnam JB, Herbst RS, Moran CA, Podoloff DA, Roth JA, Cox JD. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1136–1143. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.06.129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E, Cambier JP, Maes A, De Wever W, Peeters M, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D, Mortelmans L. The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:1085–1092. doi:10.1067/mtc.2000.110464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kato H, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, Fukuchi M, Manda R, Kuwano H. Value of positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2004;91:1004–1009. doi:10.1002/bjs.4595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Surti S, Karp JS. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1040–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Visvikis D, Turzo A, Gouret S, Damien P, Lamare F, Bizais Y, Cheze-Le Rest C. Characterisation of SUV accuracy in FDG PET using 3D RAMLA and the Philips Allegro PET scanner. J Nucl Med 2004;45:103P.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Greene F, Page D, Flemming I. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Beck JR. Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:685–686.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaplan E, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81. doi:10.2307/2281868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tepper J, Krasna M, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed C, Goldberg R, Rich T, Kiel K, Mayer R. Superiority of trimodality therapy to surgery alone in esophageal cancer: results of CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nakagawa S, Kanda T, Kosugi S, Ohashi M, Suzuki T, Hatakeyama K. Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:205–211. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen G, Wang Z, Liu XY, Liu FY. Recurrence patterns of esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy—a report of 196 cases. Ai Zheng 2006;25:96–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rouvelas I, Zeng W, Lindblad M, Viklund P, Ye W, Lagergren J. Survival after surgery for oesophageal cancer: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:864–870. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70347-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Raoul JL, Le Prise E, Meunier B, Julienne V, Etienne PL, Gosselin M, Launois B. Combined radiochemotherapy for postoperative recurrence of oesophageal cancer. Gut 1995;37:174–176. doi:10.1136/gut.37.2.174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Luketich JD, Friedman DM, Weigel TL, Meehan MA, Keenan RJ, Townsend DW, Meltzer CC. Evaluation of distant metastases in esophageal cancer: 100 consecutive positron emission tomography scans. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1133–1136. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00974-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Cheze Le Rest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teyton, P., Metges, J.P., Atmani, A. et al. Use of Positron Emission Tomography in Surgery Follow-Up of Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 451–458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0749-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0749-7

Keywords

Navigation