Abstract
Prestack seismic inversion has been widely used around the seismic exploration. It can precisely output the elastic properties of layers in subsurface, e.g., P-wave velocity (\(V_{p}\)), S-wave velocity (\(V_{s}\)), and density (\(\rho \)). These are utilized further to extract many reservoir properties, like saturation and porosity, which are very helpful for the successful oil field development. The accuracy of prestack inversion result could play a critical role for the evaluation of reservoir characterization and the quantitative interpretation. It has been observed the existing relationships among velocities and density (\(V_{p}\), \(V_{s}\), and \(\rho \)) lead to the correlations of three reflectivities (\(R_{p}\), \(R_{s}\), and \(R_{\rho }\)). In this paper, we establish a new formulation for amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion incorporating these correlations. A machine learning technique—block sparse Bayesian learning, has been implemented as the inversion engine to solve \(R_p\), \(R_s\), and \(R_\rho \) and to estimate the correlations described as the covariance matrix automatically. Due to the contribution of relationship between velocities and density, the performance of proposed AVA inversion is superior to the conventional technique in denoising and highlighting small-scale reflections. Three reflectivities are finally converted into velocities and density via an optimal multi-trace algorithm L-BFGS, which can mighty mitigate the lateral discontinuity of inverted results. The proposed approach has been tested on the synthetic examples. It shows a good consistence between inverted and true elastic properties. Field data test with the seismic profiles in Ordos basin area has demonstrated its high feasibility and efficiency for practical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology. Theory and Method pp 304–308
Bortfeld R (1961) Approximations to the reflection and transmission coefficients of plane longitudinal and transverse waves. Geophys Prospect 9(4):485–502
Buland A, Omre H (2003) Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics 68(1):185–198
Chen SS, Donoho DL, Saunders MA (2001) Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev 43(1):129–159
Chopra S, Castagna JP (2007) Introduction to this special section-AVO. Lead Edge 26(12):1506–1507
Du Q, Zhang B, Meng X et al (2016) Two-step joint pp-and ps-wave three-term amplitude-variation with offset inversion. Interpretation 4(4):T613–T625
Fatti JL, Smith GC, Vail PJ et al (1994) Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: a 3-D seismic case history using the Geostack technique. Geophysics 59(9):1362–1376
Foucart S, Lai MJ (2009) Sparsest solutions of underdetermined linear systems via \(l\)q-minimization for 0 < q ≤ 1. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 26(3):395–407
Gholami A, Siahkoohi H (2010) Regularization of linear and non-linear geophysical ill-posed problems with joint sparsity constraints. Geophys J Int 180(2):871–882
Gorodnitsky IF, Rao BD (1997) Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm. IEEE Trans Sig Process 45(3):600–616
Gouveia WP, Scales JA (1998) Bayesian seismic waveform inversion: parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 103(B2):2759–2779
Gray D, Goodway B, Chen T (1999) Bridging the gap: using AVO to detect changes in fundamental elastic constants. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 1999. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 852–855
Horn RA, Horn RA, Johnson CR (1994) Topics in matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press
Ji S, Xue Y, Carin L (2008) Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Sig Process 56(6):2346–2356
Levy S, Fullagar PK (1981) Reconstruction of a sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and application to high-resolution deconvolution. Geophysics 46(9):1235–1243
Li C, Zhang J, Zhu Z (2017) Bayesian AVO inversion with consistent angle parameters. J Appl Geophys 139:246–256
Lin J, Dyer C (2010) Data-intensive text processing with MapReduce. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies 3(1):1–177
Longbottom J, Walden A, White R (1988) Principles and application of maximum kurtosis phase estimation. Geophys Prospect 36(2):115–138
Lörtzer G, Berkhout A (1992) An integrated approach to lithologic inversion-part I: theory. Geophysics 57(2):233–244
Lyu Q, Lin Z, She Y et al (2013) A comparison of typical \(l_p\) minimization algorithms. Neurocomputing 119:413–424
Ma M, Wang S, Yuan S et al (2017) Multichannel spatially correlated reflectivity inversion using block sparse Bayesian learning. Geophysics 82(4):V191–V199
Mazumder R, Friedman JH, Hastie T (2011) Sparsenet: coordinate descent with nonconvex penalties. J Am Stat Assoc 106(495):1125–1138
Moré JJ, Thuente DJ (1994) Line search algorithms with guaranteed sufficient decrease. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 20(3):286–307
Pérez DO, Velis DR, Sacchi MD (2013) High-resolution prestack seismic inversion using a hybrid FISTA least-squares strategy. Geophysics 78(5):R185–R195
Richards PG (1976) On the adequacy of plane-wave reflection/transmission coefficients in the analysis of seismic body waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66(3):701–717
Rogers S, Girolami M (2016) A first course in machine learning. CRC Press
Sacchi MD (1997) Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution. Geophys J Int 129(3):651–656
Sen MK, Roy IG (2003) Computation of differential seismograms and iteration adaptive regularization in prestack waveform inversion. Geophysics 68(6):2026–2039
She B, Wang Y, Liang J et al (2018) A data-driven amplitude variation with offset inversion method via learned dictionaries and sparse representation. Geophysics 83(6):R725–R748
Shuey R (1985) A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics 50(4):609–614
Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM
Tihonov AN (1963) Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Math 4:1035–1038
Tipping ME (2001) Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res 1:211–244
Ulrych TJ, Sacchi MD (2005) Information-based inversion and processing with applications. Elsevier
Varela OJ, Torres-Verdín C, Sen MK (2006) Enforcing smoothness and assessing uncertainty in non-linear one-dimensional prestack seismic inversion. Geophys Prospect 54(3):239–259
Wipf DP, Rao BD (2004) Sparse Bayesian learning for basis selection. IEEE Trans Sig Process 52(8):2153–2164
Wipf DP, Rao BD (2007) An empirical Bayesian strategy for solving the simultaneous sparse approximation problem. IEEE Trans Sig Process 55(7):3704–3716
Yin X, Zhang S (2014) Bayesian inversion for effective pore-fluid bulk modulus based on fluid-matrix decoupled amplitude variation with offset approximation. Geophysics 79(5):R221–R232
Zhang Z, Rao BD (2011) Sparse signal recovery with temporally correlated source vectors using sparse Bayesian learning. IEEE J Sel Top Sig Process 5(5):912–926
Zhang Z, Rao BD (2013) Extension of SBL algorithms for the recovery of block sparse signals with intra-block correlation. IEEE Trans Sig Process 61(8):2009–2015
Zhang R, Sen MK, Srinivasan S (2013) A prestack basis pursuit seismic inversion. Geophysics 78(1):R1–R11
Zhang B, Chang D, Lin T et al (2015) Improving the quality of prestack inversion by prestack data conditioning. Interpretation 3(1):T5–T12
Zoeppritz K (1919) On the reflection and propagation of seismic waves. Gott Nachr 1(5):66–84
Zong Z, Yin X, Wu G (2013) Multi-parameter nonlinear inversion with exact reflection coefficient equation. J Appl Geophys 98:21–32
Acknowledgements
We appreciate Z.S. Liu for the field seismic data, which was kindly provided by Sinopec. This work is supported by Sinopec under contract “Development of three innovative geophysical techniques” (17-0813) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102261307).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
Additional information
Edited by Prof. Sanyi Yuan (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Michał Malinowski (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, M., Zhang, R. Block sparse Bayesian learning-based prestack seismic inversion with the correlation of velocities and density. Acta Geophys. 71, 261–274 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00914-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00914-4