Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Patients with Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Is It Cost-Effective in the Current Era?

  • ahpba annual meeting
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

For patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, diagnostic laparoscopy may identify liver and peritoneal metastases that are difficult to detect with other staging modalities. The aim of this study was to utilize a population-based pancreatic cancer database to assess the cost effectiveness of preoperative laparoscopy.

Material and Methods

Data from a state cancer registry were linked with primary medical record data for years 1996–2003. De-identified patient records were reviewed to determine the role and findings of laparoscopic exploration. Average hospital and physician charges for laparotomy, biliary bypass, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopy were determined by review of billing data from our institution and Medicare data for fiscal years 2005–2006. Cost-effectiveness was determined by comparing three methods of utilization of laparoscopy: (1) routine (all patients), (2) case-specific, and (3) no utilization.

Results and Discussion

Of 298 potentially resectable patients, 86 underwent laparoscopy. The prevalence of unresectable disease was 14.1% diagnosed at either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The mean charge per patient for routine, case-specific, and no utilization of laparoscopy was $91,805, $90,888, and $93,134, respectively.

Conclusion

Cost analysis indicates that the case-specific or routine use of laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer does not add significantly to the overall expense of treatment and supports the use of laparoscopy in patients with known or suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registries; 2006.

  2. Du W, Touchette D, Vaitkevicius VK et al. Cost analysis of pancreatic carcinoma treatment. Cancer 2000;89(9):1917–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang S, Long SR, Kutikova L et al. Burden of pancreatic cancer and disease progression: economic analysis in the US. Oncology 2006;70(1):71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):621–33, discussion 633–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beger HG, Rau B, Gansauge F et al. Treatment of pancreatic cancer: challenge of the facts. World J Surg. 2003;27(10):1075–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yovino S, Darwin P, Daly B et al. Predicting unresectability in pancreatic cancer patients: the additive effects of CT and endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(1):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Menack MJ, Spitz JD, Arregui ME. Staging of pancreatic and ampullary cancers for resectability using laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(10):1129–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW et al. Impact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 2000;135(4):409–14, discussion 414–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hochwald SN, Weiser MR, Colleoni R et al. Laparoscopy predicts metastatic disease and spares laparotomy in selected patients with pancreatic nonfunctioning islet cell tumors. Ann Surg. Oncol 2001;8(3):249–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Friess H, Kleeff J, Silva JC et al. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(6):675–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pisters PW, Lee JE, Vauthey JN et al. Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88(3):325–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. AMA. Current procedural terminology. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. AMA. International Cclassification of diseases-9. 9th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. CMS. Diagnosis related group definitions manual. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2005.

  15. CMS. Physician fee schedule search. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2006.

  16. Reddy KR, Levi J, Livingstone A et al. Experience with staging laparoscopy in pancreatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49(4 Pt 1):498–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karachristos A, Scarmeas N, Hoffman JP. CA 19-9 levels predict results of staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(9):1286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Conlon KC, Dougherty E, Klimstra DS et al. The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg. 1996;223(2):134–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Espat NJ, Brennan MF, Conlon KC. Patients with laparoscopically staged unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma do not require subsequent surgical biliary or gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188(6):649–55, discussion 655–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu RC, Traverso LW. Diagnostic laparoscopy improves staging of pancreatic cancer deemed locally unresectable by computed tomography. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):638–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vollmer CM, Drebin JA, Middleton WD et al. Utility of staging laparoscopy in subsets of peripancreatic and biliary malignancies. Ann Surg. 2002;235(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andren-Sandberg A, Lindberg CG, Lundstedt C, Ihse I. Computed tomography and laparoscopy in the assessment of the patient with pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(1):35–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stefanidis D, Grove KD, Schwesinger WH, Thomas CR Jr. The current role of staging laparoscopy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a review. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(2):189–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tierney WM, Fendrick AM, Hirth RA, Scheiman JM. The clinical and economic impact of alternative staging strategies for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(7):1708–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Canales MG, Macario A, Krummel T. The surgical suite meets the new health economy. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(6):768–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, Helton WS. A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1996;171(5):533–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dorsey JH, Holtz PM, Griffiths RI et al. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(7):476–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luks FI, Logan J, Breuer CK et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(9):965–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Charles Vollmer for his generous assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. G. Billingsley.

Additional information

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Oregon Health and Science University and the Research Committee at the Oregon State Cancer Registry.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 A-CPT and ICD-9 Codes (Not Intended for Inclusion in Published Manuscript Unless Requested by Reviewers)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enestvedt, C.K., Mayo, S.C., Diggs, B.S. et al. Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Patients with Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Is It Cost-Effective in the Current Era?. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 1177–1184 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0514-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0514-y

Keywords

Navigation