Skip to main content
Log in

Aviation

  • ssat other
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

An increased awareness of the need for safety in medicine in general and in surgery in particular has prompted comparisons between the cockpit and the operating room. These comparisons seem to make sense but tend to be oversimplified.

Discussion

Attempts in healthcare to mimic programs that have been credited for the safety of commercial aviation have met with varying results. The risk here is that oversimplified application of an aviation model may result in the abandonment of good ideas in medicine. This paper describes in more depth the differences between medicine and commercial aviation: from the hiring process, through initial operating experience, recurrent training, and the management of emergencies. These programs add up to a cultural difference. Aviation assumes that personnel are subject to mistake making and that systems and culture need to be constructed to catch and mitigate error; medicine is still focused on the perfection of each individual’s performance. The implications of these differences are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JCAHO National Patient Safety Goal compliance trends—hospital. January 1, 2003–September 30, 2007.

  2. France D, Leming-Lee S, Jackson T, Feistritzer N, Higgins M. An observational analysis of surgical team compliance with perioperative safety practices after crew resource management training. Am J Surg 2008;195(4):546–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reason J. Human error: models and management. Br Med J 2000;320(7237):768–770. March 18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson D, Reid K. Fatigue, alcohol and performance impairment. Nature 2000;320(7237):768–770. March 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karl RC. Staying safe: simple tools for safe surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 2007;92(4):16–22. Apr.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard C. Karl.

Additional information

This paper was originally presented as part of the SSAT Education Committee Panel on Teaching Safety in the OR at the SSAT 49th Annual Meeting, May 2008, in San Diego, California. The other articles presented in the panel were Jones DB, Teaching Safety in the OR; Greenberg CC, Learning from Adverse Events and Near Misses; Sudan DL, Safety in the OR: Who’s In and Who’s Out?; and Moorman DW, Building Better Teams in Surgery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karl, R.C. Aviation. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 6–8 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0692-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0692-7

Keywords

Navigation