Skip to main content
Log in

Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: initial clinical experience in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This clinical study was conducted to evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Japan.

Materials and methods

The study was designed in a prospective setting. Five patients (3 men and 2 women; mean age, 66.6 ± 5.8 years) with 6 HCCs were enrolled and treated using percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided IRE. Safety was assessed based on adverse events and laboratory values. Local control was assessed using contrast-enhanced US with a perflubutane microbubble contrast agent, contrast-enhanced multiphase CT, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) at designated points.

Results

The tumors ranged in diameter from 11 to 28 mm (mean diameter, 17.5 ± 6.3 mm). Five of the 6 tumors (83 %) were successfully treated, with no local recurrence to date (mean follow-up 244 ± 55 days). In 1 lesion located in liver segment 1, residual tumor was diagnosed at 7 days after intervention by follow-up EOB-MRI. No serious complications related to the IRE procedure were observed.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that image-guided percutaneous IRE can achieve satisfactory local disease control, particularly for small HCCs, and is well tolerated by patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:223–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee EW, Loh CT, Kee ST. Imaging guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation: ultrasound and immunohistological correlation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin RC, Philips P, Ellis S, Hayes D, Bagla S. Irreversible electroporation of unresectable soft tissue tumors with vascular invasion: effective palliation. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:540.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheung W, Kavnoudias H, Roberts S, Szkandera B, Kemp W, Thomson KR. Irreversible electroporation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: initial experience and review of safety and outcomes. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013;12:233–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin RC 2nd, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: potential improved overall survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:S443–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomson KR, Cheung W, Ellis SJ, Federman D, Kavnoudias H, Loader-Oliver D, et al. Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:611–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valerio M, Dickinson L, Ali A, Ramachandran N, Donaldson I, Freeman A, et al. A prospective development study investigating focal irreversible electroporation in men with localised prostate cancer: Nanoknife Electroporation Ablation Trial (NEAT). Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;39:57–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, Matsui O, Sakamoto M, Nakashima O, et al. HCC Expert Panel of Japan Society of Hepatology. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis. 2011;29:339–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. International Working Party. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology. 1995;22:983–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Millward SF, Sacks D. Society of Interventional Radiology. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:S189–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Kobayashi Y, Imai Y. Assessment of irreversible electroporation ablation zone using Kupffer-phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images with Sonazoid. J Med Ultrason. 2014;41:531–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Kobayashi Y, Kasuya K, Nagakawa Y, Tsuchida A, et al. Assessment of various types of US findings after irreversible electroporation in porcine liver: comparison with radiofrequency ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo Y, Zhang Y, Nijm GM, Sahakian AV, Yang GY, Omary RA, et al. Irreversible electroporation in the liver: contrast-enhanced inversion-recovery MR imaging approaches to differentiate reversibly electroporated penumbra from irreversibly electroporated ablation zones. Radiology. 2011;258:461–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qin Z, Jiang J, Long G, Lindgren B, Bischof JC. Irreversible electroporation: an in vivo study with dorsal skin fold chamber. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:619–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moriyasu F, Itoh K. Efficacy of perflubutane microbubble-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions: phase 3 multicenter clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:86–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Shiraishi J, Saito K, Taira J, Saguchi T, et al. Assessment of arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced US and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology. 2010;257:24–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rhim H, Lee MH, Kim YS, Choi D, Lee WJ, Lim HK. Planning sonography to assess the feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1324–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunishi Y, Numata K, Morimoto M, Okada M, Kaneko T, Maeda S, et al. Efficacy of fusion imaging combining sonography and hepatobiliary phase MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA to detect small hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:106–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kingham TP, Karkar AM, D’Angelica MI, Allen PJ, Dematteo RP, Getrajdman GI, et al. Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:379–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by MEXT KAKENHI Grant Number 26865030.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsutoshi Sugimoto.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugimoto, K., Moriyasu, F., Kobayashi, Y. et al. Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: initial clinical experience in Japan. Jpn J Radiol 33, 424–432 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0442-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0442-1

Keywords

Navigation