Abstract
Introduction
Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was initiated in 1980 as a weight loss operation that restricted oral intake.
Objective
The aim of our study was to determine the results of patients who presented with complications of the VBG and wanted reversal of the VBG, not a conversion to another gastric weight loss operation.
Material and Methods
From 1993 to 2008, 27 patients had reversal of a VBG. Of the patients, 85% were female and presented on average 13 years (range 2–27 years) after the VBG. Presenting symptoms included nausea/vomiting in 88%, reflux in 65%, stricture requiring endoscopic dilatation in 38%, while 7% of patients had upper gastrointestinal bleeding or required total parenteral nutrition. Patients were offered conversion to another weight loss operation but decided on reversal of the VBG alone. All reversals were performed in a similar manner by placing a linear stapler through a gastrotomy resulting in division of the polypropylene mesh band, and reversal of the VBG pouch.
Results
No patients died from the procedure and morbidity included one wound infection and one wound seroma. Preoperative Visick score decreased significantly after reversal, while reflux symptoms resolved in 93% of patients.
Conclusion
We conclude that reversal of a VBG results in symptomatic relief in the majority of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- VBG:
-
Vertical banded gastroplasty
References
Mason E. Morbid obesity: use of vertical banded gastroplasty. Surg Clin North Am 1987;3:521–36.
Mason E, Maher JW, Scott DH, Rodriguez EM, Doherty C. Ten years of vertical banded gastroplasty for severe obesity. Probl Gen Surg 1992;9:280–9.
Balsiger B, Poggio JL, Mai J, Kelly KA, Sarr MG. Ten and more years after vertical banded gastroplasty as primary operation for morbid obesity. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:598–605. doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80108-0.
Kalfarentzos F, Skroubis G, Kehagias I, Mead N, Vagenas K. Weight loss following vertical banded gastroplasty: intermediate results of a prospective study. Obes Surg 2001;11:265–70. doi:10.1381/09608920160558588.
Baltasar A, Bou R, Atlandis F, Martinez R, Serra C, Bengochea M, et al. Vertical banded gastroplasty at more than 5 years. Obes Surg 1998;8:29–34. doi:10.1381/096089298765555015.
van Gemert WG, van Wersch MD, Greve JWM, Soeters PB. Revisional surgery after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass. Obes Surg 1998;8:21–8. doi:10.1381/096089298765555006.
Balsiger B, Murr MM, Mai J, Sarr MG. Gastroesophageal reflux after intact vertical banded gastroplasty: correction by conversion to roux-en-y gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:276–81. doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80076-1.
Visick A. Study of failures after gastrectomy; Hunterian lecture. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1948;3:266–94.
Mon R, Cullen JJ. Standard roux-en-y gastrojejunostomy vs “uncut” roux-en-y gastrojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:298–303. doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80079-7.
Hunter RA, Watts JM, Dunstan RE, Elmslie R, O’Brien P, Slavotinek A, et al. Revisional surgery for failed gastric restrictive procedures for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 1992;2:245–52. doi:10.1381/096089292765560123.
Jobe BA, Horvath KD, Swanstrom LL. Postoperative function following laparoscopic Collis gastroplasty for shortened esophagus. Arch Surg 1998;133:867–74. doi:10.1001/archsurg.133.8.867.
Nightengale ML, Sarr MG, Kelly KA, Jensen MD, Zinsmeister AR, Palumbo PJ. A prospective evaluation of vertical banded gastroplasty as the primary operation for morbid obesity. Mayo Clin Proc 1991;66:773–82.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Edward Mason for his helpful comments and review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thoreson, R., Cullen, J.J. Indications and Results of Reversal of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (VBG). J Gastrointest Surg 12, 2032–2036 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0658-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0658-9