Skip to main content
Log in

The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) often requires a long fluoroscopic time and protection from scatter radiation. This study reports on scatter radiation levels during CRT, with and without additional shielding, and using standard or low pulse rate fluoroscopy.

Materials and methods

Additional lead-shielding drape (0.35-mm lead equivalent) was used on the left side of the table and pulsed fluoroscopy was performed at rates of 10 pulses/s (usual rate) and 7.5 pulses/s (low pulse rate). Fluoroscopy scatter radiation was measured for both pulse rates using an acrylic phantom with a radiation survey meter, both with and without the additional lead-shielding drape.

Results

With the additional lead-shielding drape, the fluoroscopy scatter radiation was reduced by 74.3% at 10 pulses/s and 78.6% at 7.5 pulses/s. If the fluoroscopy was changed from 10 pulses/s to 7.5 pulses/s, the scattered radiation at the primary physician’s position was reduced by 24.0%. The combined use of additional shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy reduced scatter radiation by over 80%.

Conclusion

Additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy are effective in reducing the scattered radiation dose to physicians and nurses during CRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wells G, Parkash R, Healey JS, Talajic M, Arnold JM, Sullivan S, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ. 2011;183:421–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Haga Y, Chida K, Kaga Y, Sota M, Meguro T, Zuguchi M. Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures. Sci Rep. 2017;7:569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brambilla M, Occhetta E, Ronconi M, Plebani L, Carriero A, Marino P. Reducing operator radiation exposure during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2010;12:1769–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Butter C, Schau T, Meyhoefer J, Neumann K, Minden HH, Engelhardt J. Radiation exposure of patient and physician during implantation and upgrade of cardiac resynchronization devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:1003–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vano E, Rosenstein M, Liniecki J, Rehani MM, Martin CJ, Vetter RJ, ICRP Publication 113. Education and training in radiological protection for diagnostic and interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2009;39:7–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Efstathopoulos EP, Pantos I, Andreou M, Gkatzis A, Carinou E, Koukorava C, et al. Occupational radiation doses to the extremities and the eyes in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:70–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Thibault B, Andrade JG, Dubuc M, Talajic M, Guerra PG, Dyrda K, et al. Reducing radiation exposure during CRT implant procedures: early experience with a sensor-based navigation system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chida K, Inaba Y, Saito H, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S, Kohzuki M, et al. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1680–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chida K, Kaga Y, Haga Y, Kataoka N, Kumasaka E, Meguro T, et al. Occupational dose in interventional radiology procedures. AJR A J of Roentgenol. 2013;200:138–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chida K, Kato M, Kagaya Y, Zuguchi M, Saito H, Ishibashi T, et al. Radiation dose and radiation protection for patients and physicians during interventional procedure. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Funama Y, Nagasue N, Awai K, Sakamoto I, Kakei K, Shimamura M, et al. Radiation exposure of operator performing interventional procedures using a flat panel angiography system: evaluation with photoluminescence glass dosimeters. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FH, Vano E, Ernst S, Schilling R, Picano E, et al. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. Europace. 2014;16:946–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Valentin J. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2000;30:7–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ertel A, Nadelson J, Shroff AR, Sweis R, Ferrera D, Vidovich MI. Radiation dose reduction during radial cardiac catheterization: evaluation of a dedicated radial angiography absorption shielding drape. ISRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:769167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdelaal E, Plourde G, MacHaalany J, Arsenault J, Rimac G, Dery JP, et al. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:567–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brambilla M, Cerini P, Lizio D, Vigna L, Carriero A, Fossaceca R. Cumulative radiation dose and radiation risk from medical imaging in patients subjected to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiol Med. 2015;120:563–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malliet N, Andrade JG, Khairy P, Nguyen Thanh HK, Venier S, Dubuc M, et al. Impact of a Novel Catheter Tracking System on Radiation Exposure During the Procedural Phases of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:784–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chida K, Takahashi T, Ito D, Shimura H, Takeda K, Zuguchi M. Clarifying and visualizing sources of staff-received scattered radiation in interventional procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W900–W903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sciahbasi A, Rigattieri S, Sarandrea A, Cera M, Di Russo C, Fedele S, et al. Determinants of operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures. Am Heart J. 2017;187:10–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chida K, Morishima Y, Katahira Y, Chiba H, Zuguchi M. Evaluation of additional lead shielding in protecting the physician from radiation during cardiac interventional procedures. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi. 2005;61:1632–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Dijk JD, Ottervanger JP, Delnoy PP, Lagerweij MC, Knollema S, Slump CH, et al. Impact of new X-ray technology on patient dose in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;48:105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. ICRP publication 103. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morishima Y, Chida K, Katahira Y, Seto H, Chiba H, Tabayashi K. Need for radiation safety education for interventional cardiology staff, especially nurses. Acta Cardiol. 2016;71:151–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Inaba Y, Chida K, Kobayashi R, Kaga Y, Zuguchi M. Fundamental study of a real-time occupational dosimetry system for interventional radiology staff. J Radiol Prot. 2014;34:N65–N7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chida K, Morishima Y, Inaba Y, Taura M, Ebata A, Takeda K, et al. Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;149:410–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Koichi Tabayashi, MD, PhD Department of Cardiovascular Center, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital. We also thank Hiroo Chiba RT, Department of Radiology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, for technical assistance in this study. We thank Karl Embleton, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiaki Morishima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

Not applicable.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morishima, Y., Chida, K. & Katahira, Y. The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Jpn J Radiol 37, 95–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0783-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0783-7

Keywords

Navigation