Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of axial diameters and CT obstruction scores for determining echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of cardiac computed tomography (CT) parameters and pulmonary artery (PA) obstruction (OS) scores in determining the echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and methods

A total of 120 patients with acute PE were included in the study. Right ventricle/left ventricle ratio (RV/LV); PA axial diameter; superior vena cava (SVC) axial diameter; and Ghanima, Miller, Qanadli, and Mastora obstruction scores were obtained using CT. RVD was assessed by echocardiography. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of RVD.

Results

RV/LV ratio, SVC axial diameter, PA axial diameter, and Miller, Qanadli, and Mastora scores were significantly increased in the RVD group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that RV/LV ratio [OR 6.36 (2.02–279.46 95 % CI), p = 0.01] and PA axial diameter [OR 5.02 (1.02–1.26 95 % CI), p = 0.03] were independent predictors of echocardiographic RVD. Predictive values of these parameters were improved when combined with other intragroup cutoff values. A cutoff value for the RV/LV ratio of >1.08 had 81.43 % sensitivity, 52.08 % specificity, 71.3 PPV, and 65.8 NPV for prediction of RVD.

Conclusion

Tomographic axial diameters enable more accurate predictions of RVD than OS scores do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galie N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2008;29(18):2276–315.

  2. Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P, Pieralli F, Camaiti A, Santoro G, et al. Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2000;101(24):2817–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer M, Fink C, Roeger S, Apfaltrer P, Haghi D, Kaminski WE, et al. Benefit of combining quantitative cardiac CT parameters with troponin I for predicting right ventricular dysfunction and adverse clinical events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Apfaltrer P, Henzler T, Meyer M, Roeger S, Haghi D, Gruettner J, et al. Correlation of CT angiographic pulmonary artery obstruction scores with right ventricular dysfunction and clinical outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10):2867–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Henzler T, Krissak R, Reichert M, Sueselbeck T, Schoenberg SO, Fink C. Volumetric analysis of pulmonary CTA for the assessment of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(3):309–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bankier AA, Janata K, Fleischmann D, Kreuzer S, Mallek R, Frossard M, et al. Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: evaluation of two modified angiographic scores and comparison with clinical data. J Thorac Imaging. 1997;12(2):150–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Meer RW, Pattynama PM, van Strijen MJ, van den Berg-Huijsmans AA, Hartmann IJ, Putter H, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary obstruction index at helical CT: prediction of clinical outcome during 3-month follow-up in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 2005;235(3):798–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collomb D, Paramelle PJ, Calaque O, Bosson JL, Vanzetto G, Barnoud D, et al. Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(7):1508–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Araoz PA, Gotway MB, Trowbridge RL, Bailey RA, Auerbach AD, Reddy GP, et al. Helical CT pulmonary angiography predictors of in-hospital morbidity and mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging. 2003;18(4):207–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Willems V, Lambermont B, Gerard P, D’Orio V, et al. Severe pulmonary embolism:pulmonary artery clot load scores and cardiovascular parameters as predictors of mortality. Radiology. 2006;239(3):884–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Venkatesh SK, Wang SC. Central clot score at computed tomography as a predictor of 30-day mortality after acute pulmonary embolism. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010;39(6):442–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(1):92–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(12):997–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(2):167–84.

  15. Miller GA, Sutton GC, Kerr IH, Gibson RV, Honey M. Comparison of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of isolated acute massive pulmonary embolism. Br Med J. 1971;2(5763):681–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A, Joseph T, Mesurolle B, Oliva VL, et al. New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(6):1415–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Masson P, Galland E, Delannoy V, Bauchart JJ, et al. Severity of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of a new spiral CT angiographic score in correlation with echocardiographic data. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(1):29–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghanima W, Abdelnoor M, Holmen LO, Nielssen BE, Sandset PM. The association between the proximal extension of the clot and the severity of pulmonary embolism (PE): a proposal for a new radiological score for PE. J Intern Med. 2007;261(1):74–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Bruyere PJ, D’Orio V, Dondelinger RF. Can CT pulmonary angiography allow assessment of severity and prognosis in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism? What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2006;26(1):23–39 (discussion 40).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JR, Chang SA, Jang SY, No HJ, Park SJ, Choi SH, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular dysfunction and prediction of clinical outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism by chest computed tomography: comparisons with echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(4):979–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Staskiewicz G, Czekajska-Chehab E, Uhlig S, Przegalinski J, Maciejewski R, Drop A. Logistic regression model for identification of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism by means of computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(8):1236–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cok G, Tasbakan MS, Ceylan N, Bayraktaroglu S, Duman S. Can we use CT pulmonary angiography as an alternative to echocardiography in determining right ventricular dysfunction and its severity in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism? Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31(3):172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In this study, Alpay Aribas, Suat Keskin, and Hakan Akilli contributed to the study design, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper, Mehmet Kayrak contributed to the study design, performed research, and analyzed data, Halil İbrahim Erdogan and Oguzhan Yildirim contributed to data collection and performed research, and Ibrahim Guler and Taha Tahir Bekci performed research and analyzed data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alpay Aribas.

Additional information

The present manuscript was accepted for oral presentation at the 29th Turkish Cardiology Congress with International Participation (held 26–29 October 2013) and was published in the online version of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) on 29 October 2013.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aribas, A., Keskin, S., Akilli, H. et al. The use of axial diameters and CT obstruction scores for determining echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Jpn J Radiol 32, 451–460 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0327-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0327-8

Keywords

Navigation