Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

18F-FDG-PET/CT findings of retroperitoneal tumors: a pictorial essay

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variety of different tumors can arise from any of the tissues present in the retroperitoneum, and they exhibit a wide range of pathologic types. Although computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can demonstrate important characteristics of these tumors, diagnosis is often challenging for radiologists. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to review 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) features of different kinds of benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors in comparison with CT or MRI findings alone and to become familiar with the wide variety of imaging characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. Lane RH, Stephens DH, Reiman HM. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT findings in 90 cases with clinical and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:83–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tateishi U, Terauchi T, Inoue T, Tobinai K. Nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways: PET/CT. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:232–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchings M, Barrington SF. PET/CT for therapy response assessment in lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conyers R, Young S, Thomas DM. Liposarcoma: molecular genetics and therapeutics. Sarcoma. 2010. doi:10.1155/2011/483154.

  5. Schwarzbach MH, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Mechtersheimer G, Hinz U, Willeke F, Cardona S, et al. Assessment of soft tissue lesions suspicious for liposarcoma by 18F-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Anticancer Res. 2001;21:3609–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner W, Eary JF, Hwang W, Vernon C, Conrad EU. Risk assessment in liposarcoma patients based on FDG PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. Spectrum of FDG PET/CT of uterine tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamane T, Takaoka A, Kita M, Imai Y, Senda M. 18F-FLT PET performs better than 18F-FDG PET in differentiating malignant uterine corpus tumors from benign leiomyoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:478–84.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsujikawa T, Yoshida Y, Mori T, et al. Uterine tumors: pathophysiologic imaging with 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-estradiol and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET—initial experience. Radiology. 2008;248:599–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito K, Masuda-Miyata Y, Wada S, Morooka M, Yamasawa K, Hashimoto M, et al. F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging of bulky myxofibrosarcoma in chest wall. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:212–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang SS, Park SY, Park YH. The CT and F-FDG PET/CT appearance of primary renal malignant fibrous histiocytoma. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010;54:365–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berrebi O, Steiner C. keller A, Rougemont AL, Ratib O. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in the diagnosis of malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia in the pelvic bones. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33:469–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Giorgi U, Pupi A, Fiorentini G, Rosti G, Marangolo M. FDG-PET in the management of germ cell tumor. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:90–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Otomi Y, Otsuka H, Morita N, Terazawa K, Furutani K, Harada M, et al. Relationship between FDG uptake and the pathological risk category in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Med Invest. 2010;57:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park JW, Cho CH, Jeong D, Chae HD. Role of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gastric GIST: predicting malignant potential pre-operatively. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Antoch G, Kanja J, Bauer S, Kuehl H, Renzing-Koehler K, Schuette J, et al. Comparison of PET, CT, and dual-modality PET/CT imaging for monitoring of imatinib (STI571) therapy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:357–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaulieu S, Rubin B, Djang D, Conrad E, Turcotte E, Eary JF. Positron emission tomography of schwannomas: emphasizing its potential in preoperative planning. AJR. 2004;182:971–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamada K, Tomita Y, Qiu Y, Tomoeda M, Ueda T, Tamai N, et al. 18F-FDG PET analysis of schwannoma: increase of SUVmax in the delayed scan is correlated with elevated VEGF/VPF expression in the tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shulkin BL, Thompson NW, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Sisson JC. Pheochromocytomas: imaging with 2-[Fulorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET. Radiology. 1999;212:35–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taieb D, Sebag F, Barlier A, Tessonnier L, Palazzo FF, Morange I, et al. 18F-FDG activity of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a new molecular imaging signature? J Nucl Med. 2009;50:711–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyake M, Tateishi U, Maeda T, Arai Y, Seki K, Hasegawa T, et al. A case of ganglioneuroma presenting abnormal FDG uptake. Ann Nucl Med. 2006;20:357–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuhiro Kitajima.

About this article

Cite this article

Kitajima, K., Kono, A., Konishi, J. et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT findings of retroperitoneal tumors: a pictorial essay. Jpn J Radiol 31, 301–309 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0192-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0192-x

Keywords

Navigation