Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to clarify the frequency of malignancy and the histopathological characteristics of the lesions in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB).

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients with 102 lesions who had undergone MRI-guided VAB was performed. The biopsies were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a commercially available biopsy system. None of the lesions seen with MRI could be detected by mammography or second-look ultrasonography.

Results

The average lesion sizes of the focus, mass, and nonmass lesions before the biopsy were 4.5, 8.2, and 21 mm, respectively. Twelve patients (12%) had lesions located in the deep portion of the breast, close to the pectoral muscle. The biopsy was successfully performed without important side effects in all patients. Histopathological findings were invasive ductal carcinoma in 6 (6%), in situ carcinoma in 28 (27%), and high-risk and benign in 68 (67%). Two high-risk lesions were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and three DCIS lesions were upgraded to invasive ductal carcinoma at surgical excision.

Conclusion

The high rate of DCIS might be a unique feature among Japanese women. However, MRI-guided VAB is necessary for MRI-only visible suspicious lesions in Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology 1994;193:97–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast (www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/breast.aspx).

  3. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1307–1318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Fukuma E. MR-guided vacuumassisted breast biopsy using a non-titanium needle. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007;6:259–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Suzuki T, Kawano N, Ozaki S, Sakamoto N, et al. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique? Breast Cancer 2009;16:121–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tozaki M. Clinical experience of MRI-guided biopsy using a hand-held portable system. Jpn J Magn Reson Med 2009;29:113–119 (Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th edn. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tozaki M, Fukuma E. 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for char acterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:840–849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization classification of tumors: pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC; 2003.

  10. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991;19:403–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U, Viehweg P, Buchmann J, Lampe D, et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1656–1665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, Casselman J, Baath L, Sittek H, et al. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1463–1470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prat X, Sittek H, Grosse A, Baath L, Perlet C, Alberich T, et al. European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localization device: technical improvements based on phase-I evaluation. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1720–1727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 2006;106:982–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Perretta T, Pistolese CA, Bolacchi F, Cossu E, Fiaschetti V, Simonetti G. MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation. Radiol Med 2008;113:830–840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Athanasiou A, Petrow P, Ollivier L, et al. Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1554–1562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Thornton CM, Van Zee KJ, Tan LK. Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1283–1293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:183–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 2006;238:54–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRIguided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1798–1804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahoney MC. Initial clinical experience with a new MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy device. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:900–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, Abe S, Ozaki S, Fukuma E. False-negative ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast: difference with US-detected and MRI-detected lesions. Breast Cancer 2010;17:110–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozaki S, Tozaki M, Fukuma E, Kawano N, Suzuki T, Yamashiro N, et al. Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer? Breast Cancer 2008;15:169–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuhiro Tozaki.

About this article

Cite this article

Tozaki, M., Yamashiro, N., Sakamoto, M. et al. Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women. Jpn J Radiol 28, 527–533 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0464-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0464-7

Key words

Navigation