Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the scanning technique for covering the whole breast using a commercially available automated breast ultrasonography (US) system.

Materials and methods

A total of 40 patients in the supine position underwent automated breast US (ABVS: Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA) and hand-held US. The scanning included sequential scans in the upper-outer, lower-outer, lower-inner, and upper-inner regions. After scanning all four segments of each breast using ABVS, hand-held US was performed in all the patients. The detectability of the lesions using the ABVS technique compared with that using the handheld US was evaluated. The average scanning time was compared between any two of the three examiners with various lengths of experience in breast US.

Results

In all, 61 lesions were detected by hand-held US. The average size of the lesions was 7.7 mm (range 2.5–26.0 mm). The number of detected lesions by ABVS was consistent with those found by hand-held US in each patient. The average total scanning time for each examiner using ABVS was 10.9, 11.1, and 11.5 min, respectively. No significant difference was found in the total scanning time between any two of the three examiners.

Conclusion

The four-scans technique for the major segments of the breast is thought to be an operator-independent, feasible method for performing automated breast US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123–134.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijver MJ, van Voorthuisen AE. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 1999;213:413–422.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flobbe K, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:1044–1050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maturo VG, Zusmer NR, Gilson AJ, Smoak WM, Janowitz WR, Bear BE, et al. Ultrasound of the whole breast utilizing a dedicated automated breast scanner. Radiology 1980;137:457–463.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zusmer NR, Goddard J, Maturo VG, Robinson MJ, Cuadra A, Bear BE. Automated sonomammographic-xeromammographic-pathologic correlations in the assessment of carcinoma of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 1982;1:19–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Egan RL, Egan KL. Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole-breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:493–497.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson VP, Kelly-Fry E, Rothschild PA, Holden RW, Clark SA. Automated breast sonography using a 7.5-mHz PVDF transducer: preliminary clinical evaluation-work in progress. Radiology 1986;159:679–684.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, Gold RH, Sarti D, King W 3rd. Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management. Radiology 1987;165:103–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vilaro MM, Kurtz AB, Needleman L, Fleischer AC, Mitchell DG, Rosenberg A, et al. Hand-held and automated sonomammography: clinical role relative to X-ray mammography. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:95–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification: a pilot study. Rofo 2008;180:804–808.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cosgrove DO, Kedar RP, Bamber JC, al-Murrani B, Davey JB, Fisher C, et al. Breast diseases: color Doppler US in differential diagnosis. Radiology 1993;189:99–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raza S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US. Radiology 1997;203:164–168.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuhiro Tozaki.

About this article

Cite this article

Tozaki, M., Isobe, S., Yamaguchi, M. et al. Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner. Jpn J Radiol 28, 325–328 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0424-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0424-2

Key words

Navigation