Skip to main content
Log in

Complications of PTFE Mesh at the Diaphragmatic Hiatus

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Paraesophageal hernia repair has been associated with a recurrence rate of up to 42%. Thus, in the last decade, there has been increasing interest in the use of mesh reinforcement of the hiatal repair. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is one of the materials that have been used for this purpose, as it is thought to induce minimal tissue reaction. We report two cases in which complications specific to the use of PTFE mesh in this location developed over time. In the first patient, a gastrectomy was required to remove a large PTFE mesh which had eroded into the esophagogastric junction and gastric cardia. The second patient experienced severe dysphagia resulting from a stricture caused by the implant, requiring removal of the mesh. Although such complications have only rarely been reported, the severity and consequences of these incidents, as reported in the literature and in light of our observations, suggest that an alternative to PTFE should be considered for crural reinforcement during paraesophageal hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  1. Pitcher DE, Curet MJ, Martin DT, et al. Successful laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Arch Surg 1995;130(6):590–596.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Casabella F, Sinanan M, Horgan S, Pellegrini CA. Systematic use of gastric fundoplication in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias. Am J Surg 1996;171(5):485–489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190(5):553–560; discussion 560–561.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias: results of 3,019 operations from five diverse surgical sources. Am Surg 1992;58(4):255–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Awad ZT, Puri V, LeBlanc K, et al. Mechanisms of ventral hernia recurrence after mesh repair and a new proposed classification. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201(1):132–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson JM, Carbonell AM, Carmody BJ, et al. Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature. Surg Endosc 2006;20(3):362–366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Targarona EM, Bendahan G, Balague C, et al. Mesh in the hiatus: a controversial issue. Arch Surg 2004;139(12):1286–1296; discussion 1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trus TL, Bax T, Richardson WS, et al. Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 1997;1(3):221–227; discussion 228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coluccio G, Ponzio S, Ambu V, et al. Dislocation into the cardial lumen of a PTFE prosthesis used in the treatment of voluminous hiatal sliding hernia, a case report. Minerva Chir 2000;55(5):341–345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Champion JK, Rock D. Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 2003;17(4):551–553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Pollinger HS, et al. Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res 2003;114(2):126–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Carbonell AM, et al. Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh. J Surg Res 2005;123(2):227–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemppainen E, Kiviluoto T. Fatal cardiac tamponade after emergency tension-free repair of a large paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 2000;14(6):593.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hergueta-Delgado P, Marin-Moreno M, Morales-Conde S, et al. Transmural migration of a prosthetic mesh after surgery of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64(1):120; discussion 121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlson MA, Condon RE, Ludwig KA, Schulte WJ. Management of intrathoracic stomach with polypropylene mesh prosthesis reinforced transabdominal hiatus hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187(3):227–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Edelman DS. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5(1):32–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Peet DL, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Alonso Poza A, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of large paraesophageal hernias: both excision of the sac and gastropexy are imperative for adequate surgical treatment. Surg Endosc 2000;14(11):1015–1018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005;140(1):40–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002;137(6):649–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Novitsky YW, Harrell AG, Cristiano JA, et al. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit. J Surg Res 2007;140(1):6–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Benjamin SB, Kerr R, Cohen D, et al. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Ann Intern Med 1984;100(4):570–575.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lilly MP, Slafsky SF, Thompson WR. Intraluminal erosion and migration of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Arch Surg 1984;119(7):849–853.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kauten JR, Mansour KA. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux. Am Surg 1986;52(4):208–213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Purkiss SF, Argano VA, Kuo J, Lewis CT. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis: surgical management using fundoplication. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(9):517–518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, McLaughlin RH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia. Am J Surg 1998;176(6):659–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gajbhiye R, Quraishi AH, Mahajan P, Warhadpande M. Dysphagia due to transmural migration of polypropylene mesh into esophagus. Indian J Gastroenterol 2005;24(5):226–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R. Impact of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure on esophageal body motility: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2006;141(7):625–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Varga G, Cseke L, Kalmar K, Horvath OP. Prevention of recurrence by reinforcement of hiatal closure using ligamentum teres in laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2004;18(7):1051–1053.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, Pellegrini CA. The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique. Am J Surg 2003;186(1):4–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, et al. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006;244(4):481–490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger P. Tatum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tatum, R.P., Shalhub, S., Oelschlager, B.K. et al. Complications of PTFE Mesh at the Diaphragmatic Hiatus. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 953–957 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0316-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0316-7

Keywords

Navigation