Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monte Carlo dose calculations for a 6-MV photon beam in a thorax phantom

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Radiation Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study we evaluated the accuracy of the Monte Carlo (MC) and effective path length (EPL) methods for dose calculations in the inhomogeneous thorax phantom.

Materials and methods

The Philips SL 75/5 linear accelerator head was modeled using the MCNP4C Monte Carlo code. An anatomic inhomogeneous thorax phantom was irradiated with a 6-MV photon beam, and the doses along points of the central axis of the beam were measured by a small ionization chamber. The central axis relative dose was calculated by the MCNP4C code and the EPL method in a conventional treatment planning system. The results of calculations and measurements were compared.

Results

For all measured points on the thorax phantom the results of the MC method were in agreement with the actual measurement (local difference was less than 2%). For the EPL method, the amount of error was dependent on the field size and the point location in the phantom. The maximum error was +19.5 and +26.8 for field sizes of 10 × 10 and 5 × 5 cm2 for lateral irradiation.

Conclusion

Our study showed large, unacceptable errors for EPL calculations in the lung for both field sizes. The accuracy of the MC method was better than the recommended value of 3%. Thus, application of this method is strongly recommended for lung dose calculations, especially for small field sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E El-Khatib JJ Battista (1986) ArticleTitleAccuracy of lung dose calculations for large fields irradiation with 6 MV X-rays Med Phys 13 111–5 Occurrence Handle3951402 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC2cnjvVA%3D Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.595953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E El-Khatib M Evans M Pla JR Cunningham (1989) ArticleTitleEvaluation of lung dose correction methods for photon irradiations of thorax phantoms Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17 871–8 Occurrence Handle2777679 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaA2sbpsVM%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. CG Orton S Chungbin EE Klein MT Gillin TE Schultheiss WT Sause (1998) ArticleTitleStudy of lung density corrections in a clinical trial (RTOG 88-08) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41 787–94 Occurrence Handle9652839 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhsV2ntQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00117-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. KL Wu GL Jiang Y Liao H Qian LJ Wang XL Fu S Zhao (2003) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I/II dose escalation clinical trial Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 1336–44 Occurrence Handle14630271 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01385-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. K Nakagawa Y Aoki M Tago A Terahara K Ohtomo (2000) ArticleTitleMegavoltage CT-assisted stereotactic radiosurgery for thoracic tumors: original research in the treatment of thoracic neoplasms Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 449–57 Occurrence Handle10974461 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvlvVCisQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00617-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. FCP Plessis CA Willemse MG Lotter (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of the Batho, ETAR and Monte Carlo dose calculation methods in CT based patient models Med Phys 28 582–9 Occurrence Handle11339755 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1357223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MR Arnifield CH Siantar L Cox R Mohan (2000) ArticleTitleThe impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose Med Phys 27 1266–74 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.599004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H Saitoh T Fujisaki R Sakal E Kunieda (2002) ArticleTitleDose distribution of narrow beam irradiation for small lung tumor Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 1380–7 Occurrence Handle12128140 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02893-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JJ Demarco Solberg TD. A CT-based (1998) ArticleTitleMonte Carlo tool for dosimetry planning and analysis Med Phys 25 1–11 Occurrence Handle9472820 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jt1WlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.598167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. JJ Demarco IJ Chetty TD Solberg (2002) ArticleTitleA Monte Carlo tutorial and the application for radiotherapy treatment planning Med Dosim 27 43–50 Occurrence Handle12019965 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383nvVCktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00087-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. TD Solberg JJ DeMarco IJ Chetty AV Mesa CH Cagnon AN Li et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA review of radiation dosimetry application using the MCNP Monte Carlo code Radiochim Acta 89 337–55 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksFChsb0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A Mesbahi MK Fix M Allahverdi E Grein Garaati H. Monte (2005) ArticleTitleCarlo calculation of Varian 2300C/D Linac photon beam characteristics: a comparison between MCNP4C, GEANT3, and measurements Appl Radiat Isot 62 469–4 Occurrence Handle15607926 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFWqsrnL Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.07.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D Sheikh-Bagheri DWO Rogers (2002) ArticleTitleSensitivity of megavoltage photon beam Monte Carlo simulations to electron beam and other parameters Med Phys 29 379–90 Occurrence Handle11930913 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1446109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A Tzedakis JE Damilakis M Mazonakis J Stratakis H Varveris N Gourtsoyannis (2004) ArticleTitleInfluence of initial electron beam parameters on Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for radiotherapy photon beams Med Phys 31 907–13 Occurrence Handle15125009 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1668551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements. Phantoms and computational models in therapy, diagnosis and protection. Report No. 48. Washington, DC: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement; 1992.

  16. Rice RK, Hansen JL, Chin LM, Mijnheer BJ, Bjarngard BE. The influence of ionization chamber and phantom design on the measurement of lung dose in photon beams. Med Phys 1988;15:884–95. 17. Venselaar J, Welleweerd H, Mijnheer B. Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. Radiother Oncol 2001;60:191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  17. PJ Keall JV Siebers R Jeraj R Mohan (2000) ArticleTitleThe effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans Med Phys 27 478–84 Occurrence Handle10757600 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hvVGhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.598916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. TR Mackie E El-Khatib J Battista J Scrimger J Van Dyk JR Cunningham (1985) ArticleTitleLung dose corrections for 6 and 15 M X-rays Med Phys 12 327–32 Occurrence Handle3925308 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB2c%2FhvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.595691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. IJ Chetty PM Charland N Tyagi D Mc Shan (2000) ArticleTitlePhoton beam relative dose validation of DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media Med Phys 30 563–73 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1555671

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Farajollahi.

About this article

Cite this article

Farajollahi, A., Mesbahi, A. Monte Carlo dose calculations for a 6-MV photon beam in a thorax phantom. Radiat Med 24, 269–276 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-005-1493-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-005-1493-5

Key words

Navigation