Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suspended sediment discharge modeling during flood events using two different artificial neural network algorithms

  • Research Article - Hydrology
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents modeling of artificial neural network (ANN) to forecast the suspended sediment discharges (SSD) during flood events in two different catchments in the Seybouse basin, northeastern Algeria. This study was carried out on hourly SSD and water discharge data during flood events from a period of 31 years in the Ressoul catchment and of 28 years in the Mellah catchment. The ANNs were trained according to two different algorithms: the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (LM) and the Quasi-Newton algorithm (BFGS). Seven input combinations were trained for the SSD prediction. The performance results indicated that both algorithms provided satisfactory simulations according to the determination coefficient (R2) and root mean squared error (RMSE) performance criteria, with priority to the BFGS algorithm; the coefficient of determination using the LM algorithm varies between 51.0 and 90.2%, whereas using the BFGS algorithm it varies between 54.3 and 93.5% in both studied catchments, with calculated improvement for all seven developed networks with the best improvement in the Ressoul catchment presented in ANN06 with \(\Delta_{{R^{2} }}\) 4.23% and \(\Delta_{{{\text{RMSE}}}}\) 1.74‰, and with the best improvement presented in ANN05 with \(\Delta_{{R^{2} }}\) 6.07% and \(\Delta_{{{\text{RMSE}}}}\) 0.71‰ in the Mellah catchment. The analysis showed that the use of Quasi-Newton method performed better than the Levenberg–Marquardt in both studied areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afan HA, El-Shafie A, Yaseen ZM, Hameed MM, Mohtar WHMW, Hussain A (2015) ANN based sediment prediction model utilizing different input scenarios. Water Resour Manag 29:1231–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed F, Hassan M, Hashmi HN (2018) Developing nonlinear models for sediment load estimation in an irrigation canal. Acta Geophys 66:1485–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh MJ, Nodoushan EJ, Kalarestaghi N, Chau KW (2017) Toward multi-day-ahead forecasting of suspended sediment concentration using ensemble models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:28017–28025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alp M, Cigizoglu HK (2007) Suspended sediment load simulation by two artificial neural network methods using hydrometeorological data. Environ Model softw 22:2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae DH, Jeong DM, Kim G (2007) Monthly dam inflow forecasts using weather forecasting information and neuro-fuzzy technique. Hydrol Sci J 52:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouguerra H, Bouanani A, Khanchoul K, Derdous O, Tachi SE (2017) Mapping erosion prone areas in the Bouhamdane watershed (Algeria) using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation through GIS. J Water Land Dev 32:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouhadeb CHE, Menani MR, Bouguerra H, Derdous O (2018) Assessing soil loss using GIS based RUSLE methodology, case of the Bou Namoussa watershed – North-East of Algeria. J Water Land Dev 36:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzeria H, Ghenim AN, Khanchoul K (2017) Using artificial neural network (ANN) for prediction of sediment loads, application to the Mellah catchment, northeast Algeria. J Water Land Dev 33:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broyden CG (1970) The convergence of single-rank quasi-newton methods. Math Comput 24:365–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clair TA, Ehrman JM (1998) Using neural networks to assess the influence of changing seasonal climates in modifying discharge, dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen export in eastern Canadian rivers. Water Resour Res 34:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis J, More J (1977) Quasi-Newton methods, motivation and theory. SIAM Rev Soc Ind Appl Math 19:46–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R (1970) A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput J 13:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb D (1970) A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means. Math Comput 24:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob R, Štokelj T, Grgič D (1998) Neural-network-based water inflow forecasting. Control Eng Pract 6:593–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training multilayer networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halff AH, Halff HM, Azmoodeh M (1993) Predicting runoff from rainfall using neural networks. In: Engineering hydrology. ASCE, pp 760–765

  • Hassan M, Shamim MA, Sikandar A, Mehmood I, Ahmed I, Ashiq SZ, Khitab A (2015) Development of sediment load estimation models by using artificial neural networking techniques. Environ Monit Assess 187(11):686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan M, Zaffar H, Mehmood I, Khitab A (2018) Development of streamflow prediction models for a weir using ANN and step-wise regression. Model Earth Syst Environ 4:1021–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Das A, Srivastava DK (1999) Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi Ö (2004) Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg–Marquardt training algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation. Hydrol Sci J 49:1025–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM, Ahmad S, McClain ME, Wang X, Lim YH (2011) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: An artificial neural network approach. Agric Water Manag 98:855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa MR, Rezaur RB, Saiedi S, Isa MH (2012) River suspended sediment prediction using various multilayer perceptron neural network training algorithms—a case study in Malaysia. Water Resour Manage 26:1879–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy HM, Watanabe KAND, Hirano M (2002) Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using artificial neural network model. J Hydraul Eng 128:588–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partal T (2009) River flow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms and wavelet transform. Can J Civ Eng 36:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piasecki A, Jurasz J, Adamowski JF (2018) Forecasting surface water-level fluctuations of a small glacial lake in Poland using a wavelet-based artificial intelligence method. Acta Geophys 66:1093–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riad S, Mania J, Bouchaou L, Najjar Y (2004) Rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network approach. Math Comput Model 40:839–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowinski PM, Czernuszenko W (1998) Experimental study of river turbulence under unsteady conditions. Acta Geophysica Polonica 46:461–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo GB, Ray C, De-Carlo EH (2006) Use of neural network to predict flash flood and attendant water qualities of a mountainous stream on Oahu. Hawaii J Hydrol 327:525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamim MA, Hassan M, Ahmad S, Zeeshan M (2016) A Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN) and local linear regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels. KSCE J Civ Eng 20:971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanno DF (1970) Conditioning of Quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Math Comput 24:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP, Jain A (2004) Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrol Process 18:833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tachi SE, Ouerdachi L, Remaoun M, Derdous O, Boutaghane H (2016) Forecasting suspended sediment load using regularized neural network: case study of the Isser River (Algeria). J Water Land Dev 29:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WC, Chau KW, Cheng CT, Qiu L (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydrol 374:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilamowski BM, Yu H (2010) Improved computation for Levenberg–Marquardt training. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21:930–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zealand CM, Burn DH, Simonovic SP (1999) Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 214:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YM, Lu XX, Zhou Y (2007) Suspended sediment flux modeling with artificial neural network: an example of the Longchuanjiang River in the Upper Yangtze Catchment, China. Geomorphology 84:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou R, Lung WS, Wu J (2007) An adaptive neural network embedded genetic algorithm approach for inverse water quality modeling. Water Resour Res 43:W08427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza Bouguerra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouguerra, H., Tachi, SE., Derdous, O. et al. Suspended sediment discharge modeling during flood events using two different artificial neural network algorithms. Acta Geophys. 67, 1649–1660 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00373-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00373-4

Keywords

Navigation